Page 9 of 30
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 9:51 am
by Snarky
StrangerCoug:What do you think of the SiX wagon?
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:14 am
by Porkens
Let the mafia puzzle out what the implications of what has been revealed does or does not mean for themselves. Let's just drop if for the time being. Damage may have been done, but I'm sure we could do more if we keep picking at it.
let's flip over six's rock and see what crawls out
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:36 am
by beastcharizard
Welcome to the scum pile Red. Being new isn't an excuse for being scummy. Also, quote the post that made the answer to my question SO obvious.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 11:32 am
by kunkstar7
SiX (3)
-
Porkens, snscompt1, Paschendale
snscompt1 (3)
-
tman2nd, beastcharizard, Aegor
beastcharizard (2)
-
idk, RedCoyote
StrangerCoug (1)
-
Snarky
Nobody Special (1)
-
StrangerCoug
Not Voting (3)
-
cxinlee, Nobody Special, SiX
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline for Day One is in (expired on 2014-05-16 14:09:09).
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 11:48 am
by StrangerCoug
It's hard to say. I don't really understand it at all.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 12:25 pm
by Snarky
Ok, this feels good then.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: SiX
Nobody on my scumlist has visited the wagon, so it must be a good one. And stangerCoug, my prime suspect, avoids it like pest. Since I don't think any StrangerCoug wagon will rise today, my vote will be better placed here.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 1:55 pm
by Paschendale
In post 205, Snarky wrote:Ok, this feels good then.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: SiX
Nobody on my scumlist has visited the wagon, so it must be a good one. And stangerCoug, my prime suspect, avoids it like pest. Since I don't think any StrangerCoug wagon will rise today, my vote will be better placed here.
What's your reason for suspecting the Coug?
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 2:22 pm
by Nobody Special
Okay, for lack of a better place to start, I just read SiX's iso. Supporting beast, as well as general all-around defensiveness, makes it a good place for my vote.
Vote: SiX
(L-2)
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 3:08 pm
by Snarky
Paschendale: Every post SC makes is scum trying to feel active. There's no substance, no will of scumhunting.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 5:29 pm
by Paschendale
I wouldn't say none. Not much, but not none. His discussion is mainly over the setup spec, but it's over the discussion of the setup spec. I don't think his accusations really hold water, but I don't know if they're faked.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 6:32 pm
by Aegor
This SiX wagon feels a bit too easy to me. It is making me uncomfortable.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:21 pm
by idk
Shit shit shit, i meant to post earlier but my phone died. Reeeeeaaaaally sorry bout that, but i promise a post will come tomorrow. Feel free to vote me if i don't.
Super sorry bout that. :/
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 11:20 pm
by Snarky
In post 210, Aegor wrote:This SiX wagon feels a bit too easy to me. It is making me uncomfortable.
Then start a StrangerCoug wagon?
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 12:44 am
by Nobody Special
I could go for that.
unvote
Vote: StrangerCoug
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 1:38 am
by Snarky
Let's get this rollin'
UNVOTE:
VOTE: StrangerCoug
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 2:46 am
by StrangerCoug
It's just... hard to get reads in this Kafkaesque game. I'm liking Aegor and Paschendale, beastcharizard is acceptable, snscompt1 is clearly sabotaging us, and Nobody Special is scum. That's it. I can't read the majority of you, and I'm beating myself up for that.
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 4:15 am
by snscompt1
Sabotage. Woo.
UNVOTE
VOTE COUG
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 5:11 am
by StrangerCoug
Nice OMGUS. Care to defend your accusation?
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 5:38 am
by snscompt1
Not OMGUS. Did you even vote me? Maybe I missed it. Refer to my previous posts about me thinking you as scum. Six was a RVS guess yet it went somewhere. I would prefer a wagon on you. For now at least.
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 6:39 am
by StrangerCoug
Do you deny that you're trying to help scum out with the PRs?
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 6:45 am
by RedCoyote
In post 202, beastcharizard wrote:Welcome to the scum pile Red. Being new isn't an excuse for being scummy. Also, quote the post that made the answer to my question SO obvious.
It has less to do with him being new and more to do with the fact that I don't think he's capable of putting on an act like this. I think this is genuine.
Also, I don't care if it's obvious or not, you're deliberately trying to provoke him into spilling more information. You know better.
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 7:30 am
by SiX
The way you build your statements seems very circumstantial to me, I like that.
On-topic about your questions.
I'm town reading Beastcharizard based on his content. He continuesly tries to bring forth new information that does make sence, at least it does to me.
I'm scumreading Cxinlee based on guts and for opposing the idea due to her being number 7 (center). Either number 2 and 4, or number 7 should be somehow connected to mafias to give a variety of targets.
As for Strangercoug, While I pushed cxinlee a little bit here on the opposing of theories, all theories are welcome, good or bad. Are you perhaps afraid that Beast his theories would be true?
If you happen to be town, then based on his theory there's a huge chance the opposite number of yours is a mafia. Have you taken that into account before you disapproved with his idea? If you're town, then you obviously shouldn't have anything to worry about.
I'm scumreading Porkens based on guts and the reason he decided to use against me in his vote.
The rest of the players are mainly null.
In post 191, StrangerCoug wrote:snscompt1, do you realize the damage you are doing to this game? No, this isn't even remotely close to a normal game. That does not give you the right to hand over setup information to the scum, which is
EXACTLY
what you are doing.
IGMEOY: snscompt1
. You can expect a vote from me if you continue on this route.
All I can see is people pushing snscompt1, inclusive you based on him leaking information. However, what has he actually leaked out that is this crucial for you to threaten him with a vote?
I'm sorry, but I find nothing through the posts, have I missed something? If so, please enlighten me.
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 7:54 am
by Aegor
In post 188, snscompt1 wrote:Yes I know. I stand by what I said. I know of 5 people who are either scum or have a PR. The end. No idea who is who nor will I spill their names. Aegor and Charizard, you guys both misunderstand. I said I know of 5 roles. THERE COULD BE MORE. But I know of five.
Really? So you were provided with the number of scum?
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 8:29 am
by snscompt1
Yes. Would you rather I say no? What kind of question is that?
Aegor wrote: In post 188, snscompt1 wrote:Yes I know. I stand by what I said. I know of 5 people who are either scum or have a PR. The end. No idea who is who nor will I spill their names. Aegor and Charizard, you guys both misunderstand. I said I know of 5 roles. THERE COULD BE MORE. But I know of five.
Really? So you were provided with the number of scum?
How on earth did you divine that from my statement?
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 8:46 am
by StrangerCoug
In post 221, SiX wrote:As for Strangercoug, While I pushed cxinlee a little bit here on the opposing of theories, all theories are welcome, good or bad. Are you perhaps afraid that Beast his theories would be true?
I'm damn near certain it's false, given he couldn't keep the numbers straight.
In post 221, SiX wrote:If you happen to be town, then based on his theory there's a huge chance the opposite number of yours is a mafia. Have you taken that into account before you disapproved with his idea? If you're town, then you obviously shouldn't have anything to worry about.
No, and I don't really care for the outguessing the mod.
In post 221, SiX wrote:All I can see is people pushing snscompt1, inclusive you based on him leaking information. However, what has he actually leaked out that is this crucial for you to threaten him with a vote?
I'm sorry, but I find nothing through the posts, have I missed something? If so, please enlighten me.
His saying a minimum of five combined power roles and scum doesn't bother you as antitown?
The question was what I meant by you "sabotaging" us, and I was asking if my accusation toward you was accurate. If you answered "no," I would have expected the answer to be accompanied by why what you were doing cannot correctly be described as sabotage.