Page 9 of 11

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:21 am
by bird1111
Vote Count

Bob700: 3 (HackerHuck, undo, undo)
Undo: 3 (johhan, Bob700, Bob700)
johhan: 2 (JordanA24, JordanA24)
yeahthatguy224: 1 (HackerHuck)

Not voting: yeahthatguy224, Pinky II

Has only used one vote: johhan

With 7 alive it is 6 to lynch!

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:28 am
by undo
Wow... Some votes have disappeared...

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:35 am
by bird1111
Must have missed them, fixed

Will be gone from tommorow until Tuesday.

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 3:34 pm
by Bob700
undo wrote: I agree. I have already exposed my opinion about Bob's scummy action in Day 1 - He voted Jordan and then immediately unvoted him with a nonsensical justification. Plus, look at the way takes advantage of the hammering situation and double votes me immediately, saying only: "for that very odd hammering of Albert". This is very vague and is no valid reason to cast a DOUBLE vote on someone. He acted discreetly, after an apparently innocent and helpful analysis post.

Based on this reasoning, I shall
Double Vote: Bob700
Few things. I see nothing scummy about voting to get some wanted knowledge. Based on the answer I received, I mentally concluded to myself that Jordan may not be scum, and keeping votes on him would be unsafe.

As for voting for you, I did it because of your careless hammering. An innocent would not go and "Accidentally" hammer someone. Only a scum would want to quickly end the day and kill someone, and then say it was a "accident". So, there you go. One vote for carelessness, and another for being possible scum.

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:40 pm
by JordanA24
Bob700 wrote:
undo wrote: I agree. I have already exposed my opinion about Bob's scummy action in Day 1 - He voted Jordan and then immediately unvoted him with a nonsensical justification. Plus, look at the way takes advantage of the hammering situation and double votes me immediately, saying only: "for that very odd hammering of Albert". This is very vague and is no valid reason to cast a DOUBLE vote on someone. He acted discreetly, after an apparently innocent and helpful analysis post.

Based on this reasoning, I shall
Double Vote: Bob700
Few things. I see nothing scummy about voting to get some wanted knowledge. Based on the answer I received, I mentally concluded to myself that Jordan may not be scum, and keeping votes on him would be unsafe.

As for voting for you, I did it because of your careless hammering. An innocent would not go and "Accidentally" hammer someone. Only a scum would want to quickly end the day and kill someone, and then say it was a "accident". So, there you go. One vote for carelessness, and another for being possible scum.
And who said he "accidently" hammered Albert? Who says he didn't just make a genuine mistake?

Unvote (1): Johhan Vote: Bob

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:32 am
by Bob700
JordanA24 wrote:
And who said he "accidently" hammered Albert? Who says he didn't just make a genuine mistake?

Unvote (1): Johhan Vote: Bob
I never said he made a mistake. I said, he purposely hammered Albert, and covered it up by saying it was a "Mistake".

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:31 am
by spectrumvoid
Will be gone this weekend too :)

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:35 am
by JordanA24
Bob700 wrote:
JordanA24 wrote:
And who said he "accidently" hammered Albert? Who says he didn't just make a genuine mistake?

Unvote (1): Johhan Vote: Bob
I never said he made a mistake. I said, he purposely hammered Albert, and covered it up by saying it was a "Mistake".
What I meant was why are you so convinced he deliberatly hammered Albert?

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:08 am
by Bob700
Why? Because I think he is scum. Scum would want a pro-town dead as soon as possible to get to their night action, along with staying alive another night. That is exactly what I think Undo did.

He killed Albert as soon as he could, and blamed it on a "Mistake". That way, he would seem to look innocent through our eyes in order to keep himself alive. All I am saying is that Undo's actions were very scummy. For that reason I think he is scum ergo, deliberately hammering Albert.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:12 am
by JordanA24
It was suspicious yes, but it doesn't neccessarily mean he's scum, he could have just made a vote miscount or not checked the vote count before joking. Careless yes, scummy no.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:47 am
by undo
Bob wrote:Scum would want a pro-town dead as soon as possible to get to their night action, along with staying alive another night. That is exactly what I think Undo did.

He killed Albert as soon as he could, and blamed it on a "Mistake".
Before Albert, there had been a lot of people at lynch -2, I could have hammered those people. Why would I wait for Albert? That's ridiculous.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 4:07 pm
by Bob700
undo wrote:
Bob wrote:Scum would want a pro-town dead as soon as possible to get to their night action, along with staying alive another night. That is exactly what I think Undo did.

He killed Albert as soon as he could, and blamed it on a "Mistake".
Before Albert, there had been a lot of people at lynch -2, I could have hammered those people. Why would I wait for Albert? That's ridiculous.
I don't know why you waited for Albert, you do. I can't give out your scum-reasons-to-hammer-Albert because I am not a psychic. So scum, why did you do it?

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:53 pm
by JordanA24
Bob700 wrote:
undo wrote:
Bob wrote:Scum would want a pro-town dead as soon as possible to get to their night action, along with staying alive another night. That is exactly what I think Undo did.

He killed Albert as soon as he could, and blamed it on a "Mistake".
Before Albert, there had been a lot of people at lynch -2, I could have hammered those people. Why would I wait for Albert? That's ridiculous.
I don't know why you waited for Albert, you do. I can't give out your scum-reasons-to-hammer-Albert because I am not a psychic. So scum, why did you do it?
Unvote: Johhan Vote: Bob700


That's both my votes on you now.

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:06 am
by HackerHuck
It seems that Bob got caught doing something fishy and he's now trying to press Albert hard to dodge the bullet.

Unvote: ThatNewGuy
Vote: Bob700

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:15 am
by JordanA24
Erm HH, you just lynched him by my count.

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:49 am
by HackerHuck
Darn double votes, it looks like you're right. Now I can see why undo and johhan were confused before.

However, that only furthers my point that Bob's case on Undo doesn't hold water.

EBWOP:
HackerHuck wrote:It seems that Bob got caught doing something fishy and he's now trying to press
Albert
Undo
hard to dodge the bullet.

Unvote: ThatNewGuy
Vote: Bob700

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:55 am
by JordanA24
Let's just hope we get lucky this time, or we're in trouble tomorrow.

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:11 pm
by Bob700
Oh noes for me. Well, I tried my best. :P

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:31 pm
by Pinky
Well, that wasn't a very productive day. OH well, we'll have to see the result first but the argument betweem Jordan and Bob was quite interesting and may need to be looked at more closely tomorrow.

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:04 am
by spectrumvoid
Vote Count

Bob700: 6 (HackerHuck, undo, undo, JordanA24, JordanA24, HackerHuck)
Undo: 3 (johhan, Bob700, Bob700)

(Locking this till bird gets back.)

Edit: prodding bird.

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:01 pm
by bird1111
You all decide after a short amount of conversation to string up Bob700; and then search his house, to find that it looks very similar to Phoebus', and contains several guns and several places for a group to meet, making it obvious that he was a mafia goon.

Bob700, Double Mafia Goon, lynched day 2


It is now Night 2, choices due Friday June 15th at 9:01 PM EDT; send them to spectrumvoid, not me, as I will be away during this time period

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 4:28 am
by spectrumvoid
The town wakes up. They start counting heads, and are 3 short. Looking around, they start checking who's not around.

HackerHuck, the double Serial Killer, is dead. The town heaves a sigh of relief.
But that was the only piece of good news.

The town eventually discover the bodies of JordanA24 and johhan, both innocent double TOWNIEs.

It is now day 3. With 3 alive, 3 will lynch.

Happy birthday bird~

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 6:18 am
by JordanA24
Bah! You can do it now town.

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 6:25 am
by Pinky
hm, i think those night choices mean the scum can kill twice, other than that I think it would be useful to look back at previous bandwagons. It is also useful to note that Bob who we now know was scum had both votes on undo, which could have been distancing once he realised he was going to be lynched or just trying to throw the town.

Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 8:08 am
by johhan
Bah! Go town! You can do it!