So since you all know I was gone, and you know that night didn't last an overly long amount of time, where's the "night was overly long so he must be the impatient serial killer" logic? I feel robbed.
Dirge blocked me. Bully for him. Doesn't really matter, as I have no night choice to send in, and wasn't here to send anything anyways. Of course, discussion went pretty quickly from "we have three killing parties!" to "we have a lucky doc and role-blocker!" and never made it to "we might have a serial killer who only kills on odd nights!"
There are two parts to Dirge's theory:
1) I'm the serial killer. Therefore, I managed to find a way to get internet access and send in my kill so Dirge would block it, and yet nobody got to the "we had a long night, obviously he's scum!" And yet, I'll bring it up since I'm a big fan (this game) of bringing up good points that other people will use as "evidence" against me.
2) I'm mafia. Knowing that Dirge is a roleblocker and that he and I went back and forth continuously on day one, would it make sense to send ME to do a kill on night two? Obviously Dirge is going to block me.
You all are applying bad mafia play to me, which is fine WERE I SCUM (and a bad player). Since I'm neither (the second in my opinion only probably
), none of this makes sense. I am pleased with getting four votes and two FOS'es (and one of them was REALLY ANGRY!
), but it's completely blind. Dirge is obviously not scum. It makes sense that he would block me, which isn't something that a Mafia being stuck with a roleblocking claim would necessarily do. But that doesn't mean his theory is anywhere near correct.
"1AM .. not a good time to think I started mixing massive and mathcam" - Totem, DP8
"unvote mlaker; vote massive; It's like MeMe/mneme and Corsato/Cadmium" - Dragon Phoenix, Newbie 38
PLEASE NOTE: I actively avoid being online on weekends! Don't replace me just because of this!