Page 9 of 11
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:15 pm
by Qman
Zu faul, the basic problem here is that I have a post restriction, so I'm having to abide by it. RE: Page 1 rule 1. It's part of why i'm not a posting machine.
I also did post the rule I broke, though I can't ID the restriction I do have.
As for the two N's (NN and Macmen) I'd still put NabNab at the top of my list. Having said that, money were mouth is, et al.
vote NabakovNabakov
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:17 pm
by Nocmen
We shouldn't be guessing the rules. I really think we should go and just play this normally, and just skirt the rules depending on the outcomes of what happen. Saying that, I need to still reread to get a good picture of the game right now.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:22 pm
by Thestatusquo
* players posed, meaning your deadline has been extended by that many days.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:27 pm
by Thestatusquo
8.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:17 pm
by Gorrad
I'm fairly sure I last voted Draux, and I'm more than happy to leave it for Zu Faul. A few points against him that have not already been addressed:
zu_Faul wrote:Gorrad wrote:Ok, I've reread, and here's my top 3 scumlist:
1. Nocem: Over-cautious, bad posting
2. Draux: Bad posting
3. Porochaz: Lurking
Vote: Nocem
If y'all want more elaboration, just ask. It's only four pages, though, and I really haven't seen any GOOD posts from Nocem or Draux.
I think that was a bit early for "Oh look, I suspect this one and this on and this one, I'll jump on any bandwagon which forms on any of these three." (which is what he did with his nextp ost he change his wagon).
It's never too early for a scumlist. Nocem and Draux posted nothing useful. Nothing. As for the vote hopping, I would NOT have switched for Poro, at least his few posts weren't as terrible as all of Drax and Nocem's. I found the two of them about as scummy as each other, as their scumtells were similar.
zu_Faul wrote:Qman is also guilty of wild bandwagon jumping (7 posts, four votes, four unvotes). Wants to seem like participating but also not pushing for anyone in particular.
I'd like to point out here how you made it seem like Qman's jumping was worse than it was. By saying 'four votes, four unvotes', instead of just 'four votes', you made it seem like he had jumped twice as much as he had. Of COURSE he unvoted. That's what you do before you vote!
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:20 pm
by Gorrad
Qman, while I know you can't ID your restriction, I'd like your next post to not contain a vote or unvote, if you are able to do so.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:42 pm
by Qman
Gorrad wrote:Qman, while I know you can't ID your restriction, I'd like your next post to not contain a vote or unvote, if you are able to do so.
Mmmm. You can probably extrapolate what I suspect Kalb was modkilled for if you look at the timing of the first few pages. I really
can't
say anymore.
unvote
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:57 pm
by Qman
On further thought, I think I'll
vote zu faul
for two major points.
1.) Draux wasn't the most pro town looking guy to replace into. (I'm not going to expand on this as many others already have.)
2.) Targeted at me:
Zu Faul wrote:
Yes, over half the game was rule talk. That's bad and doesn't leave much room for analysis.
I think you're scum holding back information we could use. You posted it because you either didn't think about it much or because you want your scumbuddy(buddies) to remind you at night to tell them the rule.
You are misrepresenting and/or assuming alot here. I can't say why Kab was modkilled because I don't know, though I suspect I do know why. I'm
assuming
he didn't follow his post restriction, as if I break mine I'll get modkilled so I
assume
the same held true for him. I'm not allowed to tell ANYONE what my post restriction is, if you guys figure it out wonderful, but I can't tell you. None of my
assumptions
are based on anything other than my situation and being able to extrapolate from there, your assumption seems to be based on trying to find a target not named "Zu Faul"
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:58 am
by zu_Faul
Qman wrote:your assumption seems to be based on trying to find a target not named "Zu Faul"
That's the worst accusation I've ever heard. Doind anything else would be -EV.
Your bandwagon jumping seems explained though. Therefore
unvote
Gorrad wrote:It's never too early for a scumlist.
Wrong. You just set up bandwagon jumping.
I'm not going to talk about the Yos2 thing anymore, because it's alost cause for me.
Really I expected longer replies then those only concerned with what I said about Yos2. (I'm looking at Pete D and Yos2, also Nocmen). If you don't post more you'll make it easy for scum to just have me lynched while they can meld in with their lurking.
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:59 am
by zu_Faul
I think "blend in" is what I wanted to say.
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:22 am
by NabakovNabakov
zu_Faul wrote:Nocmen wrote:I knew that the random stage for me had ended when I started suspecting NN. However, I did not realize that I had left my vote on him from random when I FoSed him. By the time I realized it however, he was no longer at the top of my suspicion.
Possible distancing from NN.
<snip>
NabakovNabakov wrote:Nocmen wrote:I made my argument a little back towards Nabakov, but it was mostly to go about testing the waters to see how everyone would respond. I realized later though that I still had my random vote on him, so i went and unvoted. Towards Draux, as mentioned in my last post, I find him somewhat scummy in his "is random voting over" post. However, this sort of looks like the style Draux plays with, so I really can't infer anything from that.
Basically, I'm stuck here saying that I want to see more regarding Draux and Nabakov before I think either is scummy. If anything, I want to look more towards Yosarian and Porochaz, as something just seems off about their posts.
Wait, are you still holding over that bullshit point you brought up against me on Page 2? What more would you like to see of me?
Distancing.
<snip>
Yes, I have somtimes been hostile to Nocmen. Nocmen has sometimes been hostile to me. Does that really make us scumbuddies who have some sort of distancing fetish?
To put it a different way, you have distanced from the following people:
Nocmen
Myself
Yos
Qman
Gorrad
On that note:
@The Fonz/Nocmen (especially Nocmen): What was so great about zu faul's posts?
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:49 am
by Nocmen
The only post I really liked of ZF was 193, where he went and stated my opinion of how this game should be played. Before that, especially post 191, a lot of his quotes were taken out of context.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 1:56 am
by zu_Faul
NabakovNabakov wrote:zu_Faul wrote:Nocmen wrote:I knew that the random stage for me had ended when I started suspecting NN. However, I did not realize that I had left my vote on him from random when I FoSed him. By the time I realized it however, he was no longer at the top of my suspicion.
Possible distancing from NN.
<snip>
NabakovNabakov wrote:Nocmen wrote:I made my argument a little back towards Nabakov, but it was mostly to go about testing the waters to see how everyone would respond. I realized later though that I still had my random vote on him, so i went and unvoted. Towards Draux, as mentioned in my last post, I find him somewhat scummy in his "is random voting over" post. However, this sort of looks like the style Draux plays with, so I really can't infer anything from that.
Basically, I'm stuck here saying that I want to see more regarding Draux and Nabakov before I think either is scummy. If anything, I want to look more towards Yosarian and Porochaz, as something just seems off about their posts.
Wait, are you still holding over that bullshit point you brought up against me on Page 2? What more would you like to see of me?
Distancing.
<snip>
Yes, I have somtimes been hostile to Nocmen. Nocmen has sometimes been hostile to me. Does that really make us scumbuddies who have some sort of distancing fetish?
To put it a different way, you have distanced from the following people:
Nocmen
Myself
Yos
Qman
Gorrad
See, that's the difference. If you do it to some people it's normal. But if it's only two persons and mutual, then it is a connection.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:13 am
by The Fonz
NabakovNabakov wrote:
On that note:
@The Fonz/Nocmen (especially Nocmen): What was so great about zu faul's posts?
I stated that I disagree with them in their entirety. Therefore, I obviously
don't
think there's anything great about them at all. I'm considering revoting ZF on the basis of them.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:40 am
by zu_Faul
The Fonz wrote:NabakovNabakov wrote:
On that note:
@The Fonz/Nocmen (especially Nocmen): What was so great about zu faul's posts?
I stated that I disagree with them in their entirety. Therefore, I obviously
don't
think there's anything great about them at all. I'm considering revoting ZF on the basis of them.
Why? Because I'm actually bringing up points instead of sitting on my ass, waiting for this day to end?
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:48 pm
by Porochaz
right Im in birthday zone atm so I will either post tomorrow or tuesday... I'll do a reread and a fairly shortish post I imagine and will answer any questions people may have...
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:37 pm
by NabakovNabakov
The Fonz wrote:NabakovNabakov wrote:
On that note:
@The Fonz/Nocmen (especially Nocmen): What was so great about zu faul's posts?
I stated that I disagree with them in their entirety. Therefore, I obviously
don't
think there's anything great about them at all. I'm considering revoting ZF on the basis of them.
*smacks forehead*
I thought your post read odd. I'll try not to forget the "dis" next time.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:39 am
by Yosarian2
Hmm. Still suspicious of Zu_faul, he's still not a bad lynch for today, but I think I'm going to go on gut here and switch votes.
unvote:Zu_Faul
Vote:Nocmen
Most of his posting has been either tangensial or irrelevent or active lurking. He really hasn't said anything at all in January; a couple of times, he's more or less said that we should just "not talk about the rules and hope no on gets killed", which dosn't make much sense to me; he's made some vauge wishy-washy comments about Zu while leaving his vote there, first saying
Nocmen wrote:I liked ZF's last post, but as Yos pointed out, a good amount of his first post was taken out of context.
Then saying he needs to re-read, then saying
Nocmen wrote:
The only post I really liked of ZF was 193, where he went and stated my opinion of how this game should be played. Before that, especially post 191, a lot of his quotes were taken out of context.
Which kind of contradicts his only other content post this month, and dosn't really say anything either. And the rest of his posts are almost completly useless. I think he's scum.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:48 am
by Nocmen
I don't think.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:40 am
by Gorrad
Well, Nocem's made a good post. I completely believe that.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:44 am
by Thestatusquo
The "She's got a silk dress and healthy breasts that bounce...On his italian leather sofa" Votecount.
Nocmen 2 (pete d Yosarian2)
Zu Faull 5 ( qman nabakovnabakov nocmen gorrad poro)
gorrad 1 (fonz)
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:27 am
by Porochaz
Ok due to an unfortunate mishap with some stairs my stuff will be delayed... hopefully just for a day...
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:46 am
by zu_Faul
I'd be ok with lynching either gorrad or Nocmen.
Their last two posts are not pro-town at all.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:47 am
by zu_Faul
Lurker whores. All of you.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:55 am
by Nocmen
I'm a whore, but not a lurker kind. More of a man-whore persay.
ZF is already at 5 votes eh?