Mafiascum.net

Which is well and good, except that I'm not saying she's scum. I'm saying she's slightly more likely to be scum than you are, and as you are not at all likely to be scum, I don't think she is scum.

I repeat: I AM STILL QUITE CERTAIN THAT SCUM IS INE AND Z.

VT.

My turn now?

Well okay, that's fair...I just don't get why you would refer someone to a case that doesn't even convince YOU she's scum as something that's supposed to convince OTHERS that she's scum. You even threw in an indignant "Yeah well I know you'll disagree with everything" as if you DO think the case is good, except now you're in here saying you don't think she's scum - that you think scum is Inef and Z.

Anyway it doesn't matter much, it's just the indignation forced me to go revisit the case and I gave my thoughts on it (because you got shitty with me for not doing that earlier )

Sure go for it.

VT

phew

@Ineffective: The whole AA9 thing was rushed-by-time-vote. I knew she plays like that every time, but time was running out and lynching somebody is better than ending up with no-lynch.

For reasons I stated earlier that basically confirms you as town to me feryl - if you were scum you could have ended this D3 securing a mislynch on both me and GM if GM is town.

Inef doesn't have that luxury because there's a mild amount of suspicion on him and he's not as universally recognized as town as you are...but you're 100% town to me now. No pressure.

Also I had Eye bit more town than AA9 at that time.

Z our last claim I believe.

In post 2053, VisceraEyes wrote:Well okay, that's fair...I just don't get why you would refer someone to a case that doesn't even convince YOU she's scum as something that's supposed to convince OTHERS that she's scum. You even threw in an indignant "Yeah well I know you'll disagree with everything" as if you DO think the case is good, except now you're in here saying you don't think she's scum - that you think scum is Inef and Z.

Anyway it doesn't matter much, it's just the indignation forced me to go revisit the case and I gave my thoughts on it (because you got shitty with me for not doing that earlier )

Because I'm too lazy to look for something more recently eh and I don't believe in making assertions and not backing them up at least a little.

In post 2060, VisceraEyes wrote:Z our last claim I believe.

How in the hell did that happen?

inb4 copclaim

In post 2063, GuyInFreezer wrote:inb4 copclaim

Do something please...your penchant for stopping in to throw in one-liners while the rest of us are trying to figure out the game is getting old and starting to smack of relieved scum.

In post 1956, Mac wrote:

GiF's forced content

In post 1428, GuyInFreezer wrote:@GM: I see your points. It makes me want to have a conversation with eye now

Mac's post about "hey I could've framed you" post seems odd to me.

"I could've done it but I didn't!" Line of stuff feels like he's deliberately saying it to distance people from thinking that he might do it.

In post 1436, GuyInFreezer wrote:

In post 1414, Mac wrote:I don't think Deras wanted me dead, did he?

Regardless, speculating NK's is stupid in my opinion.

I could just as easily accuse you of killing Deras and setting up me/GM/Eye for it, or anyone else in the thread for that matter.

Pointless.

I was talking about this post right here. Especially the bolded part.
Explain to me how I misrep'd you on this bolded part.

In post 1440, GuyInFreezer wrote:Hmm.

Reading back, I don't know what I was doing in there either.
I've been posting some terrible stuffs lately and I blame it on my fever that stayed for few days.

Pretty quick retreat when he realised that no one was going to jump onto this

More like I know to back off when I realize the path I'm going is shit.

In post 1471, GuyInFreezer wrote:Also I would really like to know how the hell I'm his strong townread when I'm not doing much.

self admits he is not doing much at all

And your point is?

In post 1711, GuyInFreezer wrote:

In post 1709, Mac wrote:Again, would prefer time to post my thoughts because tomorrow will be lylo so hang fire until tuesday at least.

Hmm. How did I miss this part?

continues to try and protray me as saying bad things without EVER following up on it.

I just quoted that because I literally missed that part of the line. That was it. And then GM pointed something out of it.

In post 1724, GuyInFreezer wrote:

In post 1723, goodmorning wrote:

In post 1720, Mac wrote:You are not lynched yet...?

No, but I'm going to keep doing final thoughts as the fancy strikes me.

Hopefully I won't be the lynch today

, but I'll probably be the kill tonight.

Explain yourself on this one because it awfully looks like a scumslip.

In post 1728, GuyInFreezer wrote:'cause I see no reason why claimed PR should be worried about getting lynched if he/she's real PR.

never follows up on this either after I call him out for it.

I don't remember you calling me out for it.

Gif plz provide a link with an example of this with you flipping town after the lynch

hmm? I've never been lynched before except for the one that I semi-replaced out.

oh. You're talking about EM?

It got scrolled down so the link is gone. (Unless there's a way to find it)

RE: GM
Tbh i would have voted a lurker d1... It is much more appealing that voting a rager.

Gif there is a search feature

Oh on EM.... Hmmmm nvm....

If it is comp lobby you can search by round even if its a redheart... If its training lobby stop co-opting that shithole

In post 2058, VisceraEyes wrote:For reasons I stated earlier that basically confirms you as town to me feryl - if you were scum you could have ended this D3 securing a mislynch on both me and GM if GM is town.

Inef doesn't have that luxury because there's a mild amount of suspicion on him and he's not as universally recognized as town as you are...but you're 100% town to me now. No pressure.

If I were scum, I would almost certainly have chosen an easier path than that today.