Mafiascum.net

In post 2073, chkflip wrote:Mar, lining up lynches is a scum tell y/n?

chkflip wrote:If it helps with people's reads you're more than welcome to knock me off. We don't need too many questionables in limlo.

Almost50 wrote:

In post 2049, Marashu wrote:Ok, but with the gamestate the way it is, why would agreeing with chk/PP bring suspicion onto Hiraki? Likewise, why is standing out like this not drawing attention and raising suspicions?

I don't fully get the question (or rather.. I'm not sure I do, so please rephrase it if this is not what you're asking).

Q: Why would agreeing with chk/PP bring suspicion onto Hiraki?

A: I didn't say he was agreeing with them (and he is not, because -to my understanding- PP has Chk/Hiraki over A50/dram in his solve, and chk has PP/dram over A50/Hiraki). What i am saying is Hiraki -maybe- knows both PP/Chk are Town (because HE is the remaining Goon), and by declaring me/dram as his solve he is absolving himself of the miselimination about to fall on either of Chk/PP. he shoots you tonight and tomorrow he continues his push on me?dram while the survivor of Chk/PP pushes for dram/Hiraki; respectively. I should be on said survivor and so should dram (at least that's how it looked like back then), so he has a chance to quick!hammer once both I and dram had voted.

Q: Why is standing out like this not drawing attention and raising suspicions?

A: I am assuming you're asking about my changed stance?? If so, because I only considered Hiraki as a consequence to his odd PoE. I clearly had him down as Town earlier.

PP also brought to attention the fact Hiraki also was against the Chemist Elimination. From my own PoV it was the Elimination that would end the game on the spot. I didn't even pay much attention to analyzing anything else at the time because i thought the game was over, so -in retrospect- it was an odd stance too.

I am not saying Hiraki is 100% Scum here (I always struggle to read him properly) but I am now thinking he very well could be.

In post 2077, Marashu wrote:Depends on the context. In previous games I, as scum, have seen others, as town, do it and get called out for it. I can see why it can be a scumtell - only scum know if there will be a next day or not - but it's a fine line between lining up for an elimination and asserting a solve. Also, isn't pushing for no elim tomorrow the same deal?

In post 30, Almost50 wrote:

In post 24, TripleHaven wrote:As you can tell, I didn't read the OP

Bad practice

VOTE: TripleHaven

In post 1532, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1486, PenguinPower wrote:VOTE: A50

In post 1487, teacher wrote:VOTE: a50

VOTE: A50

I trust you two

In post 1546, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1540, dramonic wrote:Almost get your ass back on Jake.
@Dann: Who said I was playing in good faith?

VOTE: Jake

Note: I want RCE more now though

In post 2053, Hiraki wrote:if im scum, why don't i just do this and vote chkflp?

In post 2077, Marashu wrote:Why would Hiraki agreeing with a {chk/PP} solve make him suspicious?

In post 2077, Marashu wrote:Why would Hiraki making a move against the {chk/PP} solve instead of sheeping it not draw attention?

In post 2081, chkflip wrote:Actally. Yo, dram. Remember the "partner vote in rvs" tell?

In post 30, Almost50 wrote:

In post 24, TripleHaven wrote:As you can tell, I didn't read the OP

Bad practice

VOTE: TripleHaven

Floats on that for the longest, then an

actual

showing of LAMIST.

In post 1532, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1486, PenguinPower wrote:VOTE: A50

In post 1487, teacher wrote:VOTE: a50

VOTE: A50

I trust you two

Then, when questioned on his shit, ezpz townpoints.

In post 1546, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1540, dramonic wrote:Almost get your ass back on Jake.
@Dann: Who said I was playing in good faith?

VOTE: Jake

Note: I want RCE more now though

It's definitely 50. My bad dram. I should read more often.

In post 267, Almost50 wrote:

In post 251, Menalque wrote:I’d like to see crush slot post and I still want to hear from dunn and A50

I know this is the same session (at least for me) but I want you to NOT expect much from me at this time still. You know well (ar at least should) that I don't enter the game guns blazing (unless I am a replacement who got it with lots of substance readily available). You should be happy I am -at least- not meme'ing and shitposting enough. My mind is "elsewhere" for now, but I am "watching from the sideline" and will probably jump in sometime soon.

In post 431, Almost50 wrote:It started with y vote on him in RVS (which was semi-serious). Not reading the OP is bad and especially so coming from someone who is "new to the site". Then I didn't like his tone and his responses strike me as manufactured (as in.. text book responses). I don't have a better target to vote right now, and I like dram for town, so this is where I want my vote to be still.

In post 2093, Almost50 wrote:Can you read between the brackets? It was a Semi-Serious vote (as serious as you can get on PAGE ONE).

In post 2088, Almost50 wrote:1- That wasn't RVS. It was a legit vote.

In post 2092, Almost50 wrote:

In post 431, Almost50 wrote:It started with y vote on him in RVS (which was semi-serious). Not reading the OP is bad and especially so coming from someone who is "new to the site". Then I didn't like his tone and his responses strike me as manufactured (as in.. text book responses). I don't have a better target to vote right now, and I like dram for town, so this is where I want my vote to be still.

In post 2082, dramonic wrote:@Chk: If you wanna use that tell I'm a WW

In post 2088, Almost50 wrote:2- I wasn't "questioned". I was TOLD TO get my vote back there.

In post 2088, Almost50 wrote:@Hiraki: Regardless of your true alignment, congrats ion having messed up the game even more. If you're Scum; that was HILARIOUS play. If you're Town... no comment.

In post 2097, Hiraki wrote:why say this if you SR me lol