Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:07 am
Cool.
This is an inaccurate statement.In post 2065, Titus wrote:Your vote came after Cephrir which was with T3 at 5.
This is an accurate statement followed up by a questionIn post 2066, PenguinPower wrote:but why call out me or norwe and not Bell? Bell shifted it from [5] T3/[4] mastina to [5]mastina/[4] T3.
This is a deflection instead of answering the question now that it has been showing your original statement was inaccurate.In post 2067, Titus wrote:1) Why me = fry me.
Yet another inaccurate statement.In post 2067, Titus wrote:2) Your "consensus" about Riverclan came after Bell's vote.
Any lim is better than no lim, and I wasn't convinced another wagon could build up steam in 24 hours on a weekend. I had expressed willingness to move over in the PT to make sure something goes through. That, and town reads that I trusted were scumreading mastina so I was starting to doubt.In post 1975, catboi wrote: Marashu - can you explain why you went from having mastina as town to being willing to vote her?
1) He basically lied about his wagon position.In post 2079, Cephrir wrote:What makes you so sure?
Would u like to share what you found with the class
1.)No, I looked at the two votecounts from the mod and was incorrect.In post 2084, Titus wrote:1) He basically lied about his wagon position.In post 2079, Cephrir wrote:What makes you so sure?
2) When I corrected him, he turned attention to bell.
3) His mastina vote is sheeping the river clan naked.
4) T3 was a lazy no info vote yesterday but now suddenly is worth a naked vote as the wagon creeps up.
5) He shades my attention on him and his behavior as deflection from Bell.
I just... I... nevermind.
do you have any thoughts on the gameIn post 2087, Marashu wrote:I just... I... nevermind.
Am I dense?In post 2087, Marashu wrote:I just... I... nevermind.
I think it's saying don't tunnel on side scum when we have a scum wagoned.In post 2087, Marashu wrote:I just... I... nevermind.
Loyal to a fault. What can I say?In post 2091, fireisredsir wrote:i think its just a laser pointer joke lmao thats a very generous interpretation titus
which side and whyIn post 2076, Cephrir wrote:That exchange did not give me good vibes
I had thought that, if scum was among leaders, they would likely have NK'd whoever got the promotion. If Charloux is scum here, he might have proposed this as fact. This feels more like a backpedal than poor phrasing. But on the other hand, I don't think Charloux had reason to believe it was true. So I don't understand the point of this.In post 2018, Charloux wrote:In post 1997, Cephrir wrote:...was this known or did you out it for no reasonIn post 1970, Charloux wrote:Well there's also the warrior ceremony provides 1-shot bp.Ah i can see how you misunderstood because i phrased it poorly. We were talking about scum being among leaders and i said it's unlikely because we can't protect the promoted people then gave a plausible theory pp came up with which can justify there being scum among leaders.In post 1998, Dannflor wrote:actually wait how was this knownIn post 1997, Cephrir wrote:...was this known or did you out it for no reasonIn post 1970, Charloux wrote:Well there's also the warrior ceremony provides 1-shot bp.
this is not public information to the leaders afaik
Didn't have the intention to state it as a fact, sorry.
2nd. But I’m not sure why.In post 2076, Cephrir wrote:That exchange did not give me good vibes
Yes. Might be a bit slow because of trick-or-treaters but I'll get my thoughts out.In post 2088, fireisredsir wrote:do you have any thoughts on the gameIn post 2087, Marashu wrote:I just... I... nevermind.
I am dense okIn post 2091, fireisredsir wrote:i think its just a laser pointer joke lmao thats a very generous interpretation titus