Page 86 of 141
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 7:18 am
by Battle Mage
In post 2123, iamausername wrote:don't see any reason for scum!BM to make this play, and i don't see any way this day doesn't end in a Taylor execution.
will withhold my vote for now, because it's probably worth waiting for everyone to check in before we power this through, but i don't think there's a need to draw out this day beyond that.
the only reason I think scum!BM makes this play is to bus my fellow scum!taylor to earn towncred. Although as I've got form for that, it doesn't seem like a good strategy anymore. plus it'd be a bit mean to Taylor, who on a personal level I like.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 7:23 am
by Battle Mage
In post 2117, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i also dont like how BM claims and then immediately makes it so he cant be counterclaimed
I mean that's fair. I just didn't want to out another town investigative. Erring on the side of caution.
No, I didn't send you any message last night. I assume that's literally against the rules...
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 7:28 am
by Battle Mage
In post 2116, Tayl0r Swift wrote: In post 2113, Battle Mage wrote:Also, just to pre-empt a few possible questions:
Yes, I did claim VT on Day 1. I....lied.
Partly cause I was screwing around, and mostly because I thought it would slightly reduce the chance of me getting NKed.
Yes, I have no reason to fakeclaim here to orchestrate a mis-elim. I think I was a fairly consensus obvtown at the end of yesterday, and by claiming early, it removes any of the WIFOM of "was BM only claiming there to distract from another elim?"
No, I won't reveal any details about the way in which my role is limited - don't want to give scum any more info than necessary.
Yes, largely from a personal standpoint, I'd prefer we didn't spend a whole week toiling over this dayphase, and just elim Taylor quickly, and move on - we haven't had an issue yet with the day not being long enough for people to post reams.
to your first point: lynch all liars
to your second: you werent consensus obvtown, and outing at this point in the day seems like an objectively bad play
third: ok
fourth: in what world is it good for town to rush through lunches? we should take our time and figure out what this means. especially since if we do rush through my lunch today you'll be on the menu tomorrow.
Points of order:
I disagree that it was objectively bad play, but neither of us are really objective in this. Others can judge. And I will continue to not care if people are mean, and play my own style.
I saw how yesterday went - a complete shitshow. Let's just elim scum and move on. These days are fking long with this active playerlist. It's not as if we are gonna be short on time tomorrow. And I want to avoid loads of rolefishing/other PRs outting/the thread getting spammed to the point we can't work out who your buddies are.
With respect, now you are outted scum, we aren't going to learn much more from your interactions today, or from others interactions with you. So let's just move on.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 7:30 am
by Battle Mage
this, pre-claim, doesn't make me feel any worse about a teacher-taylor pairing btw.
what was this about?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:40 am
by Alonzo
VOTE: Taylor
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:41 am
by Alonzo
LaL tomorrow
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:43 am
by Battle Mage
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:47 am
by Alonzo
Eliminate all liars
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:48 am
by Alonzo
Where's noraaas reads?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:48 am
by Datisi
spicey
redirectors/bus drivers/non-sane cops are not normal, so the only way both bm/taylor are town/telling the truth is if taylor's a miller, but considering she didn't claim it day one (nor now), i'm going to big brain assume she's not one
i want to say claiming a guilty right at the start of the day is Bad Play, but last game when i was claiming a guilty, i ended up townlocking scum because of their smart fakeclaim, so who am i to talk
VOTE: taylor E-2
pedit: it means if taylor is green, you're dead tomorrow
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:49 am
by Alonzo
I don't see what Taylor's alignment has to do with it?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:51 am
by Datisi
BM is claiming a cop guilty on her?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:51 am
by Battle Mage
I might be dead tonight - I would be grateful for some Doc-lovin' please!
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:51 am
by Battle Mage
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:53 am
by Datisi
ye, alonzo asked me what her alignment has to do with it, i'm saying if she is green, BM is not getting out of the noose tomorrow
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:54 am
by Battle Mage
In post 2134, Datisi wrote:spicey
redirectors/bus drivers/non-sane cops are not normal, so the only way both bm/taylor are town/telling the truth is if taylor's a miller, but considering she didn't claim it day one (nor now), i'm going to big brain assume she's not one
i want to say claiming a guilty right at the start of the day is Bad Play, but last game when i was claiming a guilty, i ended up townlocking scum because of their smart fakeclaim, so who am i to talk
VOTE: taylor E-2
pedit: it means if taylor is green, you're dead tomorrow
you can have that opinion on whether it was good play - in these circumstances, I think I was definitely right to claim early. It removes any ambiguity and ultimately gets the desired end result. We lost future info potentially, but also I think we have lots to work with already.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:54 am
by Alonzo
Why not scan me if you're so suspicious?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:55 am
by Battle Mage
In post 2139, Datisi wrote:ye, alonzo asked me what her alignment has to do with it, i'm saying if she is green, BM is not getting out of the noose tomorrow
i know, im agreeing with you. im similarly baffled by Alonzo's question.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:56 am
by Battle Mage
i dont know who this is directed at?
also do you wanna explain where you think LAL comes in, if it isn't related to Taylor's flip?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:02 am
by bob3141
In post 2124, Battle Mage wrote: In post 2121, bob3141 wrote:With BM being vague it realy is hard to say. If you are town as i beleived yesterday. Then either he is scum thats making a claim he can row back from. And claim oops. Or just be a fellow towny messing up.
Forgoten how many games i had to follow the rule lynch all liars. One game it caused us to lynch 2 town. Each one claimed a guility on the other. Other game scum used insider info to fake a guilty, got the player lynched and were able to row back out fo it. By claiming a gating.
I'm not going to row back. If Taylor flips town, you can elim me. If there is some shenanigans like a bus driver or whatever, then so be it. It seems unlikely to me, and if we get screwed like that, I'll eat it up.
i dont understand much of the lingo in your last bit, but defer to your brilliance. Lim all liars doesn't really work for me though - I gambit all the time.
I also don't think Taylor flipping scum confirms me as town, as I'm quite capable of bussing her in that spot too.
Yep i just cant see scum faking a guility this soon into the game. Just hope its not a repeat of that game. We ended up losing as we lost 2 mislynches for 1
VOTE: talylor
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:04 am
by Battle Mage
bonus points if someone can hammer before Menalque shows up, because his reaction at missing Day 2 would be hilarious
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:05 am
by teacher
In post 2108, Battle Mage wrote:hmm ok, because we are 85 pages deep already, and I don't want loads more spam to obfuscate things, or to waste lots of time, I'm claiming:
I'm the Cop. I Investigated Taylor last night. Taylor is scum.
VOTE: Taylor Called it!
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:06 am
by Battle Mage
night folks.
DOC - protect me tonight please, thanks.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:06 am
by Datisi
huh.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:06 am
by Gypyx
Boop