Page 89 of 109

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 8:37 am
by GuyInFreezer
VOTE: GiF

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 8:38 am
by fferyllt
interesting.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 9:05 am
by fferyllt
and of course I never did an iso of GiF plus Fropome/Z7.

Maybe there's time before the nightfall post.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 9:23 am
by fferyllt
Fropome's RVS vote was for Revenus. I have meta reason to consider dismissing this as neutral, but still

revenus' first post of the game is to ask Fropome for clarification

Revenus says he's developing town reads on Eye and me

From where Fropome posts all his reads. Revenus is next to last in the list. gm is last.
Revenus: I haven't given any real attention to him, reading me pure town early indicated he was understanding of the content of my posts about lurking, which followed a question to me, and also pointed out a potential pitfall in the "rule of thumb" I outlined which was also worthwhile (though there is a way to address that, cue the mighty GodKill.
Revenus labels one of mac's posts a town post. He did this to a couple of my posts, too. This makes me think that Mac could be town.

explains Z7's errant quote-post he made before posting his reads list. First thing about Z7, and it's been a long time since he mentioned Fropome or replied to him. Like, not since the first few days of Day 1.

Revenus defends Fropome

Will go ahead and post this in case twilight ends before I am done.

From Fropome's side this is less mention of Revenus than was the case with Mac, I think.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 9:23 am
by Mac
Hmmm. Self hammer indicates scum, good news.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 9:26 am
by GuyInFreezer
Well actually I'm VT. I just didn't want to end up in lylo with being easy mislynch.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 9:30 am
by GuyInFreezer
I wish I had more time/motivation to contribute more but my RL issues and finals made me drag behind to the point that I couldn't follow fast enough. Asking for replacement was not an option because I didn't want anyone else to take a burden of catching up 80+ pages.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 9:31 am
by TraceyLyn11
Probably won't be able to get to this until later tonight.

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 6:00 pm
by TraceyLyn11
VOTE COUNT 2.12; FINAL VOTE COUNT OF DAY TWO


[L-4] Z7-852:

[L-4] fferyllt:

[L-2] Mac: (VisceraEyes, Z7-852)

[L-3] Ineffective: (goodmorning)

[L-4] VisceraEyes:

:!:
[
LYNCH
] GuyInFreezer: (Ineffective, fferyllt, Mac, GuyInFreezer)
:!:
[L-4] goodmorning:


Not Voting:
0

Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 6:01 pm
by TraceyLyn11
NIGHT TWO BEGINS!


GuyInFreezer,
Mafia Goon
, has been lynched day two.


  • If you have night actions, please send me your choices via PM or QT if you have one.
  • Night two will end in ((expired on 2013-05-16 00:00:00))

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:00 pm
by TraceyLyn11
DAY THREE BEGINS!


No one died.

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:00 pm
by TraceyLyn11
VOTE COUNT 3.0


[L-4] Z7-852:

[L-4] fferyllt:

[L-4] Mac:

[L-4] Ineffective:

[L-4] VisceraEyes:

[L-4] goodmorning:


Not Voting:
6 (Z7-852, fferyllt, Mac, Ineffective, VisceraEyes, goodmorning)
  • With six alive, it takes four to lynch.
  • Day Three's deadline: June 05, 2013 CST or in (expired on 2013-06-05 00:00:00).
  • V/LA: No one.

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:04 pm
by fferyllt
Who was JK'd and who was protected?

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:38 pm
by Ineffective
In post 2212, fferyllt wrote:Who was JK'd and who was protected?
This

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:40 pm
by Ineffective
I say out it and nl to see what happens

We are at ml+1 so it cant hurt

Unless you want to aim for earning another ml...

VOTE: no one

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 1:33 am
by goodmorning
I jailkept Mac.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 2:07 am
by Mac
To quote yourself: interesting.

That must mean there was either a) a no kill or b) I was targetted.

Obviously there is option C for everyone else but I know it's not true.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 2:16 am
by goodmorning
Or the target was protected by VE. Or, of course, your option C, that you attempted a kill. Lots of options.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 5:41 am
by VisceraEyes
I protected fferyllt

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 5:57 am
by fferyllt
GM, VE you want to talk about your rationales for you night action choices?

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:46 am
by VisceraEyes
Sure. My reasoning for protecting feryllt was...

<3

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:51 am
by fferyllt
In post 2220, VisceraEyes wrote:Sure. My reasoning for protecting feryllt was...

<3
Why did you think I was a likely kill target?

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 7:16 am
by goodmorning
I jailkept Mac because in my opinion he is the likeliest partner of GIF.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 7:22 am
by VisceraEyes
In post 2221, fferyllt wrote:
In post 2220, VisceraEyes wrote:Sure. My reasoning for protecting feryllt was...

<3
Why did you think I was a likely kill target?
You were one of the first to draw attention to GiF (along with Inef later I believe) once the Mac wagon started losing steam. You've been obviously townie all game. You're active to a fault and you're willing to rethink your position in the face of logic.

The better question would be why would you NOT be a likely kill target?

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 7:28 am
by fferyllt
In post 2223, VisceraEyes wrote:
In post 2221, fferyllt wrote:
In post 2220, VisceraEyes wrote:Sure. My reasoning for protecting feryllt was...

<3
Why did you think I was a likely kill target?
You were one of the first to draw attention to GiF (along with Inef later I believe) once the Mac wagon started losing steam. You've been obviously townie all game. You're active to a fault and you're willing to rethink your position in the face of logic.

The better question would be why would you NOT be a likely kill target?
because exposed power roles.