Mafiascum.net

In post 2223, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:What is "fake meta?"

Exactly what PR said.
Made up meta on me saying that they have experience with me of WK a Scum buddy.
Which is false.

In post 2216, Vedith wrote:My debate isn't that I'm lynched on it, as I didn't argue the comments for that.
I just don't think you believe this.

That's a weird way to discredit me.

Even if my logic is flawed, I believe what I'm saying. Why would I lie? If you think I'm scum, call me scum. Don't say shit like that.

I wouldn't at all be surprised if you saw your buddy going down and then hard defended her knowing I might town read you for it because I just saw you do the same thing in another game and you wouldn't do that in front of me

In post 2225, Vedith wrote:

In post 2223, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:What is "fake meta?"

Exactly what PR said.
Made up meta on me saying that they have experience with me of WK a Scum buddy.
Which is false.

I mean indirect experience is a thing

In post 2224, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:

In post 2222, Ankamius wrote:

In post 2215, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Shoshin isn't trying to read the game and build cases => she asks questions but doesn't reach conclusions

are there any especially bad examples of this?

I mean her ISO has very few particular conclusions in it, if that's what you're asking. 8-ball she was very decisive, picked stances and took them

the only memorable stance i remember getting from her this game is that I'm town. :/ It's particularly hard to prove the absence of something otherwise I'd get you qutoes

I mean were there any examples of it looking really weird that she didn't get any conclusions from what she was asking

what caused you to pick up on that

Also even if it's "fake meta" it doesn't really invalidate anything right?
Since, well, you clearly did it once.

In post 2227, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:I mean indirect experience is a thing

That's not how the worded and you know it.
Then tried to play the "I don't want to out my alt" shit.

If you're not going to back up meta comments then don't say it.

vedith this is the part where I WK you right

Semantics etc.

In post 2229, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:Also even if it's "fake meta" it doesn't really invalidate anything right?
Since, well, you clearly did it once.

I have experience where you had this opinion and was Scum.

In post 2231, Ankamius wrote:vedith this is the part where I WK you right

No

In post 2229, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:Also even if it's "fake meta" it doesn't really invalidate anything right?
Since, well, you clearly did it once.

Do you even realise what meta is?

In post 2233, Vedith wrote:

In post 2229, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:Also even if it's "fake meta" it doesn't really invalidate anything right?
Since, well, you clearly did it once.

I have experience where you had this opinion and was Scum.

Jokes on you, I never rolled mafia ever.
But then, I only played two games.

Well one game. This one isn't finished.

In post 2234, Vedith wrote:

In post 2231, Ankamius wrote:vedith this is the part where I WK you right

No

:(

In post 2235, Vedith wrote:Do you even realise what meta is?

Meta is nothing more than a players' play information based on their previous games.

In post 2236, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:Jokes on you, I never rolled mafia ever.
But then, I only played two games.

I have experience on your alt.
I don't want to go into detail as I don't want to out my alt but you tried to use this excuse as Scum then too.

Why are people calling me alt account?

In post 2239, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:

In post 2235, Vedith wrote:Do you even realise what meta is?

Meta is nothing more than a players' play information based on their previous games.

Exactly.
The way it's said is that it's something I do often.
The response on alt shit means they are saying they were in a game with me.
They weren't in 2057 even if they imply it.

So it's fake meta.
Why the fuck would they be making it up?

In post 2241, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:Why are people calling me alt account?

I'm just making a point.
Obviously I have no reason to think that your an alt.

In post 2243, Vedith wrote:

In post 2239, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:

In post 2235, Vedith wrote:Do you even realise what meta is?

Meta is nothing more than a players' play information based on their previous games.

Exactly.
The way it's said is that it's something I do often.
The response on alt shit means they are saying they were in a game with me.
They weren't in 2057 even if they imply it.

So it's fake meta.
Why the fuck would they be making it up?

I took it as "he could do it," not "he does it often."

My question was "would he WK his scummate like that?"
He said "Yes."

In post 2187, Reiuji Utsuho wrote:I'm not sure. Would mafia openly WK scummate like that?

In post 2188, Prince of Renais wrote:in my experience with vedith, yes.

Nope I don't see it.
Why the fuck are you defending that?

ok

let's be real here

wtf is this argument

Like it was never a question of frequency. It was about possibility.

Edit: you just think I'm defending it because you clearly saw a different meaning than what I saw.