Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 8:22 am
i mean, technically, as the bus, i rolled third party
triple commas there indicate you are overly concerned with how your writing is viewed
you just subconsciously scum-claimed
objection!
Lovebird’s interactions felt weird. I’m sad to say, atm, I have no other scumreads. Also, iirc, the deadline is still a week away, so it’s not like I need to rush out a vote.In post 166, rb wrote:yeah same as above, do you actually scumread lovebird?In post 151, mcqueen wrote:no, this is betterIn post 144, rb wrote:at first i preferred akarin, but after this page i also like this
VOTE: Elliot
VOTE: Lovebird
I doubt Lovebird and Eliot are bussing here, so if one flips scum, to me the other is cleared. And out of the two, this is where I feel most comfortable applying pressure/ voting for the moment.
I also don't understand why Eliot is aquiring a wagon while Lovebird has received minimum pressure.
shouldn't you be more concerned about actually voting someone you think will flip scum, rather than putting a false sense of important on lovebird/elliot interactions?
I’m not onboard that this is an accurate scumread. It’s very similar to tunneling, and while Eliot may be scum, I’m not putting faith in it off of this premise.In post 177, Sashaddin wrote:Lovebird kept talking with other people. Elliott has 80% of his iso only speaking to Lovebird. I have been accused of this when I was scum once and barely got out of it.In post 172, rb wrote:sure go ahead and say it
i, use, comma,s, for, emph,a,sis,In post 229, rb wrote:sorry, for, my, bad, english, pls, forgive, me,
It didn’t feel like scum theatrics, that’s whyIn post 180, Flubbernugget wrote:I think you're too quick to deny a possibility of scum theatrics but otherwise I agree hereIn post 151, mcqueen wrote:no, this is betterIn post 144, rb wrote:at first i preferred akarin, but after this page i also like this
VOTE: Elliot
VOTE: Lovebird
I doubt Lovebird and Eliot are bussing here, so if one flips scum, to me the other is cleared. And out of the two, this is where I feel most comfortable applying pressure/ voting for the moment.
I also don't understand why Eliot is aquiring a wagon while Lovebird has received minimum pressure.
plz explain your TR on me
plz explain your TR on me
so this kinda makes me curious considering at the time of the post lovebird asked maybe two full direct questionsIn post 130, Eliot Ness wrote:I don't like the way you're conducting business here, lovebird. You're asking lots of questions that make me wonder why you asked them. Asking questions alone does not make you towny. Analysis does. What is your vote on us for, exactly? What are your actual opinions beyond just the "This is towny, this is not?" Any scum can ask questions to look town, and I think that's exactly what you're doing here.
i feel like you're deriving far too many conclusions from a fairly insignificant postIn post 134, Eliot Ness wrote:This is the question that pinged us.In post 53, Lovebird wrote:How is it stupid?In post 39, BuJaber wrote:The claim is stupid if town, it's way more likely to be from scum.
If you’re town here, you should be asking why it is scummy, not why it is stupid.
1. It assumes the person is town, which is concerning
2. A Townie would be more interested in why it’s more likely to come from scum and
3. Because of this, it looks more like a filler question than genuine scumhunting, and combined with the naked vote on us along with the lack of reasoning of any reads, looks like someone trying to seem like they are busy without actually digging in to any stances.
we're not anymore thoughIn post 245, Eyes without a face wrote:I might as well go on a coma if we continue to discuss the comma as scum hunting tool
YesIn post 244, Clemency wrote:i'm doing this thing where i actually answer questions directed at me
you guys like it?
why?In post 244, Clemency wrote:i'm doing this thing where i actually answer questions directed at me
you guys like it?