Actually, I am the tiebreaking vote. Looks like I'll have to reread Ben's earlier posts to see if he was trying to do the same there and his possible motivation if true. Rannygazoo's case is simple though so I like it better all things considered.
Part of me says watch it be S v S and I am just needing to keep town together.
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:27 am
by benhalkum
In post 226, Titus wrote:Actually, I am the tiebreaking vote. Looks like I'll have to reread Ben's earlier posts to see if he was trying to do the same there and his possible motivation if true. Rannygazoo's case is simple though so I like it better all things considered.
Part of me says watch it be S v S and I am just needing to keep town together.
You should find it's me doing the same thing I did yesterday, asking logical questions to see which responses I get so I can make a more informed decision about which way to vote.
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:28 am
by benhalkum
I trust Battle Mages thought process at least, so hoping to hear from them today.
In post 36, Battle Mage wrote:my initial suggestion would be...it's very early to draw a conclusion one way or another about Titus' alignment in this game, especially based on the 1-game meta cited and given she only has a couple of non-AI posts.
And this needed saying because?
All you're doing is stopping scum from whiteknighting me based on flimsy evidence and exposing themselves.
...what's the reason behind your entrance being a tad on the aggressive side? I've previously known you to be a lot more moderate and composed as town.
To actually respond to your point, I didn't stop anyone doing anything, by giving a view on something which had already happened.
I'm in a no bullshit mood and I am sick of getting nightkilled day one and then praying people solve without me.
Sick of being night killed on day one but ok with making yourself a target?
I mean, unless you know you're safe at night
Well, if I am making myself a target, then I am obvtowning.
However, no one nightkills the class know it all.
So therefore my goal is to be right, vocal and brash. This prevents scum from lynching or killing me. Well if they do, town will know exactly where I stand and can sheep it.
Making yourself a target and obvtowning are not necessarily the same thing. If you play in a way which is vocal and brash, you may be a target even if you are not obvtown, as I have learnt in the past. The idea that you wouldn't be NKed at some point in this game is a strange one to be peddling at this stage, especially if you plan to deliberately play in a way where scum might be more likely to kill you. Are you trying to sow the seeds early to justify why you dont get killed?
None of that is what I am saying though. Listen for the love of all that is good, stop typing and start thinking.
I'm not saying I'll never be nightkilled. I am saying I am going to force scum into a bad situation if they kill me night 1 because I am sick of it happening.
made me think you know who scum is
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 5:22 am
by superbowl9
In post 218, Flavor Leaf wrote:So maybe friendly rivalry would be the best thing, which means I hope you're scum here, because I will catch you.
In post 226, Titus wrote:Actually, I am the tiebreaking vote. Looks like I'll have to reread Ben's earlier posts to see if he was trying to do the same there and his possible motivation if true. Rannygazoo's case is simple though so I like it better all things considered.
Part of me says watch it be S v S and I am just needing to keep town together.
You should find it's me doing the same thing I did yesterday, asking logical questions to see which responses I get so I can make a more informed decision about which way to vote.
The catch is here is that I am disinclined to think anything you did was "logical" as I felt my behavior explanation was perfectly clear.
As for whether that was your goal is something I'll have to determine.
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:22 am
by Titus
*behavior and explanation
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:24 am
by Titus
@non imh, what about that post made you think I knew the scumteam?
Why are you not commenting on any of the recent content?
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:26 am
by Titus
In fact, your ISO goes backwards from commenting on Alch's 98 to my 64. That makes your posting look a lot less genuine.
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:37 am
by Titus
VOTE: Benhalkum
47 doesn't look like a question that will help you sort at all. Instead it's just outright shade for my aggressive behavior.
So Ranny ben and superbowl contains at least one scum, with sb being the least likely.
Non is probably scum.
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:41 am
by Titus
In post 52, benhalkum wrote:Not sure that makes me think you're town. I don't think we've played together so unsure of how you typically play so I'll watch others who have.
In post 73, benhalkum wrote:I just want to point out, just because Titus is saying I'm town doesn't mean I automatically agree she is.
Really weird mentioning it more than once.
The paranoid part of me makes me think if she flips scum it's an attempt to get me targeted next.
That or it's an attempt to get me to lay off my suspecion as why would I want to suspect someone who's baking me as town?
These two posts are inconsistent. If you were waiting to see how others with meta react, then why do you promptly discard it?
I agree. The strongest impression I get out of these starting pages is that Titus is Town.
what other impressions did you get
It bothers me these are the only two post from them.
BM and I went into detail with Titus yesterday on the "NK thing" but a lot of the other players are town reading her. However, you simply gloss over that and just say it bothered you.
Why?
I know why it bothered BM and I. But this seems SUS as hell to me.
Could be distancing. There is no follow-up but that's hard to do with an inactive slot. Punt on this for now.
