Due to a mod error the original version of this VC originally showed loftwing voting house.
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:49 pm
by Kazyan
Everyone does tunneling/confbias shit tbh
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:51 pm
by House
A poorly explained vote is better than a stab in the dark vote.
Wanna give it another shot?
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:52 pm
by Gorkington
Kazyan wrote:Everyone does tunneling/confbias shit tbh
meh im usually particularly bad for it.
i try to make up for it by engaging in a way that moves the game in a useful way.
is there a particular reason youre engaging the wagon indirectly (ie: my case post/not picking directly at what you dislike about house's vote)?
why would the wagon's speed be surprising given the way that i pushed it?
if you read his iso in that, he is on me like white on rice but I troll him into hammering me and he ends up eating some rope cuz I'm actually a beloved princess.
his decision to let me slip away on D1 is like pretty important and changes the course of the game somewhat and you can kinda tell from his ragey getting elimmed flailing that it burns him in his soul.
So I decided to open up with the same trolly ass approach to reaction test him and his response to me in this game feels like he's dismissing me as lol-town-troll rather than suspicion which makes me think he's informed of my alignment aka scumbag
I never claimed a read on you
I didn't say you claimed a read on me. I said the way you interacted with me felt like you were treating me as lol-troll-town.
In post 157, Gorkington wrote:ya.
im not sure why you would subsequently vote him for behaviour in that period if you thought he was slayer gambitting though.
He wasn't. Pooky did something very akin to a Slayer's Gambit, so i was watching the interactions.
Initially, unwnd seemed like he was going water Pooky for the claim, but when he started why he wasn't going to vote for Pooky, I misread his post as saying he didn't want to
attract attention to himself
, and I was like, okay then... that's a scum claim.
wtf is a slayers gambit
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:56 pm
by Gorkington
its playing badly on purpose to get reactions, usually with the intent that mafia will vote for you because youre an easy target.
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:56 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 180, unwnd wrote:Very rude of you to give me attention Dann and then vote the person I was hinting that I was sussing.
lol this is so s/s
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:57 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 231, Gorkington wrote:its playing badly on purpose to get reactions, usually with the intent that mafia will vote for you because youre an easy target.
wow im almost insulted
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:57 pm
by Kazyan
In post 227, House wrote:A poorly explained vote is better than a stab in the dark vote.
Wanna give it another shot?
Just for this snideness, no, I'm not gonna elaborate.
In post 157, Gorkington wrote:ya.
im not sure why you would subsequently vote him for behaviour in that period if you thought he was slayer gambitting though.
He wasn't. Pooky did something very akin to a Slayer's Gambit, so i was watching the interactions.
Initially, unwnd seemed like he was going water Pooky for the claim, but when he started why he wasn't going to vote for Pooky, I misread his post as saying he didn't want to
attract attention to himself
, and I was like, okay then... that's a scum claim.
wtf is a slayers gambit
Intentionally being superficially scummy to pick up opportunistic votes, then scumhunting the wagon.
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:58 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 224, Kazyan wrote:Based on how quickly the wagon formed on me and the deal with Gork and Dann, there's maybe one scum on my wagon? VOTE: House?
In post 227, House wrote:A poorly explained vote is better than a stab in the dark vote.
Wanna give it another shot?
Just for this snideness, no, I'm not gonna elaborate.
That wasn't my intent, sorry it came across that way.
Just pointing out that your vote isn't likely to be very effective if you don't support it.
I know, I know, I didn't explain my vote either, but my vote was a sheep & the player I was sheeping DID case you.
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:01 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
House is so transparently townie
the last time i played with the dude he was scum and posted like 3 times total and 2 of them was complaining about how mean we were for posting too much
here he's like turboposting like a madlad
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:02 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
like seriously when he's scum the dude has like 3 posts total and then reps out complaining about how we all have no lives and the game is "moving too fast"
here he's got 57 posts in under a day hahahahahahahahahaha
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:02 pm
by Gorkington
well when you put it in a way that makes me worried ive been stupid for not seeing it up until this point
yeah sure maybe.
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:03 pm
by Kazyan
I mean, if you say "I'm deliberately going to use a different playstyle than my usual way of being town and it's all going according to plan if I get voted", I kind of have to vote for you because that's the exact ass-covering that I used in my one scumgame.
the last time i played with the dude he was scum and posted like 3 times total and 2 of them was complaining about how mean we were for posting too much
here he's like turboposting like a madlad
Okay Gamma Junior, I'll tell you what I tell him every time he leans on that crutch:
I'd have said the same thing in Radio Buzz as either alignment, because the thread was gaining content like a large theme and I have to work all day.
This game started on a weekend, where I have more time.
In Radio Buzz, I was fucking swamped, and didn't have hours to ketchup just to get lost in the noise again.
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:05 pm
by Gorkington
In post 242, Kazyan wrote:I mean, if you say "I'm deliberately going to use a different playstyle than my usual way of being town and it's all going according to plan if I get voted", I kind of have to vote for you because that's the exact ass-covering that I used in my one scumgame.
which post/posts are you referring to here?
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:05 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
ok you can say its about real life time or whatever but some people just aren't interested in playing scum and you're clearly one of them lol
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:06 pm
by House
In post 242, Kazyan wrote:I mean, if you say "I'm deliberately going to use a different playstyle than my usual way of being town and it's all going according to plan if I get voted", I kind of have to vote for you because that's the exact ass-covering that I used in my one scumgame.
Okay.
You're not explaining it for MY benefit. You can't convince a scum that they're scum.
I figured town should hear your thoughts.
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:07 pm
by House
In post 246, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ok you can say its about real life time or whatever but some people just aren't interested in playing scum and you're clearly one of them lol
If you think that, refer to literally any of my other scum games.
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 1:09 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
are u trying to convince me you're scum or are you just offended that I think so badly of your scum game lol
