Here's the thing. I'm not going to support a lynch of fallman until he posts more and I think lynching him based on one post is a bad idea. I think he's the kind of player that will be easy to read after a few posts and I think all the rallying is premature.
Instead, I would like to say that Kdowns, maxwell and OhGodMyLife (preferably one of the last two) are all good lynches and would love one of them to happen today.
First, as I've said before, Firestarter's rack vote was scummy because:
->It was lazy- No real effort put into trying to get a proper read of rack, which doesn't match the amount of effort put into the summary of the first part of the game. This indicates that his effort was going into furthering his scum agenda (wanting to post lots to look town) rather than town motives (wanting to put effort into reading people and discussing reads with others).
->There was little acknowledgement of the abundant rack suspicion at the time- possibly wanting to avoid sheeping.
477: In his response to me he says that if he had reasoning of his own then it's not scummy, when there was pretty much just one line about rack so he hardly had reasons of his own. I would think town more likely to comment that they didn't really have much reasoning and were just jumping on a wagon they thought was good.
He also doesn't think to unvote rack despite obviously not being able to engage in the game. This isn't conclusively scummy, but I think it is a little.
I still think that my suspicion of OGML is hardly the kind of thing he as town would come in and post for, considering his response does nothing to help the town and is basically saying "I'm not responding".
I'll try to explain again without looking at what I said before and hopefully I'll be clearer.
When a townie learns that someone suspects them and is under very little pressure, I think the first thing they would do if they decided to pay any attention to it would be try and work out whether it's coming from town or scum. A lack of content could be considered scummy perhaps, or it could even be considered more town. In a case of low content, as it was here, I wouldn't be surprised if town asked me to expand on my suspicion in an attempt to better read me. However, things that OGML said such as "I'm just going to ignore you because there is nothing to respond to in what you said" is not what I expect town's concerns to be at all. I do not think town would think this. They wouldn't want to ignore someone for the reason he said. It's not what they'd think at all. Instead, it sounds a lot like an awkward scum response, figuring out the best way to counter my suspicion of them and actually displays scum thought processes.
I feel quite happy with what I've said above, so hopefully people can read and respond with what they think.
Things that make me unsure:
-Firestarter's vote on rack seemed perhaps too badly justified to come from scum.
-I liked Firestarter's accusation of Psyche bussing rack.
There's not much behind this one, and I really don't know how to read shotty, but I found his comment about Macros being scummy, scummy at the time because I didn't really believe it. I can't really explain why though.
Also his latest post has a really scummy part that I'm not sure I want to point out right now.
If neither of the above two wagons look viable and I don't begin to read fallman as scum, I will probably reiterate my reasons for wanting a kdowns lynch.
Code_X
: What do you think of LLD's reason for wanting a Fallman lynch?
