Mafiascum.net

In post 2318, Wake1 wrote:

Alyssa the Lamb replaces Golden Robster.

In post 49, Garmr wrote:

In post 31, insomnia wrote:

In post 30, Garmr wrote:

In post 17, Something_Smart wrote:SK here, killing the first person to post each day. Sorry Norweiganboy.

I'm also a SK so i'll VOTE: TrueSoulEnergy

Actual wolfy vote

Nah I am cult leader and making you join tonight. Curious why your still on The through.

In post 467, Garmr wrote:So this is the post that stood out to me after a skim

In post 251, The Fonz wrote:snip

This just seems like a massive misrep it's obvious tse means atleast 1 scum on the wagon. Appear to try and sort tse but in reality do nothing to sort his alignment. I'm leaning more to scum than actual town with a bad take because of the way he also uses the post to suck up to nero and the way his telling TSE to not scum hunt off his wagon.

If you want to help town, look elsewhere, except if you genuinely DO have helpful role info.

This post to means nero isn't scum buddies with the fonz so we can eliminate him from each others scum team.

VOTE: The fonz

In post 672, Garmr wrote:Btw just putting this here for my convenience.

Players that can not be on a scum team with nero.

TSE
The fonz.
Egix
Profii
Hectic.

In post 779, Garmr wrote:Also bob going to add this isn't a normal game in a sense. There's enough scum for scum to hunt opposing scum. So they wouldn't have to fake scum hunting and all the thought process's that go with it. So I doubt any scum this game will fake scum or act differently to their town self when it comes to hunting till an entire team is eliminated. The oddities will come to interactions between certain people.

In post 813, Garmr wrote:In a way I fucking hate all of you right now. I try to actually scum hunt and post to keep discussion and content up and I get scum read because of it. I'm not even in a lynchable position at the momment I'm just ticked i'm not being taken seriously.


Hasn't anyone noticed that the popular opinion is to go yeah garmr scum. But a majority of them have no reasoning or the reasoning is out of place. It makes me think if scum are unsure if i'm actually scum or town but want to keep me in a as a possibility despite the lack of real reasoning.

In post 2334, Nero Cain wrote:I'd shed 0 tears if any of the following wound up dead tonight


kagesong
NorwegianboyEE
Pine
pisskop
Jamelia
Almost50
Not Known 15
QuantumQuasar
insomnia
TrueSoulEnergy
dsjstr
SausasaurusRex
The Fonz
profii
Amrun
Egix96
AaronFrost
clidd
VaultDweller

In post 2350, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:And yes I'm questioning the wagon because it's at L-2 and an ISO search gave me a townread on him

There's not exactly many other avenues of getting into the game

In post 2351, SausasaurusRex wrote:I’m happy with a Black Ranger lynch, but I’ll wait for a claim or something from him before doing anything. Consider this a prod-dodge.

In post 2357, insomnia wrote:I’ll have you know that the slot didn’t post anything to make me town lean them in the slightest and thus not giving a crap about them, so if you’re scum, pressure’s on.

In post 2358, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 2350, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:And yes I'm questioning the wagon because it's at L-2 and an ISO search gave me a townread on him

There's not exactly many other avenues of getting into the game

Expand.

In post 2361, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:

In post 2358, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 2350, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:And yes I'm questioning the wagon because it's at L-2 and an ISO search gave me a townread on him

There's not exactly many other avenues of getting into the game

Expand.

it's nothing that groundbreaking, I just think they've consistently been fine with contributions and had nothing that indicated they cared about being scumread or let it stop them from hunting.

In post 667, tictac wrote:

In post 410, kagesong wrote:

In post 41, Something_Smart wrote:I didn't suggest info lynching? I suggested just playing the game normally, which is probably going to result in a scramble to find a wagon amenable to 26 people and the result is probably going to be a pretty bad lynch... but the events that led to it will still be more useful than a policy lynch.

As of this post, I agree with this position. I'm clearly behind. Taking notes, etc.

In post 411, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:

In post 41, Something_Smart wrote:I didn't suggest info lynching? I suggested just playing the game normally, which is probably going to result in a scramble to find a wagon amenable to 26 people and the result is probably going to be a pretty bad lynch... but the events that led to it will still be more useful than a policy lynch.

Going to agree with this too.

ŵould lynch these, Egix or SS and be happy.
would lynch A50, and do a little dance, always.

would lynch, and go 'meh' if ya flip town: maybe not

all

of the rest of yall?

In post 676, tictac wrote:

In post 469, Drixx wrote:

In post 468, Nero Cain wrote:but there are plenty of town that post reasonless read list. Mastina for instance.

and not gonna lie, I'm still a bit salty.

What do u think of profii?

Go look at the lists KM posted. See if you can spot WHY I pushed them to explain.

At this point their follow up posts trying to dodge explaining are actually far more damning than the problem with the supposed reads.

I've got about 45 minutes till I have to go to work. I'll try and do another pass specifically on profii and see what I see.

Drix would be a goood lunch also.

In post 1205, tictac wrote:Chemist read is also a read and not sarcasm (@dave, tho u used the word 'sarcasm' correctly! so concrats.)

In post 1640, tictac wrote:

In post 1592, AaronFrost wrote:The thing with tictac pointing out Wake's meta felt weird to me, generally weird = scummy. Wake, who is modding the game btw not playing it, is someone who is known to say "I hate Day 1" and then proceeds to lurk for the entire day. Hectic's doing the same thing here, the difference being that Hectic is actually playing the game whereas if he wanted to imitate Wake's playstyle he would just continue to lurk, which he's not. There's no correlation between their play here.

alas, for all my affectations of intellectual superiority i have sadly yet to unlock the elusive secrets of acausal mafia-playing. It is therefore tragically always the case that every single post of mine must be based on those posts that come

earlier

in the cosmic order and

not

on those posts that arrive

later

.

Also, why does the specific focus on 'Wake' matter, since you agree that Hectic was obviously memeing in 862?

In post 1630, Pink Ball wrote:Town hunts is overestimating town, especially on D1, especially on a 50p game. Look how people reacts to posts thinking "gotcha" (

tictac's post about Titus

, you talking about Aaron)

ouch.

also, i can see it's not gonna happen today, so.

In post 804, Chemist1422 wrote:VOTE: NotAJumbleOfNumbers

jumble come back pls

In post 1021, Chemist1422 wrote:UNVOTE: NotAJumbleOfNumbers

jumble if you're around let's talk

In post 1043, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 1022, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:hi i'm around

why are you only interacting with stuff directly relating to you

I find this portion of Chemist ISO hilarious.

VOTE: Chemist1422

In post 2118, tictac wrote:

In post 2117, davesaz wrote:So I wonder if there are scum in the naked vote sheeple?

Is this a real question? I'd be real surprised if all the scumz were among the active growd.
How ya feel about lynching chemist?
dude has meta for getting paralyed as scum, and the little content that he does have is scummy.
I mean if we just wanna get

something

to the noose, then sure, let's listen to a second-hand report from drizz, it's not like the most horrible of all options.
if we wanna lynch scum however, we should:
VOTE: Chemist1422

In post 1578, SausasaurusRex wrote:Sorry, I was gone for a little while. I had thought the reasoning for my vote was obvious, but it appears not. Whilst I am certainly not newbie scum, I am newbie large. I have never before played in a game with over 13 people, and I'm finding it very hard to keep track. I'm struggling with keeping track of everything everyone's saying, but what I can do is have townreads. Whilst I might not be insightful enough to draw my own conclusions, (at least at this stage, once we get more information I promise I'm better), I felt that I could have certain townreads that I trust. They are yet to do anything I have seen as scummy, and so I trust them to put their vote in the right place. Therefore, I followed their conclusions and voted as they did. Please note that this is not sheeping. Sheeping is voting the wagon with the most votes. What I am doing is voting the person that my townreads vote, and also making sure their reasoning doesn't seem illogical before I do so.
Now, about what TheFonz said about me being scum. TheFonz has never before played with me, and so I don't blame him for his lack of knowledge about me. But no matter my alignment, I am always self-conscious. Put it this way: I know that I am definitely town. It is impossible for me to be wrong about this. Therefore, if I get myself lynched, I am helping the anti-town aligned players. Therefore, I should try my hardest not to seem scummy, as that helps me not get lynched. I know this holds for any alignment, but, if you wish, you can look at my meta to see I am always like this.
When I said that Tictac is the person to vote now, that was because new information may arise. It may turn out that Tictac is town, in which case Tictac was not the right lynch. But currently, unless someone does somethig stupid, I will vote Tictac.
TheFonz also says that I seem unused to being scum. However, I argue that, were I scum,

I would have had 5 others to help me.

If I were the player that is aligned with only himself (I don't know what alignment this is called, so I'm going to refer to it as the one-man), then I would certainly have remained quieter. There was no reason for one-man me to vote someone, as I don't care who is lynched, provided it is not me. I would have simply asked questions and appeared to be thinking about it, whilst I waited for everyone else to lynch themselves.

In post 2359, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 2351, SausasaurusRex wrote:I’m happy with a Black Ranger lynch, but I’ll wait for a claim or something from him before doing anything. Consider this a prod-dodge.

Sausaruas was the other probable Lynch right?

In post 1733, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I'm still town on tictac, so not voting there. I'm down to try this on for a size though

VOTE: SausasaurusRex

In post 1806, Black Ranger wrote:

In post 1739, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I would also lynch Elsa Jay, bob, or NK15 today

These are some hot takes. Clue me in?

In post 2024, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:

In post 1827, Egix96 wrote:

In post 1739, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I would also lynch Elsa Jay, bob, or NK15 today

I agree on NK15, but why for the first two?

Elsa - 841 is a bad post. There were already discussions around Black Ranger and his contributions in his hood, yet she votes Black Ranger for lying about having a list of people in the hood? Why would scum lie about something so easily corroborated/refuted by their hoodmates and what would even be the motive for lying about something like that.

bob - For someone who's written a lot of text, none of the content seems to come from someone reading the game at more than a very shallow level, and I get the general vibe that he's posting for the sake of it. And then there's 397 that's basically a load of waffle and was written only after I asked him about his read on TSE twice. 2002 is like the best content he's put forth to date, but I'm confused why he's only commenting on it now.

In post 2133, Black Ranger wrote:CSF, what was your reason for suspecting NK15?

In post 2352, Black Ranger wrote:I'm actually a great information lynch due to how much of a shit show the hood is. I'll drop some reads.

In post 2371, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:he's aggressively not trying to save himself lol