Mafiascum.net

Goddammit Nacho, you get me every time.

In post 2395, Seanald wrote:

In post 2375, Kublai Khan wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Oversoul

Le't do this.

In post 2376, Syryana wrote:

In post 2375, Kublai Khan wrote:Le't do this.

VOTE: Oversoul

In post 2377, Nachomamma8 wrote:

Vote: Oversoul

In post 2378, Cephrir wrote:K.

Unvote, Vote: Oversoul

....really all in one page right in a row, someone is scum here. I lean nacho/Cephrir most.

This, but its also likely multiball so OS could still be scum.

+ its OS and I'd love to lynch that.

In post 2395, Seanald wrote:

In post 2375, Kublai Khan wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Oversoul

Le't do this.

In post 2376, Syryana wrote:

In post 2375, Kublai Khan wrote:Le't do this.

VOTE: Oversoul

In post 2377, Nachomamma8 wrote:

Vote: Oversoul

In post 2378, Cephrir wrote:K.

Unvote, Vote: Oversoul

....really all in one page right in a row, someone is scum here. I lean nacho/Cephrir most.

This, but its also likely multiball so OS could still be scum.

+ its OS and I'd love to lynch that.

Hi, HAYLEN here. My account is experiencing major chat issues. Because the lobby was blocking my PM, ISO and preview buttons, now SOMEONE opened a private conversation with me which I can't close and it's blocking my submit button. So until this is sorted, I'm stuck with this account.

With this many players, it we aren't going to miss one townie. Unless that one townie is THE GOLDEN TOWNIE and needs to be around sp we can win the game. Setting up a lynch for the hammer tomorrow is ridiculous when we don't know the facts or the night kills yet.

@ slaandar

you tell me one thing that overlysoul has done that even remotely resembles town?

majiffy won't let me vote thor

In post 2393, Bulbazak wrote:If I read correctly, that's L-1. Anybody who quickhammers is tomorrow's lynch. No exception.

I think there's 10 votes right now, so that would be L-3, but waiting for an official VC is best regardless of our counts.

Haylen wrote:What if we hit scum?

It could be multiball or an SK who hammers.

Slandaar wrote:What a ridiculous counter wagon to my Thor wagon.

We can get him tomorrow; I like him as a lynch option too.

In post 2393, Bulbazak wrote:If I read correctly, that's L-1. Anybody who quickhammers is tomorrow's lynch. No exception.

Thread is already 97 pages long. Long game days are bad for the town. AND you're voting for OS so you believe he's scum...but you'd be upset with a hammer? So last chance to say anything.

In post 2406, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 2393, Bulbazak wrote:If I read correctly, that's L-1. Anybody who quickhammers is tomorrow's lynch. No exception.

Thread is already 97 pages long. Long game days are bad for the town. AND you're voting for OS so you believe he's scum...but you'd be upset with a hammer?

I INTEND TO HAMMER

So last chance to say anything.

Too slow.

Haylen's 2403 kinda stinks

Ain't no kinda about it, Nero.

ugh, she replaced Fuzzy. I'm down for killing that.

In post 2405, thezmon221 wrote:

In post 2393, Bulbazak wrote:If I read correctly, that's L-1. Anybody who quickhammers is tomorrow's lynch. No exception.

I think there's 10 votes right now, so that would be L-3, but waiting for an official VC is best regardless of our counts.

You may be right. I was using Desperado's post to Cephrir as a guide, but some of those hadn't voted yet. I thought I was vote #10 at the time. I would advise waiting for that vote count as well, since we've lost track.

In post 2406, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 2393, Bulbazak wrote:If I read correctly, that's L-1. Anybody who quickhammers is tomorrow's lynch. No exception.

Thread is already 97 pages long. Long game days are bad for the town. AND you're voting for OS so you believe he's scum...but you'd be upset with a hammer?

How are long game days bad for the town? They provide a lot of information that we can use later. Hammering without stating intent is scummy, because it doesn't give that player an opportunity to claim or post final reads. Not quickhammering is in the town's best interest. Doing otherwise is in scum's best interest. Therefore, anyone who quickhammers without stating intent or waiting for a response should be seen as scummy and lynched the following day.

In post 2407, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 2406, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 2393, Bulbazak wrote:If I read correctly, that's L-1. Anybody who quickhammers is tomorrow's lynch. No exception.

Thread is already 97 pages long. Long game days are bad for the town. AND you're voting for OS so you believe he's scum...but you'd be upset with a hammer?

I INTEND TO HAMMER

So last chance to say anything.

Too slow.

Vote: Oversoul

Wevshould've given Oversoul time to post something.

Why is #2403 scummy again?

Haylen's town as fuck.

OS needs to claim.

He's hammered, so.

You made me check. He's a L-2.

In post 2411, Bulbazak wrote:How are long game days bad for the town? They provide a lot of information that we can use later.

Hammering without stating intent is scummy, because it doesn't give that player an opportunity to claim or post final reads. Not quickhammering is in the town's best interest.

Doing otherwise is in scum's best interest. Therefore, anyone who quickhammers without stating intent or waiting for a response should be seen as scummy and lynched the following day.

Yup; we need to get both before an actual hammer. And besides, longer game days tend to provide more scumslips as they start to get more reckless when the day goes on. Of course, there is such a thing as too long, though this is not it.

CrashTextDummie wrote:You made me check. He's a L-2.

That's what I got, so maybe we're right. Either way, no more votes until the next VC comes around. No need for an accidental hammer.

In post 2411, Bulbazak wrote:How are long game days bad for the town? They provide a lot of information that we can use later

But with SO MUCH info, weeding out who is scum/town can be very difficult. + the town grows apathetic which greatly helps scum.

In post 2412, Rena wrote:Why is #2403 scummy again?

"Hey guys, its ok id we loose OS, no one is going to miss him."

Mislynching is never a good thing and you seem to be ok with that.

ugh how are we not lynching nacho

nacho you are good at playing scum man

you even had me fooled for a bit

Why did an OS wagon pop up?

In post 2418, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 2411, Bulbazak wrote:How are long game days bad for the town? They provide a lot of information that we can use later

But with SO MUCH info, weeding out who is scum/town can be very difficult. + the town grows apathetic which greatly helps scum.

In post 2412, Rena wrote:Why is #2403 scummy again?

"Hey guys, its ok id we loose OS, no one is going to miss him."

Mislynching is never a good thing and you seem to be ok with that.

okay nero is like confscum now

he is always willing to mislynch

with this post he is actually playing....protown.

NERO IS PROBABLY SCUM GUYS!!!!!

its scum driven but its prob MB so scum can still hunt.

also, THADscum would not surprise me in the least.

In post 2422, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:

In post 2418, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 2411, Bulbazak wrote:How are long game days bad for the town? They provide a lot of information that we can use later

But with SO MUCH info, weeding out who is scum/town can be very difficult. + the town grows apathetic which greatly helps scum.

In post 2412, Rena wrote:Why is #2403 scummy again?

"Hey guys, its ok id we loose OS, no one is going to miss him."

Mislynching is never a good thing and you seem to be ok with that.

he is always willing to mislynch

Since when? I'm always down to policy lynch derp players like you and OS but I've never ever been willingly ok with mislynching a player.