Mafiascum.net

Do you remember what tipped you over in terms of suspecting GM?

In post 2473, Mac wrote:What GM is doing is playing a get out of jail free card to speak. "we have to lynch him now" even though one could easily assume scum went for ffery and missed if she was jailkeeper. She discredits my case by saying there are no good points in it, and even tries to sprinkle seeds of doubt over VE by saying his claim is sketchy (hint: it's not)

You do realize that my feelings on you have little to do with the jailing and more to do with the fact that I don't really see anyone else as a super viable partner with GIF.

In post 2467, Ineffective wrote:i suggest jailing VE

I was planning on it.

In post 2469, fferyllt wrote:This sucks to explain because it's about tone, not specifics.

FINALLY SOMEONE GETS ME ;o;

In post 2475, fferyllt wrote:Do you remember what tipped you over in terms of suspecting GM?

Just piecing together all the pieces of the claim and realising it didn't really make sense. You digging up the QT quote was a biggy, however. Just kinda seems like the way she planned to fakeclaim in that game is the way she claimed in here. then the belief I had in it crumbled.

@gm - ok. so when I flip town will you vote NO ONE else in the entire game because I was the only partner you had down for GIF? of course you won't.

if you are the scum it just looks like you've primed me up for a lynch here. if you targetted fery then you always had me to fall back on since you could claim jailkeeping me because I was your only partner for GIF.

In post 2478, Mac wrote:

In post 2475, fferyllt wrote:Do you remember what tipped you over in terms of suspecting GM?

Just piecing together all the pieces of the claim and realising it didn't really make sense. You digging up the QT quote was a biggy, however. Just kinda seems like the way she planned to fakeclaim in that game is the way she claimed in here. then the belief I had in it crumbled.

@gm - ok. so when I flip town will you vote NO ONE else in the entire game because I was the only partner you had down for GIF? of course you won't.

if you are the scum it just looks like you've primed me up for a lynch here. if you targetted fery then you always had me to fall back on since you could claim jailkeeping me because I was your only partner for GIF.

It looks like most of that piecing together wasn't happening in this thread. You didn't vote her even after my crumb post until after VE put his vote down.

In post 2479, fferyllt wrote:

In post 2478, Mac wrote:

In post 2475, fferyllt wrote:Do you remember what tipped you over in terms of suspecting GM?

Just piecing together all the pieces of the claim and realising it didn't really make sense. You digging up the QT quote was a biggy, however. Just kinda seems like the way she planned to fakeclaim in that game is the way she claimed in here. then the belief I had in it crumbled.

@gm - ok. so when I flip town will you vote NO ONE else in the entire game because I was the only partner you had down for GIF? of course you won't.

if you are the scum it just looks like you've primed me up for a lynch here. if you targetted fery then you always had me to fall back on since you could claim jailkeeping me because I was your only partner for GIF.

It looks like most of that piecing together wasn't happening in this thread. You didn't vote her even after my crumb post until after VE put his vote down.

You brought out the crumb post on a saturday night. I posted on Sunday telling you all how hungover I was and would be catching up later. I came back on Monday and started figuring shit out. Even if it happened in my head I still laid down my trail of thought.

so you were just kinda lost prior to my post?

A little bit. I was thinking maybe Ine playing a gambit. there was always a little doubt about GM though

My sense is that you just weren't in the thread kicking tires and trying to figure things out. I'm going to reread day 3 to see if that's accurate.

Every time Mac posts it makes me more convinced he is Scum.

In post 2483, fferyllt wrote:My sense is that you just weren't in the thread kicking tires and trying to figure things out. I'm going to reread day 3 to see if that's accurate.

what does this even mean?

p-edit cool. of course you would say that.

In post 2392, Mac wrote:Some interesting points being raised about goodmorning.

Reading back, it looks like this could be a bit of a setup to mislynch me. I was her only pairing as GIF's partner, which actually sets it up nicely for me to be lynched next day (today).

The reference from ff from another game is very interesting, as well. I'm starting to lean GMscum now.

This game, man.

This post...here is where you say you are starting to lean scum.

But I get NO SENSE AT ALL from your earlier posts day 3 that you are trying to figure out who scum are. You reacted to being GM's stated JK target, you complained about WiFom, you made exactly one comment about Eff and VE voting each other. That's it. I fail to see any effort to figure out what's going on in the game during that periord.

GM was also not very exploratory during that period of day 3, and waited until she was back from vacation to put a vote down, but at least he had a clear suspect.

because?

damn I hate to see you leave this game.

I cant think straight whenever i log in... Keep thinking about being sanctioned for a two way conversation that had nothing to do with actual game content, having them say its because the rule is strictly enforced in all situations for everyone, and the other player getting off scott free because they like him.

I understand. I just hate to see you replace out of a game you've put so much into.

I'm going to go back and look at VE's reasons for voting GM.

actually typed a mac vote in that post before I hit submit and decided to recheck things for the 80th time.

yeah, no. VE we need to talk.

Sup?

I'm not in trouble am I? I'm having a REEEEALLY bad day.

No, not in trouble. I've been contemplating hammering Mac for hours, though. Missed my chance. :/

I went back and looked at your reasons for voting GM, and it's basically a case I agree with. But I think there's good case for voting Mac, too. Equally good, in fact.

Do you still want to lynch GM?

I'm okay with either frankly. Let me look at the last few pages again with a fresh mind and I'll tell you what I think.