Mafiascum.net

In post 242, ceejayvinoya wrote:roster's vote on BEF is more valid than BEF's vote on roster, seeing that BEF's vote was just a "pressure" vote and roster's vote is him calling out BEF for voting without good reason.

It was a pressure vote and a vote to get things moving along. And it seemed to get things moving along.

I knew that it would make me an easy target and I expected a wagon to form, a sort of scum bait if you will...

That being said I guess I would rather sacrifice myself in the name of progress the game than being tortured trying to be active in a stagnant game.

In post 249, Vedith wrote:So you think Allo is...?

I answered this in 168 and haven't budged.

How about addressing my point? Was this an intentional ploy or did you run out of fingers?

In post 250, BrightEyedFish wrote:

In post 242, ceejayvinoya wrote:roster's vote on BEF is more valid than BEF's vote on roster, seeing that BEF's vote was just a "pressure" vote and roster's vote is him calling out BEF for voting without good reason.

It was a pressure vote and a vote to get things moving along. And it seemed to get things moving along.

I knew that it would make me an easy target and I expected a wagon to form, a sort of scum bait if you will...

That being said I guess I would rather sacrifice myself in the name of progress the game than being tortured trying to be active in a stagnant game.

More than calling out BEF because of a pressure vote, I would call him out for saying it was thanks to his vote that the game got a better pace, like a martyr. I don't believe that's the case, it was Vedith who made that possible.

In post 251, GrandWazoo wrote:

In post 249, Vedith wrote:So you think Allo is...?

I answered this in 168 and haven't budged.

How about addressing my point? Was this an intentional ploy or did you run out of fingers?

Your 'point' was already already answered by me before you even said it.
Given how little has been posted since then I'll just assume you're just trying to look for content?

Was that all from your catch up? Or can I expect more?

In post 250, BrightEyedFish wrote:

In post 242, ceejayvinoya wrote:roster's vote on BEF is more valid than BEF's vote on roster, seeing that BEF's vote was just a "pressure" vote and roster's vote is him calling out BEF for voting without good reason.

It was a pressure vote and a vote to get things moving along. And it seemed to get things moving along.

I knew that it would make me an easy target and I expected a wagon to form, a sort of scum bait if you will...

That being said I guess I would rather sacrifice myself in the name of progress the game than being tortured trying to be active in a stagnant game.

This is probably a town post. Scum probably wouldn't want to sacrifice themselves or pretend to be willing to

In post 255, pinturicchio wrote:VOTE: Eyes without a face

So I'm not allowed to have my own thoughts? I am assuming this is because I stated a TR on BEF. Otherwise I don't even know what's this about.

Eyes is town.

In post 256, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 255, pinturicchio wrote:VOTE: Eyes without a face

So I'm not allowed to have my own thoughts? I am assuming this is because I stated a TR on BEF. Otherwise I don't even know what's this about.

That was strike three, and it's not because the TR itself, obviously.

So, what were the previous 2 strikes, and what exactly triggered you in my post if it wasn't the TR itself?

Right now Scum are most likely all among Allo BEF worm springtrap maad and Grand.
As it stands I don't lynch outside if these 5.

I count 6, not 5.

Oh yeah \o/

In post 261, Vedith wrote:Right now Scum are most likely all among Allo BEF worm springtrap maad and Grand.
As it stands I don't lynch outside if these 5.

I'll only oppose BEF out of this pool. Anyone else I am alright voting.

In post 259, Eyes without a face wrote:So, what were the previous 2 strikes, and what exactly triggered you in my post if it wasn't the TR itself?

Strike one was the whole page for yourself. You don't look like a silly player; even if you explicitly said "I should try doing it", it felt like Mark Zuckerberg trying to act like a human being.

Strike two was the tone of some posts: 158 felt like buddying (and since I don't consider you a goofy kind of guy, that post doesn't seem like following Vedith's townbloc joke); 191 followed by 216 it's really odd. First, you join a wagon without giving much reasons other than "let's see where this goes". That alone is not enough to be scummy, since joining a wagon is pretty common. But then, when I give my reasoning for unvoting, you call me out for doing it? Seems inconsistent, joining a wagon with not many reasons but calling someone out for leaving the wagon; it's like you wanted a lynch for the sake of it and not because you thought Allo was a good lynch.

And strike three was your previous post. You said "this is probably a town post. Scum probably wouldn't want to sacrifice themselves or pretend to be willing to". The double use of "probably" shows that you're not taking stances, or in other words, fencesitting. Is it or isn't a town post? Would scum do that or not? You're not saying it, you're just saying that the post could be from town, and that seems like trying to apeace BEF who clearly wrote that post to get townread.

So that's it. Any questions?

In post 253, Vedith wrote:Your 'point' was already already answered by me before you even said it.
Given how little has been posted since then I'll just assume you're just trying to look for content?

Was that all from your catch up? Or can I expect more?

So you duped Allo into claiming VT at L-3. \0/

But you also duped everyone else who wasn't paying attention into believing he was actually at L-1, effectively pre-empting an actual lynch. Was this your plan all along and what do you think you accomplished?

I'm trying to sort you - your play perplexes me.

In post 266, pinturicchio wrote:it felt like Mark Zuckerberg trying to act like a human being.

Oof.

How could anyone have thought Allo was actually at L-1? Sometimes I do wonder if people have brains.

In post 267, GrandWazoo wrote:But you also duped everyone else who wasn't paying attention into believing he was actually at L-1, effectively pre-empting an actual lynch. Was this your plan all along and what do you think you accomplished?

The reactions I got from it accomplished enough.
It played a part in who I think is Scum.

266 is actually reasons. Pintu-town.

In post 273, rosterfoster wrote:266 is actually reasons. Pintu-town.

There's no doubt about that. What do you think about the case itself?