Mafiascum.net

In post 2494, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2490, MegAzumarill wrote:ro3?

Rule of Three
Scum tend to include a buddy whenever they are posting a set of three names unprompted

But this game I'm putting all of my scumbuddies whenever I give names?
I mean that only matters if I am scum so I'd suggest against using it until I flip red (never)

Right but there's...

With a stopped kill, we're half way to an extra vote. If ANYTHING happens, we can get extra kills, we shouldn't be no eliminating and handing court back to the scum for a kill.

Never.

In post 2500, MegAzumarill wrote:

In post 2494, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2490, MegAzumarill wrote:ro3?

Rule of Three
Scum tend to include a buddy whenever they are posting a set of three names unprompted

But this game I'm putting all of my scumbuddies whenever I give names?
I mean that only matters if I am scum so I'd suggest against using it until I flip red (never)

The problem is your wanting to push me over Loftwing when you thought Loftwing could be paired with me OR Pooky felt wrong. But I also have a philosophy of “kill the roots before the limbs” when it comes to pursuing unflipped associative SRs where it’s only based on one person’s behavior in the pair
Anyway my phones almost dead so pls make sure a decision is actually agreed upon before hammering no lim

In post 2501, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Right but there's...

With a stopped kill, we're half way to an extra vote. If ANYTHING happens, we can get extra kills, we shouldn't be no eliminating and handing court back to the scum for a kill.

Never.

there's only 1 claimed kill stopping role (duckie)

so if its a true killstopping role, he probly gets shot in the face before he stops another kill

In post 2503, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 2501, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Right but there's...

With a stopped kill, we're half way to an extra vote. If ANYTHING happens, we can get extra kills, we shouldn't be no eliminating and handing court back to the scum for a kill.

Never.

there's only 1 claimed kill stopping role (duckie)

so if its a true killstopping role, he probly gets shot in the face before he stops another kill

If duckie is being shot in the face that confirms Unwnd...

which means one of Kazyan/Gamma is scum

which means we should kill Kazyan today anyway since we'd be doing it tomorrow REGARDLESS.

Tempo, Pooky.

how do we gain tempo if the only kill stopping role gets shot in the face? there's literally no way for us to get back on odds then.

I mean scum could hit a bulletproof or something ig

bit of a reach lol

They wouldve said they could've stopped the kill tho

In post 2434, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:can you explain why you don't buy the claim

Pretty powerful role for a mini.

Useful claim to eat a bullet instead of a mislim.

seems risky, aren't there better options?

In post 2510, MURDERCAT wrote:seems risky, aren't there better options?

Apparently not, if it's working.

its not really working cuz hes basically autoyeet tomm if he's alive

In post 2512, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:its not really working cuz hes basically autoyeet tomm if he's alive

Is he, though?



I've yet to see an investigative cc him.

Would they? Seems like there's not much benefit to cc

why would an investigative CC him

that makes almost 0 sense

1:1 trade benefits town.

it makes no sense to trade an investigative role for a walking dead man

So what you're saying is

Let's say hypothetically

I am an investigate

(hypothetical)

I should counterclaim?

In post 2519, Dwlee99 wrote:So what you're saying is

Let's say hypothetically

I am an investigate

(hypothetical)

I should counterclaim?

That's up to you.

I'd wait a night, personally.

you should definitely not counter claim this if you're an investigative

In post 2521, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you should definitely not counter claim this if you're an investigative

okay thanks for clarifying

In post 2509, House wrote:

In post 2434, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:can you explain why you don't buy the claim

Pretty powerful role for a mini.

Useful claim to eat a bullet instead of a mislim.

I don’t fake a guilty, and definitely not like this. I care about my reputation. It’s hard enough for me to get any damn respect on this site already.

In post 2523, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2509, House wrote:

In post 2434, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:can you explain why you don't buy the claim

Pretty powerful role for a mini.

Useful claim to eat a bullet instead of a mislim.

I don’t fake a guilty, and definitely not like this. I care about my reputation. It’s hard enough for me to get any damn respect on this site already.

Successful gambits are a useful tool for garnering respect.