Page 101 of 147
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:49 pm
by Fun and Games
you are very careful not to do this
you just conveniently make the cleverest excuses to push for people to die that would allow him to live!
I'll be honest I wouldn't suspect you as much if you actually townread Ico rather than trying to sneakily get him to live by murdering people that are not him!
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:51 pm
by VP Baltar
In post 2498, Fun and Games wrote:How do you believe Ico!scum is being pushed by SA!scum but you are happy to vote for Dunnstral or Gamma?
Because after SA and I fought, I felt I was wrong about him. Like, that is VERY clear in context D1. You're cherry picking a midday fight and acting like that was how I still felt at the end of the day. It's simply not true.
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:51 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 2499, VP Baltar wrote: In post 2495, Fun and Games wrote:You literally don't present any reasons to townread Ico but you are very invested in making Datisi re-evaluate on the slot and you are very invested in pushing people who are not Ico.
That's not me being bad faith that's literally what you did.
I never said Ico was town! I said I thought the wagon was not well explained. Those are not the same thing. Ico was very null for me
a chainsaw defense involves killing people who are not the person you are defending - preferably people pushing the person you are defending.
It has nothing to do with townreading the person you are defending
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:52 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 2501, VP Baltar wrote: In post 2498, Fun and Games wrote:How do you believe Ico!scum is being pushed by SA!scum but you are happy to vote for Dunnstral or Gamma?
Because after SA and I fought, I felt I was wrong about him. Like, that is VERY clear in context D1. You're cherry picking a midday fight and acting like that was how I still felt at the end of the day. It's simply not true.
oh so you thought SA was town but you still refused to vote for Ico/Darby?
LOL even worse!
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:52 pm
by VP Baltar
In post 2500, Fun and Games wrote:
you are very careful not to do this
you just conveniently make the cleverest excuses to push for people to die that would allow him to live!
I'll be honest I wouldn't suspect you as much if you actually townread Ico rather than trying to sneakily get him to live by murdering people that are not him!
You literally just said twice I was townreading Ico. Nice backpedal
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:56 pm
by VP Baltar
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:56 pm
by VP Baltar
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:57 pm
by VP Baltar
The question is if you're scum or just being tunnel pooky with this level of intellectual dishonesty.
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:02 pm
by Fun and Games
This is the post you made that Datisi questioned you about:
In post 480, VP Baltar wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: dunn
Legit think there are two scum in (Dunn, Gamma, enchant, Ico)
Game is moving too fast and they can't keep with the pace. Sleeper scum in the actives.
You tried to kill Dunn/Gamma but you never tried to kill Ico
When questioned this is your response:
In post 551, VP Baltar wrote:
Same reason for all of them. Lack of free flowing response to the game. More reactionary than active engagement. Ico is a tougher case because he has been busy and gone it seems
Your response is basically saying to Datisi, I want to kill inactos, I think they're more likely to be scum, oh but I don't want to kill Ico cuz "IRL".
That's not a "Townread" That's a I'm trying to kill inacto LHFs except that one over there read.
Which I expressed as a townread because I don't know the proper terminology for when a scumbag says "I want to kill inactives except for my partner over there"
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:04 pm
by Fun and Games
this literally says you don't present any reasons to townread him...
so it makes no sense for you to avoid voting him and pushing for people who are not him to die....
that's not saying you townread him
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:05 pm
by Fun and Games
the fact that you can't really answer for the way you defended Ico d1 and all you can do is throw up random gibberish semantic nitpicking is pretty hilarious.
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:06 pm
by Fun and Games
Like you said SA!scum was pushing Ico!scum so you wanted to kill SA who nobody really supported you on instead of Ico who there definitely was support on.
After you realized SA is town, you still didn't vote for Ico, you instead wanted to kill Dunnstral? Gamma? like it's just comical how much you bent to defend the dude.
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:08 pm
by Fun and Games
Seriously your entire ISO is you trying to push anywhere but Ico/Darby
Trying to get Datisi to lay off because the slot is getting replaced(lol)
Giving A50 shit for moving his vote from Gamma -> Darby at the last minute(lol)
Chainsawing SA with dozens of posts about how SA!scum is trying to bus Ico!Scum(lol)
Then changing your mind on SA but still not voting Ico!scum.
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:13 pm
by VP Baltar
In post 2509, Fun and Games wrote:
this literally says you don't present any reasons to townread him...
so it makes no sense for you to avoid voting him and pushing for people who are not him to die....
that's not saying you townread him
Yep keep playing semantics.
As I stated earlier, I had ico null and didn't find the "vibe" case compelling.
I also was uncertain about Gamma D1, but I did feel that was going to provide more D2 information when I placed my vote since Darby was posting like a noob. This is all in my iso and easy to find. You're just not looking for context in the slightest.
You can attack me all day for being wrong for not joining the Ico wagon. Fair play. My vote was in the wrong spot when the bell rang. But you're being full of shit and backpedaling when I caught you overstepping in your accusation.
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:17 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1260, VP Baltar wrote:Am I being unreasonable here? I think not. I believe SA is scum, and potentially may be buddies with Ico!scum.
so null
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:18 pm
by Fun and Games
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:20 pm
by VP Baltar
Quoting the same post and acting like you're saying something new, so townie
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:20 pm
by Fun and Games
like you tried to distance off Ico by putting him in your box of 4 people who you think scum are most likely in or w/e but he's the one person in that box you don't want to touch cuz "IRL" reasons but you won't call that a townread or w/e just him magically floating above your POE box LOLOL.
then you tried to hardpush Dunn..
then you tried to chainsaw SA who was pushing Ico with some ridiculous reasoning that involved Ico being scum with SA!?!?!?
then you tried to kill Dunn again..
then you tried to kill Gamma...
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:21 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 2516, VP Baltar wrote:Quoting the same post and acting like you're saying something new, so townie
just refreshing your memory because you seem to forgot where you put Ico on your readlist winkyface
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:22 pm
by VP Baltar
But yeah, keep quoting a post from page 20 and acting like I felt exactly the same on page 83 after Ico had replaced out. Totally a good faith point.
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:23 pm
by VP Baltar
But let's remember pooky was lurking until I voted him. Now suddenly he can't stop talking LOL
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:23 pm
by VP Baltar
For four hours. Glad you're not bored suddenly
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:25 pm
by VP Baltar
Remember when you said I defended darby
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:25 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1134, VP Baltar wrote:I guess if my vote is needed on the Ico wagon to finish it, I'm not opposed, but it feels slightly too popular for ambiguous reasons to me.
Textbook soft-defense of Ico by shading his wagon as "too popular" rofl
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 4:26 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 2520, VP Baltar wrote:But let's remember pooky was lurking until I voted him. Now suddenly he can't stop talking LOL
I already explained this part.