https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
rubbish if he's bailed from the site. was heading down the ineffective being the last scum route too.Why would i bother attacking someone i thought was scum?its a three way--- if i could get you to jump. On Z while simulatiously pushing at him to try to get him to towntell i would confirm my suspicions and be able to vote with an easy concious or wait for one of you to vote each other so i can clear myself and increase my odds--- fmpov as long as im not lynched i have a 5050 so pitting you against each other is to my benifitIn post 2649, Mac wrote:Z let me break this down for you how no killing would work in that situation for scum.In post 2648, Z7-852 wrote:I just don't see no-kill to be viable option to anyone else than false claiming scum. And since I was wrong about there being one only logical solution is that scum tried to kill during night.
Now that I think about it fferyllt seemed to be logical kill during night 4 and I didn't think more of it but what if scum tried to kill fferyllt during night 3 also. That would mean that Mac cannot be scum.
> GM claims jailkeeper; scum would realises this is a likely legit claim
> During the pairing with GIF, she only pairs me with GIF.
> Scum sees this and takes advantage of it. a no kill will ALWAYS throw a cat amongst the pigeons, I can show you a similar example in a game where I was roleblocker, which is similarish, which worked out badly for town if you like. I roleblocked a vanilla town, the vt was lynched next day and I was nk'd. Spanner in the works, it's a free pass. you see what I'm getting at?
I hope this clears up what I'm thinking about with regards to a no kill. like I say it could also be that ffery was attacked & protected but we won't know until post-game.
now tell me, what do you make of Ineffective calling you likely town despite attacking you a little and not attacking me? because if he sees you as 'likely town' then logically I am 'likely scum' - yet his day 5 posting makes very little sense towards this line of thinking because he has barely interacted with me nor questioned me.
ou really believe this then you know i am town. I had no motivation to kill ffer --- i was in her solid town heap the vast majority of my time in the game with only one mention of her even being a tad bit paranoid of me and several afirmations that she was sure i was town... Why then would i target her instead on one of the PRS? absolutely no reason to because when it boiled doqn to a 3 way i would have instavoted whoever was left outside of her and she would have followedIn post 2650, Z7-852 wrote:I understand your logic Mac but it just seems little far fetched for me. Scum was against two kill-blocking PR. Losing even one night kill would make game so much harder to them even if they manage to avoid lynch.
aw wow this is incredibly hypocritical considering you have done nothing. and increasing your odds? is that of winning?In post 2661, Ineffective wrote:Why would i bother attacking someone i thought was scum?its a three way--- if i could get you to jump. On Z while simulatiously pushing at him to try to get him to towntell i would confirm my suspicions and be able to vote with an easy concious or wait for one of you to vote each other so i can clear myself and increase my odds--- fmpov as long as im not lynched i have a 5050 so pitting you against each other is to my benifitIn post 2649, Mac wrote:Z let me break this down for you how no killing would work in that situation for scum.In post 2648, Z7-852 wrote:I just don't see no-kill to be viable option to anyone else than false claiming scum. And since I was wrong about there being one only logical solution is that scum tried to kill during night.
Now that I think about it fferyllt seemed to be logical kill during night 4 and I didn't think more of it but what if scum tried to kill fferyllt during night 3 also. That would mean that Mac cannot be scum.
> GM claims jailkeeper; scum would realises this is a likely legit claim
> During the pairing with GIF, she only pairs me with GIF.
> Scum sees this and takes advantage of it. a no kill will ALWAYS throw a cat amongst the pigeons, I can show you a similar example in a game where I was roleblocker, which is similarish, which worked out badly for town if you like. I roleblocked a vanilla town, the vt was lynched next day and I was nk'd. Spanner in the works, it's a free pass. you see what I'm getting at?
I hope this clears up what I'm thinking about with regards to a no kill. like I say it could also be that ffery was attacked & protected but we won't know until post-game.
now tell me, what do you make of Ineffective calling you likely town despite attacking you a little and not attacking me? because if he sees you as 'likely town' then logically I am 'likely scum' - yet his day 5 posting makes very little sense towards this line of thinking because he has barely interacted with me nor questioned me.
That being said--- mac i havnt seen a bigger fencesitter in my life and i am seriously considering voting you
you are a fucking retard--- vote me and enjoy your lossIn post 2664, Z7-852 wrote:Did Ineffective just say his waiting for one of us to vote for each other so he can increase his odds? This must be most terrible scumslip ever. Playing the odd game is wrong move for town to do right now. 50/50 odds are bad and we should really use better reasoning to justify our votes. I agree that Mac have been watching from sidelines but you have been worse.
just in case you managed to ignore the obvious last time i said itIn post 2662, Ineffective wrote:ou really believe this then you know i am town. I had no motivation to kill ffer --- i was in her solid town heap the vast majority of my time in the game with only one mention of her even being a tad bit paranoid of me and several afirmations that she was sure i was town... Why then would i target her instead on one of the PRS? absolutely no reason to because when it boiled doqn to a 3 way i would have instavoted whoever was left outside of her and she would have followedIn post 2650, Z7-852 wrote:I understand your logic Mac but it just seems little far fetched for me. Scum was against two kill-blocking PR. Losing even one night kill would make game so much harder to them even if they manage to avoid lynch.
fucking bullshit.In post 2670, Ineffective wrote:also...IF IT ISNT PAINFULLY OBVIOS BY NOW
I fossed mac all day and mac fencesits and tries to manuever against whoever he thinks is least likely to vote the other person
Once i said you were town, mac started leaning pretty damn heavy against me
Hmmmmmmm
Interesting.....
Wonder why that is
Zzzzzzzzzzz