Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:36 pm
I remember responding to it but I'm on mobile and it'll prob take some time for me to dig it back upIn post 2714, UNOwen wrote:Shelly did I miss your response to my last post?
I remember responding to it but I'm on mobile and it'll prob take some time for me to dig it back upIn post 2714, UNOwen wrote:Shelly did I miss your response to my last post?
LONGEST DEAD THREAD EVERIn post 2713, Noraa wrote:Say pooky pissed me off one too many times. I just stuff him in the luggage and take him with me to dead thread
I'm joking btw -___-
Why you panicking so much?In post 2724, shellyc wrote:In post 2722, UNOwen wrote:Will switch to Toogeloo if this doesn't look like a viable wagon when I log in tomorrow morning. But if we are deadline eliminating, I'd prefer to deal with the borderline trolling player who may well be scum than the probtown demob-happy self-voting panda (who I pretty much entirely sympathise with).whoever that is trying to start wagons is being anti town
we have no time
we have no time at all
You could always read, buddy.
no matter your alignment i am genuinely frustrated by how you spectacularly manage to look so scummyIn post 2728, Noraa wrote:Why you panicking so much?In post 2724, shellyc wrote:In post 2722, UNOwen wrote:Will switch to Toogeloo if this doesn't look like a viable wagon when I log in tomorrow morning. But if we are deadline eliminating, I'd prefer to deal with the borderline trolling player who may well be scum than the probtown demob-happy self-voting panda (who I pretty much entirely sympathise with).whoever that is trying to start wagons is being anti town
we have no time
we have no time at all
Also, Noraa, this isn't AI. Scum does this to look town, town does this because this wagon is slow, there's a half dozen vanity wagons, and there's usually-good arguments for wagoning elsewhere that can demolish this wagon at a crucial moment and prevent town from starting off with control of the scroll's trajectory. In short, this is a ridiculous question to ask.In post 2728, Noraa wrote:Why you panicking so much?In post 2724, shellyc wrote:In post 2722, UNOwen wrote:Will switch to Toogeloo if this doesn't look like a viable wagon when I log in tomorrow morning. But if we are deadline eliminating, I'd prefer to deal with the borderline trolling player who may well be scum than the probtown demob-happy self-voting panda (who I pretty much entirely sympathise with).whoever that is trying to start wagons is being anti town
we have no time
we have no time at all
I got yelled at for even questioning the panda wagonIn post 2736, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:30h is a lot of time actually
i usually only panick when there's like 5 hours left
are we really going to vote Panda out
Im null on pookyIn post 2738, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I mean, I agree, MURDERCAT, but that question is still not worth asking.
PEDIT: god who is townreading pooky come the fuck on people
Day 2: I feel ignoredIn post 2735, Noraa wrote:I feel like shelly has jumped around far too much this game and I just feel like her mindset is "idk who dies lets just fast forward to day 3 now"
I'm pookys defense attorney but that was a pretty bad post ngl.In post 2738, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:PEDIT: god who is townreading pooky come the fuck on people
Yeah we are still doing the player for whom there is no reason to town read except for the fact they showed up to do a very fakeable "obvtown" suicide and then dipped from the thread to see if it would workIn post 2736, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:are we really going to vote Panda out
One more time for anyone who missed itIn post 2434, MURDERCAT wrote:Pooky/Shelly/Toogeloo/Vaxkiller/Lapsa
This is the scumteam, no questions please
is there any other reason toog is scum? cuz I think the consensus is that dude's town that is willing to take one for the teamIn post 2743, MURDERCAT wrote:Yeah we are still doing the player for whom there is no reason to town read except for the fact they showed up to do a very fakeable "obvtown" suicide and then dipped from the thread to see if it would workIn post 2736, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:are we really going to vote Panda out
There is a very short list of people I would WK in every situation regardless of alignmentIn post 2742, shellyc wrote:Pooky likes to WK their partners