Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2020 3:35 am
do you have reads on anyone else this game?In post 266, Peaches wrote:I dont get it.In post 52, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Peaches, mind weighing in on the drama? It seems we were overshadowed by Aloratom not doing RVS, and I don't like sharing the spotlight.
RVS votes can provide information later on in the game. Town's strongest tool is their vote. I dont get why Aloratom didn't place an RVS vote. I still want @Aloratom to answer.
I would flip the conclusion on 2 but agree on 1 kindaIn post 271, Aloratom wrote:I think it likely mafia doesn't become invested in a game so early so as to: 1) make this post, and 2) not abide by it.In post 105, LuckyLuciano wrote:UNVOTE: Monkey
VOTE: InWho22
Half a prod dodge because it's clear that this day is being driven by tunneling and I don't want to be a part of it. Half because 3 players have been given a free pass to do nothing because this day is being driven by tunneling. Cya guys again in another 24 hours, or day two.
I think that you're talking about my theory-related questions, now that I've seen your spoilered read on me. If that's the case, those questions are, for the most part, attempts at forming a baseline from which to develop reads.In post 274, Aloratom wrote:Can I ask what you mean by "gameplay focused posts?"In post 268, InWho22 wrote:While I do partly agree with LL's recent posts, in that I already found Alora's gameplay focused posts to be consistently unintuitive, I will have to spend some time looking the referenced games through. With 8 days left I think a lynch at this moment would be pointless, but I do think it is worth it to look into the case.
Having said that (and keeping in mind that my mind may change once I've read the evidence), this does feel rather like at the start of the game with LL, in that he is possibly saying that we should just instantly lynch someone for possibly in some way having shown a sign of scum.
(And the last possibility is of course just that LL is bad at reading.)
I agree with your conclusion here. I don't think people automatically Town lean walls though. Maybe in Newbies, I guess.In post 247, HoldenGolden wrote:It's more a reference to my last game where I pinged scum!monkey for posting a wall of mostly wishy washy reads unannounced. Most people sees a wall of text and either go townlean or skim through it. For scum, it's a easy way to pad out a long post to look like you are making content.
That's okay. That cracks me up that you were one of the heads. That's a very bad game to go off of because I gimmicked it by over-playing the naive newbie card hard. The only other scum game I have is Mini Normal 2121. That would probably be a better game to look at. Those are my only two scum games actually. I can't say that I post more as Town -- I don't know that there's a big enough sample.In post 279, Kirari Momobami wrote:Alora sorry to bring up self meta again but would you say you're as polarized as I think you are? I was one of the magus heads in schadd's weird micro and I'm tempted to town you purely off postcount, but I don't want to insult your scumrange or say you can't grow as a scum player
As I went back to find the specific posts you posted this and yeah, it looks like you explained the confusion shortly after too. I just felt that it was important to note in a context of you writing confusingly. I think it is NAI at all.In post 278, Aloratom wrote:I think that you're talking about my theory-related questions, now that I've seen your spoilered read on me. If that's the case, those questions are, for the most part, attempts at forming a baseline from which to develop reads.In post 274, Aloratom wrote:Can I ask what you mean by "gameplay focused posts?"In post 268, InWho22 wrote:While I do partly agree with LL's recent posts, in that I already found Alora's gameplay focused posts to be consistently unintuitive, I will have to spend some time looking the referenced games through. With 8 days left I think a lynch at this moment would be pointless, but I do think it is worth it to look into the case.
Having said that (and keeping in mind that my mind may change once I've read the evidence), this does feel rather like at the start of the game with LL, in that he is possibly saying that we should just instantly lynch someone for possibly in some way having shown a sign of scum.
(And the last possibility is of course just that LL is bad at reading.)
I think you're probably Town. And I like your push on Peaches to encourage activity. Pressure votes are good.In post 230, InWho22 wrote:Also I forgot to change my vote.
VOTE: 3bounty
Based on above-stated beliefs either Alora or 3b deserve it, but 3b is active so let's see you talk.
Also can we get a VC?
And thanks for this. I wasn't aware of this term.In post 280, Kirari Momobami wrote:Polarized meaning you post way more as town than as scum in case that term is less common than I think
As far as Mafia jargon goes.In post 285, Aloratom wrote:And thanks for this. I wasn't aware of this term.In post 280, Kirari Momobami wrote:Polarized meaning you post way more as town than as scum in case that term is less common than I think
Probably enough to give monkey a 1 day pass for this post and then I can decide if he's hard town tomorrowIn post 163, humaneatingmonkey wrote:this guy is town.
Yooh how much offsite experience do you have?In post 91, Yooh wrote:To be fair, I also follow my gut.
Can you answer my post #84, please?
Also, can you tell us the reason why you town read Holden?
Like the alora read but not the who read here. What jumped out as lamist?In post 263, 3bounty wrote:Hmmmm. Nah sorry can't see it. Alo is probably town. You're correct I played 1994 with him, but I subbed in halfway through day 1, and the game had no day 2 so. Not much content there at all, dont expect me to be an Alo expert, I am just as confused as the rest by some of his posts in here.
Rereading some of InWho22's recent posts, starting to get lamist vibes.
I like this post, but I can't find what it's in response to. It doesn't make sense as a response to 232, especially when you quoted 232 in your 234. Can you help?In post 233, 3bounty wrote:All I got for you is that I agree on your holden take. The rest just seems like you are trying to fill the post with words.
You are welcome to expand the main idea of this post.In post 293, Kirari Momobami wrote:Yeah crap this is probably holden+1, best chance peaches
Disappointing, I like town holden
On his iso, check out post 226 to the end of 246.In post 291, Kirari Momobami wrote:Like the alora read but not the who read here. What jumped out as lamist?In post 263, 3bounty wrote:Hmmmm. Nah sorry can't see it. Alo is probably town. You're correct I played 1994 with him, but I subbed in halfway through day 1, and the game had no day 2 so. Not much content there at all, dont expect me to be an Alo expert, I am just as confused as the rest by some of his posts in here.
Rereading some of InWho22's recent posts, starting to get lamist vibes.
226In post 294, Aloratom wrote:I like this post, but I can't find what it's in response to. It doesn't make sense as a response to 232, especially when you quoted 232 in your 234. Can you help?In post 233, 3bounty wrote:All I got for you is that I agree on your holden take. The rest just seems like you are trying to fill the post with words.