Posted: Tue May 12, 2020 5:31 pm
speaking of sin
That came at a time while 1-1-1 was being discussed and at the time I was thinking if that was case then group 3 would be the safest bet.In post 258, Hoctac wrote:Doro!In post 86, dsjstr wrote:I was also thinking of voting for group 3 tbh
Group 1 is too risky and if there is 1 member in group 2 then even without reads it would be a 50/50 we get them the next day.
You mentioned you would rather vote for group 2 over 3 since 2 will only have 1 member at max. But from your perspective, you know you're town, so should group 2 and 3 both have an equal number of potential scum (2)?
clidd, the detectiveIn post 266, Hoctac wrote:a haiku about clidd
Why though? You know you're town, so both group 2 and 3 have 2 people that could be scum. Using that logic, group 2 is better to lynch since you know you're killing yourself (town) in group 3.In post 283, dsjstr wrote:That came at a time while 1-1-1 was being discussed and at the time I was thinking if that was case then group 3 would be the safest bet.In post 258, Hoctac wrote:Doro!In post 86, dsjstr wrote:I was also thinking of voting for group 3 tbh
Group 1 is too risky and if there is 1 member in group 2 then even without reads it would be a 50/50 we get them the next day.
You mentioned you would rather vote for group 2 over 3 since 2 will only have 1 member at max. But from your perspective, you know you're town, so should group 2 and 3 both have an equal number of potential scum (2)?
I also said this a few mins later.In post 97, dsjstr wrote:If they went 1-1-1 which would just be a mistake for the mafia then there would be 2 members alive D2 no matter which group we choose. Since there are only two members in group 2 that leaves two suspects to choose from. The fact that no one elseIn post 87, Hoctac wrote:I don't get it, Doro. If there's 1 member in group 2 and we lynch it, there'll be 2 alive tomorrow.
sees going 1-1-1 as a bad move makes me think the mafia would have gone for it.
nope I'm confused tooIn post 285, Morning Tweet wrote:am i supposed to know what hoctac and ame have been alluding to for 70% of the game and im missing it, or is everyone else also confused
That's beautiful. Change "his tea" to "coffee" and it'd be perfect (clidd's a huge fan).In post 284, Morning Tweet wrote:clidd, the detectiveIn post 266, Hoctac wrote:a haiku about clidd
he takes a sip of his tea
it’s quite delicious
im not sure if the last line is cheating or not
Why not 0-2-1 or 1-2-0?In post 227, dsjstr wrote:I think it is 1-0-2 or 0-1-2!
Lynching group 1 would instantly win scum the game"Scum in 1-1-1 would specifically want groups 1 > 3 > 2 to be lynched in that order."
Why ?
I haven't played with him, but based on what I've seen so far, I think he's lynchbaity than the players in group 3 if that's what you mean. He has proposed that we lynch group 1 and at least two people are townreading him for it"Forget the specific partition for a second, I've noticed that you've basically explained away scum!Albert in every configuration and it doesn't make sense to me. For instance, in the case where the groups are 2-1-0, you say this configuration is too risky for scum in group 2 because group 3 players don't seem "weak verbally." The players in group 3 aren't any stronger/townier than the players in group 2. In fact, I would say the players in group 3 are probably the least known players in the list and have already been attracting a lot of scrutiny."
Do you consider Albert to be a verbally strong player ?
hey I had the same thoughtIn post 219, Ame wrote:Why would he be? Hoctac is clearly not the same thing as Hectic. Are you dyslexic?
Why?In post 240, Hoctac wrote:Doro is town btw
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?t=81962In post 296, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Do you have any completed scumgames dsjstr?