Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:52 am
Datisi, can you explain the Andres case to me in a bullet point or two?
Thoughts on Billy?
Thoughts on Billy?
That is quite clearly not what I was doing (putting words in your mouth). I’m being dismissive of the argument that I have been fencesitting or sitting on the sidelines (made by Iconeum) because it’s a bad one. And since you seem to be siding there, I was asking you to point out how my play can be interpreted this way.In post 272, Datisi wrote:also i never said that, so please don't put words in my mouthIn post 268, Andresvmb wrote:Please point out to me how I’m playing like I’m sitting on the sidelines waiting for people to chew each other out.
i literally quoted where you did that. it's the post you are completely missrepping me aboutIn post 268, Andresvmb wrote:I have not been fencesitting. Please point out to me how I’m playing like I’m sitting on the sidelines waiting for people to chew each other out.In post 265, Datisi wrote:if skepticism about you being non-committal is fair, is skepticism about you being fence-sitty also fair?In post 258, Andresvmb wrote:Also, your skepticism about me being non-committal is fair.
[snip]
If I was saying that VPB was definitive Town or Scum, then you should be more worried about my alignment.
also very disagree with the second point, but dunno how AI that is
i'm not omgusing you at allIn post 274, VP Baltar wrote:I did not admit to anything regarding Icon's "bad logic" argument because it is flat wrong. Icon failed to read properly and the OMGUSed me is what took place.
Assume for a moment that I have you wrong (I don’t think so, but bear with me). And that you are not convinced I’m Scum. How is this supposed to be helpful again? You are free to tunnel me all you want. I’m interpreting your reaction and arguments as mostly coming from a Scum mindset. But maybe it’s just how you communicate.In post 277, Iconeum wrote:
you quote me right now where i'm calling you definite scum or i'm tunneling you for the rest of this game
- found his opening weirdly non-committal / busywork-yIn post 275, VP Baltar wrote:Datisi, can you explain the Andres case to me in a bullet point or two?
Thoughts on Billy?
i don't think anyone said "sitting on sidelines waiting for people to chew each other out", which felt like you were trying to exaggerate the actual accusationsIn post 276, Andresvmb wrote:That is quite clearly not what I was doing (putting words in your mouth). I’m being dismissive of the argument that I have been fencesitting or sitting on the sidelines (made by Iconeum) because it’s a bad one. And since you seem to be siding there, I was asking you to point out how my play can be interpreted this way.In post 272, Datisi wrote:also i never said that, so please don't put words in my mouthIn post 268, Andresvmb wrote:Please point out to me how I’m playing like I’m sitting on the sidelines waiting for people to chew each other out.
voting someone purely because they voted you?In post 283, Andresvmb wrote:Also, can somebody other than Iconeum come up with a definition of OMGUS’ing that most of us can agree on?
this is the definition of omgusIn post 285, Datisi wrote:voting someone purely because they voted you?In post 283, Andresvmb wrote:Also, can somebody other than Iconeum come up with a definition of OMGUS’ing that most of us can agree on?
i am pushing that VP dude because of the unholy conclusion it made that i am scum based on faulty logic that itself brought forward, i pointed this in a bigger post out alreadyIn post 283, Andresvmb wrote:Also, can somebody other than Iconeum come up with a definition of OMGUS’ing that most of us can agree on?
When a player immediately votes back someone who is voting their slot, it very often gets looked at as OMGUS’ing because it is hard to see such a move as genuine. If I had to boil down my skepticism of your slot into one argument, it would be that.In post 287, Iconeum wrote:this is the definition of omgusIn post 285, Datisi wrote:voting someone purely because they voted you?In post 283, Andresvmb wrote:Also, can somebody other than Iconeum come up with a definition of OMGUS’ing that most of us can agree on?
it's clearly not what i'm doing
and i'm extremely sick and tired of these misreps
*waves*In post 292, VP Baltar wrote:Perhaps people who have played with Icon before can weigh in and say if this is typical behavior.
Can you point me to a game where Ico has had this reaction? I was reading Smuggler’s Port (in which Ico was Town and survived until Endgame) and the way in which they approached the game and responded to some limited pressure seems very different to me.In post 293, Datisi wrote:*waves*In post 292, VP Baltar wrote:Perhaps people who have played with Icon before can weigh in and say if this is typical behavior.
ico can get very annoyed at scumreads he considers unfair, it's not scum!indicative
your thoughts on andres?
I did not read the setup in detail - I was more looking for combativeness after a SR read. What I’m seeing in that game is a much more relaxed attitude in general, probing players who still don’t read Ico as Town with some light-hearted jabs.In post 295, Datisi wrote:i mean, it is very different because very shortly after receiving said pressure, ico claimed Port Authority, which made him confirmed town, so... (also how do you miss that when the entire game was revolving around it?)
i can probably dig around our games later on, i'll get back to you.