nauci - tr. Used to have this as sr since I couldn’t tell why exactly she was scumreading me . Later reconsidered in 1875 for nauci to be tr. Not sure what to make of constant vote swings .
AN looked like they’re trying to understand people’s thought processes like in 788, and their AtE while excessive, sounds genuine. Want to see her reply to my question .
What I think about the koki slot is that he's not town . But his claim makes me extremely hesitant, so I'm not touching that .
Shos & tw have been giving me a bad feeling. Can’t put a finger on what exactly for the latter. Shos's townread of skitter is telling - see below for elaboration.
xtox is coasting and provided minimal content after he voted me. Doesn’t even sort after voting Performer. Half of this phase is over already .
mitil - Yesterday his casing looked genuine but today's additional accusations just looks like throwing whatever to hope it sticks, like nailing jello on a wall. Reevaluating his no ninja information part, that makes sense if he’s scum – maybe an informed scum?
mew has been playing very oddly, and has been hard to sort.
Skitter has also been hard to sort and even had no thoughts on Keys after 100+ pages, which is just unreal if town.
Vars - his ISO for d1 consisted of super sheeping of shos, today he questioned her being infalliable. That just looks like a way to deny accountability for lynches and explain why he votes .
Saying that someone didn't mislynch before - that's just absurd.
Can you do me a favour and ISO Kokichi in CoH and tell me if that affects your read on him.
In post 2726, Nauci wrote:Skitter, shoshin, tw, mitillos: let's talk about Keyser
Also, AN: how much experience do you guys have with Keyser?
Me, none but I just ISO’d him and he was heavily scumreading both Irrelephant11 and Creature fwiw.
FTR: I came round as probtown on Relly the second half of D1...
RE: Creature: I didn’t like all the strong town reads of Creature, but in no way was I actively “heavily scumreading him”.
This is what I was trying to point out with 2737; I thought it was odd that Nancy didn't use the most up to date reads, and even doubled down on using earlier posts after I mentioned it
But I'm not sure what to make of it, alignment wise
You consider that “doubling down”? Really? I’ll definitely give you props for your interesting creative interpretations of my posting.
What I call it, was not allowing you to get away with misrepping me - intentionally or unintentionally.
In post 2827, AlmostNancy wrote:@Nauci, you were the person, I referenced in my post as being mean. This is beginning to border on abusive now. I’m asking you nicely to stop and if you continue to either talk to me/or about me this way, I WILL report you. Don’t test me.
I think that many of your posts have had a combative feel or are just emotionally charged and have negative comments about people even if it's out of frustration. I always think it's rude be in principle to suggest to someone else that they replace out, but especially when that determination is solely based on them saying they might not have the bandwidth to read
just your slot
during early day phases. I think it's factual that you have suspected multiple people because you think it's so absurd to not town read you, which apparently several people disagree with because several people are struggling to read your slot.
It's a personal failing of mine that I'm remembering those more than other content and it's clouding my ability to remember your various reads and narratives from your slot, but I'm not sure what I've said about your slot that could be construed as abusive.
I’m not currently interested in revisiting it but sorry, I think you are trying once again to convince me I should retract my warning but this post is the exact opposite of persusive. I will not be pushed out of any game by anyone who treats anyone the way you have me in this game, so far. That type of behaviour is just an absurd rationalization, for expecting me to continue to tolerate your bullying of me. Hell would literally have to freeze over before that happens.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:03 am
by AlmostNancy
In post 2871, Varsoon wrote:Oh
I figured out the problem
I am overgamed.
Nah yeah Xtoxm you're good here, I'm a doofus.
I can definitely relate to the overgamed thing.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:06 am
by AlmostNancy
In post 2872, Shoshin wrote:No idea what Varsoon talking about re: flavor or multiball. Doesn't feel like something that come from town, more like scum trying to shake things up. Also don't like that he's saying I'm not around, trying to plant seeds of paranoia about me.
I can’t speak for the rest of it but since our slot is an informed townie with a flavour claim, it does make sense.
In post 0, Krazy wrote:There will be a mafia faction, they will have daytalk.
There may be at least one third party role
this sounds better
Does 1 3P make it multiball? Or maybe I’m confusing multiball with normal?
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:13 am
by AlmostNancy
In post 2879, Varsoon wrote:Here's the thing
I know, for a fact, that Zerg is going to exist as a faction. This is a ducking STARCRAFT game.
And Zerg, in no way, have 'shoot' flavor in this game.
And we know kill flavor is important
because of the Terran flips
Actually,
@MOD: The dead PGO and Vigilante say they have 'bullet' flavor. What would their kills have looked like if they happened? What would be written?
I think if you knew what my flavour claim was, you might be the only person in the game, who might be able to possibly correctly alignment read it.
In post 2881, the worst wrote:Role PMs have multiball/generic wording and the opening post says there is ~a~ mafia faction with daytalk so I feel like we're dealing with maybe mafia + SK
but irrelephant, as w Creature, was shot, so if the Zerg is a faction either they don't have a nightkill or they didn't kill last night...?
I'm saying it's probably something like
Evil Terrans
kill on Odd Nights with Bullets.
Zerg kill on Even Nights with Claws.
SK could be Protoss?
I'm not saying we're missing a kill, but that I think the different factions have a rotating kill with different flavor.
I also think that if there is an SK, they probably are bulletproof and shot our PGO.
So, you don’t think there could possibly be an odd night scumdoc in the setup?
“Evil Terrans”? I thought Terrans are supposed to be the good guys? *confused*
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:28 am
by AlmostNancy
In post 2892, Varsoon wrote:Protoss shoot lasers and use beam swords and lightning. They're... not really bullet-types.
Zerg? They can infect humans and control them, so it's possible that some Zerg have bullet-type flavor.
There are also just straight up Terran that are bad guys and they'd definitely have bullet-type flavor.
I still don’t understand. How are Terrans bad guys? *confuzzlement growning*
I don't understand how crumbing scv flavor could possibly allude to being a tpr
But I could see it being a scum train of thought
Also I don't think anyone here has played it enough to immediately recognise the butter my biscuit allusion, and I say that as someone who has every achievement and used to commentate sc2 esports
I don't understand how crumbing scv flavor could possibly allude to being a tpr
But I could see it being a scum train of thought
Also I don't think anyone here has played it enough to immediately recognise the butter my biscuit allusion, and I say that as someone who has every achievement and used to commentate sc2 esports
I don't get the reference.
But I haven't played any of Starcraft 2.
Actually
Should I play it for the plot/story missions??
VOTE: Performer
I'm cool with this.
Why is his claim more likely to come from scum than town? You would be able to explain that better than anyone else here, I hope?
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:39 am
by AlmostNancy
In post 2901, the worst wrote:@Nauci I don't think crumbs are meant to be immediately recognisable :I otherwise I generally agree. Ironically I really don't think Performer is likely the one who killed Relly but I still don't think he's town
If you think he’s scum, then why don’t you think he killed him?
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:40 am
by AlmostNancy
In post 2903, the worst wrote:I'm not really sure? But either way if he shot Relly last night using his 1sbp for protection I'd be pretty shocked if he was so comfortable with claiming 1sbp today when there's no other explanation for Relly's death
Was thinking over and over about the "no ninja" speculation from mitil. Starting to wonder if he is ascetic. Then, that makes sense since I am a town bp , so that creates wifom from the mod.
So, if there exists an ascetic - or even some sort of a scum bp along with town bp, that makes sense .
Mitil mentioned no ninja, and if he was ascetic scum or ascetic sk - that would be something plausible. Then I could see the claim of no ninja being possible.
There's likely a scum bp or scum ascetic somewhere, who killed irrel on n1.
want to hear his reply when he returns, because I have way too many scumreads.
Ninja is way more powerful than ascetic though?
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:45 am
by AlmostNancy
In post 2909, Performer wrote:In terms of mitil - my theory is that he mentioned no ninja to get town credit d1. During n2, 2 kills happened, with one on the pgo of all people.
Add into that my role of town bp, I figured there could be a scum/sk bp OR scum ascetic/ sk ascetic. Otherwise why would irrel flip green with creat who flipped green with an even-night ability? Makes no sense. That means the scum/sk survived and killed irrel.
Because bp OR ascetic wouldn't need to worry about pgo. Why on earth they chose irrel of all people, that is downright confusing . Because if I weren't town here - and a50 would attest to this - I would choose a50 or tw based on who I knew. Like they'd be dead on n1 , guaranteed in the world of sk/scum perf. No offense to irrel
You’re saying that if you were scum, us or tw would be dead. Why?