Mafiascum.net

In post 2921, Aristeia wrote:

In post 2916, MathBlade wrote:Checker checking a VT isn’t an inno. Checker could be blocked hit an ascetic. (Redirected non normal only)

Here Gamma gets a result of VT. That act of the result + Vt = inno unless mod puts in a goon.

Mod puts in a gun then guilty to gunsmith.

Town also threw by yeeting the Checker.

So again town threw..scum won because town threw proving my point

I don't understand your first line, the only thing that could block the Checker in that setup was the Loyal JK...

The Neapo is objectively stronger than either Informed gunsmith who can only find 1 scum and a gated rolecop that we have.

on top of that the scum team is uninformed who their traitor is and the town has an extra Innocent Child (Delayed) to boot.

My point was that such a setup

has

passed review in the past by Mastina and she rejected the contention that it was unbalanced or townsided in the post game so there would be no reason that she would not create a setup that is similar in terms of power balance.

In post 2924, Aristeia wrote:my point isn't to litigate if the town played badly in that game or what they should or should not do with their checker.

My point is that this setup is even more townsided than the current claimed setup and reviewed by Mastina and she rejected the claims that it was townsided in the post game so it's well within what could have been passed into existence.

In post 2931, Aristeia wrote:and she still doubled down and said it was fine.

so why do you think she will change in the future or that she changed for making the setup for this game?

mini normals are notoriously protown in the current meta.

In post 2929, MathBlade wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=87222

I mean look here.

Mastina got told her setup was unwinnable for scum by many others and I am over do for a more detailed math breakdown on this game but literally many people have told her certain things are unwinnable.

So *shrug*

In post 2930, Titus wrote:@Math, It's winnable for scum because we have to flip Chaos tmo if he survives tonight and we miseliminate today and there's an NK tonight.

Scum don't shoot Gamma here as that's my obvious camp (no night action tonight and mostly clear). I likely die tonight.

In post 2934, Titus wrote:VOTE: Not_Mafia

I think we do this here and hope this is what's going on rather than Chaos and Koba.

Everyone else here I am getting massive townpings on.

In post 2937, DkKoba wrote:

In post 2934, Titus wrote:VOTE: Not_Mafia

I think we do this here and hope this is what's going on rather than Chaos and Koba.

Everyone else here I am getting massive townpings on.

after this game u need to seriously update how you read me - i will cite every single game u misread me in and bury anything u try against me in the future, even if I am scum (although I expect you townread me still if i rand scum and you change nothing)

In post 2936, Aristeia wrote:VOTE: not_Mafia


yay

In post 2940, Titus wrote:I actually debated using this gif at daystart.

In post 2932, MathBlade wrote:

In post 2931, Aristeia wrote:and she still doubled down and said it was fine.

so why do you think she will change in the future or that she changed for making the setup for this game?

mini normals are notoriously protown in the current meta.

Notoriously protown should not be autowin for signing up.

I am pissed off here because I could literally claim scum and win.

That’s messed up.

I could be 100% antiwincon intentionally,

I can’t believe Mastina would do that again just after being told so.

I can’t.

In post 2944, Aristeia wrote:also I highly doubt Mastina listens to you given her wallposts in the Garfield game saying you're wrong

In post 2948, Aristeia wrote:the scum can simply kill the investigators. There is always a path to victory.