Mafiascum.net

In post 2923, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 2874, Dwlee99 wrote:How did you get a result but cheeky and Shrek didn't

Because I was roleblocked! Shrek is scum! You people...

You were not RB'd. Someone is lying and I think it's DGB.

I will pretty much only support a Shrek or MegA lim rn
unless we somehow decide we don't want to sort the nightplay rn, in which case my first choice would be A50

In post 2924, LicketyQuickety wrote:Because I can see a world where Scum twist it to their liking D4 and push a false narrative. That's why we let the NK's sort it out.

Does it look like that's what I'm doing?

In post 2918, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2896, DrippingGoofball wrote:Can you imagine being a tracker and not mentioning your Night 1 result?

FYI this is a solid point

Yeah, this kinda proves Shrek fake claimed.

In post 2879, MegAzumarill wrote:-_(*-*)_-

I did though. Which makes me think its something funky.
Important note is DGB was NOT the intended NK since STD didn't visit.

....oh, wtf.

In post 2924, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2922, Roden wrote:

In post 2910, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2908, Roden wrote:

In post 2900, LicketyQuickety wrote:So... who's up for a Gamma Elim?

Why would we do Gamma first instead of Shrek???

Because I gut believe Shrek. I'd like to see what Shrek has to say about their N1, but given Mega's result, I think that more or less clears Shrek unless Shrek is rolestopper.

But how does Gamma fit into the equation here? I do have them in my scum pool, but they're not involved with the hood situation at all. Gamma's flip doesn't prove who's lying and who's telling the truth, while Shrek's flip would.

Because I can see a world where Scum twist it to their liking D4 and push a false narrative. That's why we let the NK's sort it out.

Gamma elim doesn't prove or disprove anything though, while a Shrek elim does. If you think NKs resolve anything, all scum has to do is kill anyone not directly involved. Dwlee might actually die tonight because scum would've blocked me instead if Dwlee was scum and they were afraid I was telling the truth about my last minute Vig claim, but the RB clearly went elsewhere, so Dwlee is basically conftown.

In post 2899, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 2698, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why the hell would scum roleblock a mason?

Cheeky claimed mason and an unspecified role that failed on me and showed me to be "disloyal" but also "ascetic" and also doesn't have a NIGHT 1 RESULT.

I have a result from N1, I haven't fully claimed yet.

In post 2930, Roden wrote:

In post 2924, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2922, Roden wrote:

In post 2910, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2908, Roden wrote:

In post 2900, LicketyQuickety wrote:So... who's up for a Gamma Elim?

Why would we do Gamma first instead of Shrek???

Because I gut believe Shrek. I'd like to see what Shrek has to say about their N1, but given Mega's result, I think that more or less clears Shrek unless Shrek is rolestopper.

But how does Gamma fit into the equation here? I do have them in my scum pool, but they're not involved with the hood situation at all. Gamma's flip doesn't prove who's lying and who's telling the truth, while Shrek's flip would.

Because I can see a world where Scum twist it to their liking D4 and push a false narrative. That's why we let the NK's sort it out.

Gamma elim doesn't prove or disprove anything though, while a Shrek elim does. If you think NKs resolve anything, all scum has to do is kill anyone not directly involved. Dwlee might actually die tonight because scum would've blocked me instead if Dwlee was scum and they were afraid I was telling the truth about my last minute Vig claim, but the RB clearly went elsewhere, so Dwlee is basically conftown.

No one was ever RBing you because your claim was fake.

What's the N1 result?

So if Shrek didn't visit to NK or RB DGB....my result failed...I don't understand. Will have to think when I get more than 4 hours sleep.

In post 2931, CheekyTeeky wrote:I have a result from N1, I haven't fully claimed yet.

okay
do you not think it might make things maybe slightly easier to parse if you claimed it?

In post 2932, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2930, Roden wrote:

In post 2924, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2922, Roden wrote:

In post 2910, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2908, Roden wrote:

In post 2900, LicketyQuickety wrote:So... who's up for a Gamma Elim?

Why would we do Gamma first instead of Shrek???

Because I gut believe Shrek. I'd like to see what Shrek has to say about their N1, but given Mega's result, I think that more or less clears Shrek unless Shrek is rolestopper.

But how does Gamma fit into the equation here? I do have them in my scum pool, but they're not involved with the hood situation at all. Gamma's flip doesn't prove who's lying and who's telling the truth, while Shrek's flip would.

Because I can see a world where Scum twist it to their liking D4 and push a false narrative. That's why we let the NK's sort it out.

Gamma elim doesn't prove or disprove anything though, while a Shrek elim does. If you think NKs resolve anything, all scum has to do is kill anyone not directly involved. Dwlee might actually die tonight because scum would've blocked me instead if Dwlee was scum and they were afraid I was telling the truth about my last minute Vig claim, but the RB clearly went elsewhere, so Dwlee is basically conftown.

No one was ever RBing you because your claim was fake.

Scum doesn't know that, and if Dwlee was scum they wouldn't take that chance. The point is that because someone other than me was RB'd, scum were fine with Dwlee potentially getting shot, which heavily implies that they're town.

I'm not going to fully claim until it's my exile day. So yeah, wagon me.

I don't feel like it would be beneficial rn
but I'm gonna be less trusting the longer it takes given how duplicitous you already seem

In post 2936, Roden wrote:

In post 2932, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2930, Roden wrote:

In post 2924, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2922, Roden wrote:

In post 2910, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2908, Roden wrote:

In post 2900, LicketyQuickety wrote:So... who's up for a Gamma Elim?

Why would we do Gamma first instead of Shrek???

Because I gut believe Shrek. I'd like to see what Shrek has to say about their N1, but given Mega's result, I think that more or less clears Shrek unless Shrek is rolestopper.

But how does Gamma fit into the equation here? I do have them in my scum pool, but they're not involved with the hood situation at all. Gamma's flip doesn't prove who's lying and who's telling the truth, while Shrek's flip would.

Because I can see a world where Scum twist it to their liking D4 and push a false narrative. That's why we let the NK's sort it out.

Gamma elim doesn't prove or disprove anything though, while a Shrek elim does. If you think NKs resolve anything, all scum has to do is kill anyone not directly involved. Dwlee might actually die tonight because scum would've blocked me instead if Dwlee was scum and they were afraid I was telling the truth about my last minute Vig claim, but the RB clearly went elsewhere, so Dwlee is basically conftown.

No one was ever RBing you because your claim was fake.

Scum doesn't know that, and if Dwlee was scum they wouldn't take that chance. The point is that because someone other than me was RB'd, scum were fine with Dwlee potentially getting shot, which heavily implies that they're town.

"Hi, I'm Vig and I am going to shout out my target at EoD just to let Scum know what I am doing."

Yeah, I don't buy that claim and neither should Scum.

In post 2934, CheekyTeeky wrote:...I don't understand.

I feel this in my soul

@Roden - DGBs role doesn't get 'results'. People are either added to the PT or they aren't. There's no confirmation involved

In post 2934, CheekyTeeky wrote:So if Shrek didn't visit to NK or RB DGB....my result failed...I don't understand. Will have to think when I get more than 4 hours sleep.

Mega likely rewriting history, because even less is making sense.

In post 2939, LicketyQuickety wrote:"Hi, I'm Vig and I am going to shout out my target at EoD just to let Scum know what I am doing."

Yeah, I don't buy that claim and neither should Scum.

this literally just happened in a recent game

So DGB has a "guilty" in the sense that the person they targeted wasn't added to the PT. But they wouldn't know the difference between that and being blocked

In post 2943, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2939, LicketyQuickety wrote:"Hi, I'm Vig and I am going to shout out my target at EoD just to let Scum know what I am doing."

Yeah, I don't buy that claim and neither should Scum.

this literally just happened in a recent game

Don't care. It's not something Roden does here with a true claim... ever. You like meta reads? Go look for Roden doing that legitimately as a real claim.

In post 2939, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2936, Roden wrote:

In post 2932, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2930, Roden wrote:

In post 2924, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2922, Roden wrote:

In post 2910, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2908, Roden wrote:

In post 2900, LicketyQuickety wrote:So... who's up for a Gamma Elim?

Why would we do Gamma first instead of Shrek???

Because I gut believe Shrek. I'd like to see what Shrek has to say about their N1, but given Mega's result, I think that more or less clears Shrek unless Shrek is rolestopper.

But how does Gamma fit into the equation here? I do have them in my scum pool, but they're not involved with the hood situation at all. Gamma's flip doesn't prove who's lying and who's telling the truth, while Shrek's flip would.

Because I can see a world where Scum twist it to their liking D4 and push a false narrative. That's why we let the NK's sort it out.

Gamma elim doesn't prove or disprove anything though, while a Shrek elim does. If you think NKs resolve anything, all scum has to do is kill anyone not directly involved. Dwlee might actually die tonight because scum would've blocked me instead if Dwlee was scum and they were afraid I was telling the truth about my last minute Vig claim, but the RB clearly went elsewhere, so Dwlee is basically conftown.

No one was ever RBing you because your claim was fake.

Scum doesn't know that, and if Dwlee was scum they wouldn't take that chance. The point is that because someone other than me was RB'd, scum were fine with Dwlee potentially getting shot, which heavily implies that they're town.

"Hi, I'm Vig and I am going to shout out my target at EoD just to let Scum know what I am doing."

Yeah, I don't buy that claim and neither should Scum.

If I was scum and someone made an emotional charged statement about how they're going to kill me that night, it would at least make me paranoid. I doubt scum leave scum!Dwlee's life in the game up to chance. I'm not sure why you're arguing against this though since you don't seem to be scum reading Dwlee?

In post 2944, Dragon of the West wrote:So DGB has a "guilty" in the sense that the person they targeted wasn't added to the PT. But they wouldn't know the difference between that and being blocked

Yeah, and DGB is still pushing the "Shrek is Scum" narrative that is really lacking an awareness of what has been said.

In post 2946, Roden wrote:If I was scum and someone made an emotional charged statement about how they're going to kill me that night, it would at least make me paranoid. I doubt scum leave scum!Dwlee's life in the game up to chance. I'm not sure why you're arguing against this though since you don't seem to be scum reading Dwlee?

It does literally nothing since DW is Town.

In post 2945, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 2943, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2939, LicketyQuickety wrote:"Hi, I'm Vig and I am going to shout out my target at EoD just to let Scum know what I am doing."

Yeah, I don't buy that claim and neither should Scum.

this literally just happened in a recent game

Don't care. It's not something Roden does here with a true claim... ever. You like meta reads? Go look for Roden doing that legitimately as a real claim.

source? I don't care to search for a needle in a haystack when seem to know what you're talking about