Mafiascum.net

In post 325, Luca Blight wrote:And why hadn’t you mentioned the ‘lack of Town vibes’ until now? Again, it seems convenient timing.

In post 326, insomnia wrote:Also, valuable thing to point out :

> he scum read me for commenting on the whole situation and how it was blown out of proportion
> when I defended myself he said he scum read me for how I retracted my vote
> now he says I initially reacted townie to his vote

Bruh

In post 297, AaronFrost wrote:They way you respond to the vote is what's telling and I think in general you've responded fairly well to it.

In post 330, insomnia wrote:

In post 297, AaronFrost wrote:They way you respond to the vote is what's telling and I think in general you've responded fairly well to it.

In post 333, Luca Blight wrote:It’s convenient indeed how they weren't worth commenting on when I was TR’ing you but suddenly are when I start SR’ing you.

You’ve not exactly had other strong SR’s this game, so it seems strange that you wouldn’t even mention that you felt that way about me.

In post 235, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 133, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 81, insomnia wrote:So what are you scum reading me for again?

Mostly for post 56 which felt a little exaggerated and forced to me. Followed by your immediate retraction about two minutes later. To me it read like 'oh shit I said something that might be perceived as scummy better retract it real quick.'

It's not a strong read tbh but it's a start.

I like this thought-process, I think Frost is Town.

In post 184, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 167, Luca Blight wrote:I disagree with Alch that 57 bleeds Town - I could easily see self-correction coming from scum who worry about leaving themselves open to attack.

That reminds me though that while I agree with Frost's 75, I got a scum ping because he basically just repeated what Insomnia said in his 'correction' post.

Hey Luca

Not gonna lie, I hadn't even seen insomnia's correction until after I posted that but that was my thought when I first read it and I want to see how he responds.

I kind of agree with you on profii. Last game I played with him he felt pretty obviously town. Granted I was scum in that game so I didn't exactly have to read him too much but I could never push him either. Not quite getting the same vibes from him here as he's been mostly under the radar.

In post 335, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 235, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 133, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 81, insomnia wrote:So what are you scum reading me for again?

Mostly for post 56 which felt a little exaggerated and forced to me. Followed by your immediate retraction about two minutes later. To me it read like 'oh shit I said something that might be perceived as scummy better retract it real quick.'

It's not a strong read tbh but it's a start.

I like this thought-process, I think Frost is Town.

Also this was the only reason you gave for why you were townleaning me which isn't really a strong reason. Agreeing with someone's logic doesn't necessarily mean that person is town.

In post 165, Luca Blight wrote:Catching up now.

Slight SR's on Profii and Mr Frost, as of the start of page 4.

In post 175, Luca Blight wrote:I'm usually quite back and forth in my sorting of Frost but I think he's Town atm.

In post 315, Luca Blight wrote:I’m having a change of heart on Frost, based on his reaction to Insomnia’s pressure which comes across as appeasement. I also agree that his Insomnia SR seemed a bit faked in that he doesn’t really do anything with it and just coasts on it for a while until he is pressured into jumping off. And thirdly I agree that it looks as though he had been positioning himself to vote Profii for some time before he did so.

VOTE: Frost

In post 167, Luca Blight wrote:I disagree with Alch that 57 bleeds Town - I could easily see self-correction coming from scum who worry about leaving themselves open to attack.

That reminds me though that while I agree with Frost's 75, I got a scum ping because he basically just repeated what Insomnia said in his 'correction' post.

In post 267, Chara wrote:Egix:
- disagreeing with reasons to scumread someone should be a null read.
- unless you're scumreading the players on profii?

In post 272, Macabre wrote:Other parts of the case brought against the Chimera are not valid! However!

One-eye's reduction of the events that have transpired is suspicious!

Doom!

VOTE: Chara

In post 276, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 247, Egix96 wrote:

In post 217, AaronFrost wrote:One thing I find interesting about this wagon is that no one has really jumped to profii's defense. Most people seem to have him as a scumread and/or are voting him right now. Is anybody townreading him right now? If so why?

I am, and it's for something similar to what you've pointed out here - I think that he's been under too much suspicion for too little reasoning (or, to put it another way, I see people voting him but I don't find the reasoning to be all that compelling). I would be very surprised if he flipped red.

Are you townreading him regardless of the fact that his push has had no resistance? Like what are your thoughts on his posting right now?

In post 312, insomnia wrote:I actually changed my mind on Egix and think he's town. It's hard for me to fathom that he'd actively defend villager profii here against my and chara's votes knowing that at some point in the game, he'd have to explain that defence, especially because it's his first form of contribution and it stands out.

In post 280, AaronFrost wrote:You might need to elaborate bc I'm not sure what you're getting at here

In post 314, insomnia wrote:Lowkey tending to town read Eevee as well. Lurkers are usually under the mindset that they will lie somewhere in the PoE and will be a suspect regardless, so what I'm looking for here is some form of posting that speaks from the mindset of "Look, I might not be here a lot, but when I am I really do stuff", some form of self-awareness.

Eevee seems to be more like a town lurker, mainly because she (/he ?) doesn't care about what she posts when she comes in the thread. It's like, I see a post, I react to it, I pop out, shrug. There's not really an agenda of trying to look like she's doing too much work in order to get town read.

Hope that makes sense.

In post 342, Chara wrote:as for Looker, just an assumption that might be wrong, that's on me

In post 319, Looker wrote:

In post 308, Ame wrote:In 169 you stated that you were caught up but skimmed and would begin isoing. Later in 175 you confirmed a town read on Aaron. (1) Presumably, you went through his iso at this point, yes?

Over two new pages were produced by the time of your next post, 234. Again, 175 indicates that you were caught up with the thread up to 175, or at least with Aaron up to that point. (2) What prodded you in 234/235 to go back and review pre-175? I presume you had not yet caught up with the 2 new pages because in 237 you stated that you were unaware of Alchemist's post on the previous page. (3) Is this presumption correct?

It's just curious to me that you read back through something you had already read back through and formed a solid opinion on, while there was new content available that you had not yet caught up on.

In post 309, Luca Blight wrote:I skim through the thread and then read back in more detail later - that is my usual habit.

In post 310, Luca Blight wrote:For example, the recent stuff about Frost above I haven’t yet given my attention to - I’ll read back though it when I have the time and energy to do so.

In post 315, Luca Blight wrote:I’m having a change of heart on Frost, based on his reaction to Insomnia’s pressure which comes across as appeasement. I also agree that his Insomnia SR seemed a bit faked in that he doesn’t really do anything with it and just coasts on it for a while until he is pressured into jumping off. And thirdly I agree that it looks as though he had been positioning himself to vote Profii for some time before he did so.

VOTE: Frost

@Macabre / AaronFrost / profii / Alchemist21

:

• Do you find this interaction suspicious?
  
• Do you feel that either of these players is town?

UNVOTE: