Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 12:14 am
Still looking into ISOs. As of right now, I am town-reading Redados, but I'm not done with it yet.
Any reasoning behind it? What posts do you see that display a townie mindset?In post 325, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Still looking into ISOs. As of right now, I am town-reading Redados, but I'm not done with it yet.
It is his willingness to admit that he made a mistake.In post 326, shellyc wrote:Any reasoning behind it? What posts do you see that display a townie mindset?In post 325, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Still looking into ISOs. As of right now, I am town-reading Redados, but I'm not done with it yet.
Can't scum admit that they made a mistake? Town would push their suspect and would backtrack if they think their target is town, but won't scum do the same? Explain a little more clearly.In post 327, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:It is his willingness to admit that he made a mistake.In post 326, shellyc wrote:Any reasoning behind it? What posts do you see that display a townie mindset?In post 325, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Still looking into ISOs. As of right now, I am town-reading Redados, but I'm not done with it yet.
To me, this request isn't helpful. If/when people scumread me, I won't jump down their throats to hear all of their points so that I can go through them point by point and PROVE that I'm not scum. That isn't feasible/helpful.In post 316, shellyc wrote:Make your case on me. I will defend myself, because I am a townie. I want to hear your case on me.In post 315, Redados wrote:I would be fine limming rocknil or Frederick A Campbell, but I would rather lim Shelly. I'm not sure I could see myself limming a different player at this point.
That may have been my initial read, but it is developing (or else I am tunneling). You have a couple of anti-town tendencies. For example, you are quite defensive. You say this is not AI. We can go back and forth whether or not it is AI, but it is anti-town. Another example is that you yell at people for scumslipping. That is also not super helpful. Maybe it could be helpful, but not in the way that you go about it. To get back to the meta read, you did this last game and you were scum.In post 316, shellyc wrote:Your case is "Oh shelly is scum because they are playing so similar to last game" which is faulty meta analysis. I can play like scum when I'm town because you've never seen a town game from me.
I wouldn't say that admitting a mistake is AI, but I think that it's pro-town for me to accept that I was wrong about something and admit it.In post 328, shellyc wrote:Can't scum admit that they made a mistake? Town would push their suspect and would backtrack if they think their target is town, but won't scum do the same? Explain a little more clearly.In post 327, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:It is his willingness to admit that he made a mistake.In post 326, shellyc wrote:Any reasoning behind it? What posts do you see that display a townie mindset?In post 325, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Still looking into ISOs. As of right now, I am town-reading Redados, but I'm not done with it yet.
1. I am defensive because I fear being scumread, as me being scumread is aIn post 329, Redados wrote:hat may have been my initial read, but it is developing (or else I am tunneling). You have a couple of anti-town tendencies. For example, you are quite defensive. You say this is not AI. We can go back and forth whether or not it is AI, but it is anti-town. Another example is that you yell at people for scumslipping. That is also not super helpful. Maybe it could be helpful, but not in the way that you go about it. To get back to the meta read, you did this last game and you were scum.
You say that my case on you is that you are playing similar to last game and you were scum. My actual "case" on you (which is less of a case and more of a scumread) is that you are playing in a similar, anti-town way to last game and you were scum last game.
yeah like fred i have a few things i need to say as well. but i will spit some out now.In post 337, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:My primary execution target is shellyc now. Give me several hours to do some things I have to get done and I will elaborate. I promise I will be less than 24 hours.
1. Not wanting to be eliminated is NAI. Being defensive =/= not wanting to be eliminated. Nobody wants to be eliminated. Not everyone is defensive when they get one or two votes.In post 333, shellyc wrote:1. I am defensive because I fear being scumread, as me being scumread is aIn post 329, Redados wrote:hat may have been my initial read, but it is developing (or else I am tunneling). You have a couple of anti-town tendencies. For example, you are quite defensive. You say this is not AI. We can go back and forth whether or not it is AI, but it is anti-town. Another example is that you yell at people for scumslipping. That is also not super helpful. Maybe it could be helpful, but not in the way that you go about it. To get back to the meta read, you did this last game and you were scum.
You say that my case on you is that you are playing similar to last game and you were scum. My actual "case" on you (which is less of a case and more of a scumread) is that you are playing in a similar, anti-town way to last game and you were scum last game.step closer to a miseliminate.Fearing a miseliminate is not anti town.
2. I only said the word "scumslip"oncein this game. It was directed at Mush for not voting their biggest scumread. I misunderstood it - town often do scummy things, and town could act anti town sometimes
I will repeat this one more time. Just because I did these things as scum doesn't mean I can't do these things as town. My tendencies happenas both alignments.But I will reflect on my behaviour if you call it anti-town.
what was it.In post 269, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Frogster didn't ask me, but I have an answer anyway. For reasons of not influencing the answers of the INTENDED targets, I'm sitting on it till they answer.
i just kind of feel like redados is town.In post 183, Redados wrote:Yeah. (ignoring last game) this game Shelly has been pretty active and pushing. I don't necessarily agree with her pushes because she reaallly does not like being scumread. I am still scumreading her.
(using last game) I don't agree with Shelly's constant pushing because she was doing that last game; she kept yelling at MiniMegabyte for "scumslipping" (Mini was town). I think it's not helpful to latch onto small things and use them to justify a scumread. Sometimes you have a feeling you can't justify, but I think it's disingenuous to pull weak justification for your scumread. In retrospect, I may have done that with my initial scumread of Shelly, so I'm revising my scumread from a justified one to a gut one.
(ignoring last game) ItalianoVD has not been super active but he's posted enough. He's given reads and had conversations with people. I don't really have a handle on his alignment yet.
(using last game) something someone else said about how Italiano's playstyle might make him look scummier than he is resonates with me. I spent a lot of last game oscillating back and forth whether Italiano was scum or town and my impression is that he could hide it well enough if he were scum. It makes me scared to townread him or scumread him, although I'm townreading him now. I do feel like he was more active and off-the-cuff last game, but I haven't gone back and really ISOd and compared, which I will do at some point.
yeah that's why i voted them.In post 342, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Second reframe: Shelly is a high information target for elimination, MagikHorse is not. MagikHorse has done far less interacting with the majority of players, more bouncing off of them than pushing anything too hard. Since Frogster’s MagikHorse vote is in part based on scum-interpreted Shelly interactions, I would recommend her over him.
it made me feel joy insideIn post 189, Redados wrote:That was off the cuff so I'm curious to hear your reaction.In post 186, Frogsterking wrote:Hmm..In post 183, Redados wrote:Yeah. (ignoring last game) this game Shelly has been pretty active and pushing. I don't necessarily agree with her pushes because she reaallly does not like being scumread. I am still scumreading her.
(using last game) I don't agree with Shelly's constant pushing because she was doing that last game; she kept yelling at MiniMegabyte for "scumslipping" (Mini was town). I think it's not helpful to latch onto small things and use them to justify a scumread. Sometimes you have a feeling you can't justify, but I think it's disingenuous to pull weak justification for your scumread. In retrospect, I may have done that with my initial scumread of Shelly, so I'm revising my scumread from a justified one to a gut one.
(ignoring last game) ItalianoVD has not been super active but he's posted enough. He's given reads and had conversations with people. I don't really have a handle on his alignment yet.
(using last game) something someone else said about how Italiano's playstyle might make him look scummier than he is resonates with me. I spent a lot of last game oscillating back and forth whether Italiano was scum or town and my impression is that he could hide it well enough if he were scum. It makes me scared to townread him or scumread him, although I'm townreading him now. I do feel like he was more active and off-the-cuff last game, but I haven't gone back and really ISOd and compared, which I will do at some point.
So you concede my second point? One single NAI behaviour = scumread?In post 339, Redados wrote:1. Not wanting to be eliminated is NAI. Being defensive =/= not wanting to be eliminated. Nobody wants to be eliminated. Not everyone is defensive when they get one or two votes.
I'm fond of bussing. I guess I am. So you are saying that I may be scum with Redados / Fredrick / rocknil?In post 340, Frogsterking wrote:The point being really that if it ever comes to a question of whether or not shelly will bus on D1 the answer is that she will.