My current crazy theory is that dram has sex appeal. I'm in eager suspense as to what you're thinking~In post 3319, ActionDan wrote:Waiting on Dram before voting (secret oooo)
Code: Select all
[post]1234[/post]You're so off it's laughable.In post 3312, Messiah Complex wrote: We have conferred and are calling a Muffin/Nacho/Bubba scum team. Put money on it, put your momma on it, take it to the hole and slam that shit home. This game is a fucking wrap. Let's put the women and children to bed and go find some fucking dinner.
See the problem here. Majiffy stepped away for a reason. He probably would have been screaming MUFFIN IS SCUM. But for obvious reasons and to protect theif didn't.In post 3320, zMuffinMan wrote:@kat
have you ever played with any of the heads of lush life? coz they're not shy about screaming for their preferred lynches when they'renotsure of a read(see D1 here, for example, although that was mostly majiffy)- if they had a guilty on me, they wouldn't have let the AD wagon happen
and you keep ignoring the fact that someone has said mollie has had no issue with outing guilties in the past
use your head
Saying that Muffin was attempting to subtly introduce the notion of bubba being a possible investigate is a bit of a misrep; Kagami asked Muffin who he thought Lush investigated if not him, and then he brought forward bubba as a possibility (in fact, what seems to be the greater possibility). There wasn't Muffin subtly weaving the possibility of a bubba investigate into the minds of the town; Muffin was asked a question and he answered it. I don't understand your point about subtlety, though; why does being more subtle make someone scummier? Why is it more manipulative than outright stating something?In post 3259, pieguyn wrote:i think you misinterpreted my point. the last sentence isn't what's really wrong there, although it is part of itIn post 3228, Nachomamma8 wrote:I don't find Muffin's dismissive tone as anything particularly scummy. He pointed out that it's fairly obvious there was no guilty result (yes) and claimed.
the second sentence is the problem. he's trying to subtly introduce the notion of investigating bubba being a viable move. by saying he'd investigate bubba like that, he's indirectly insinuating others would be likely to do the same thing. this is a manipulative tactic as opposde to just stating it directly
compare to this post in marketplace:here he says that PeregrineV's paranoia of him was unfounded, but instead of being direct about it, he slides it in at the end of the paragraph. he's indirectly addressing the point by retelling the story of PV's paranoia of him and insinuating it's not the same thing instead of just saying "it's wrong this is why". this is the same tacticIn post 3694, zMuffinMan wrote:PV's issue with me came from something i said about seanald's advertising choice (austerity measures) and why it might have just been a move by dumb town rather than scum. he was cautious of this because a game we'd just finished, i was deliberately ignoring his points against my scum buddy and trying to make it seem like he didn't really have a case at all. he thought i was doing the same thing here for a scum buddy. that was... literally the entire reason PV was paranoid about me, and after a while he gave it up and simply declared a igmeou iirc. so the "similarity" he noticed isn't even really a similarity because seanald was town, lol.
i'll never forget this post because it gave me really icky vibes and i didn't pursue it. that above post is doing the exact same thing =.=
AA:MFA there was both a godfather and a ninja in the game (incidentally there was a tracker but it was mafia). the SK also had a 1-shot dayvig and could force a surprise LYLO although he said after the game this was unintentionalIn post 3228, Nachomamma8 wrote:I would also use both two shot trackers immediately. Why do you make the statement about GiF loving being misleading as a moderator? What games are you thinking of?
(offsite) Mistakes uPick there was a scum bus driver that was allowed to self target and it ended up fucking everybody over because he didn't tell the cop his target changed
this game bc there were 2 encryptors including one that was town (me)
so GIF is obviously the type of moderator who has no problem with putting misleading stuff like this in his games. I wouldn't put it past him to put a ninja without a tracker
his statement about the pm being delayed is a lie and is intended to appeal to what he thought at the time was my situation (not receiving a PM yet)In post 3228, Nachomamma8 wrote:I don't get your point re: 2975.
nacho i'll be blunt. you know how good of a scum player zmuffin is. did it ever occur to you this is exactly why? he's dissipating the wagon on him by making everyone run around in circles. this is scum tactic 101 and it's what he's doing here. why the fuck are people so adverse to lynching a PR that used all its shots already? for fuck sake. if he's town then we lynched someone who's essentially vanilla and could easily fuck us over if scum. add to that that he's made some really sketchy reactions already and i don't see why this lynch hasn't gone through yet. unless you're scum defending him because you know your team will get fucked if he gets lynched, that'd explain a lot
A: I was an anonymous hydra. You find it alignment indicative that I lied that I was in an anonymous hydra? Why is that?In post 3265, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:So this kind of makes me wonder...
A: Why nacho directly lied about that if he's town.
B: Why nacho didn't break up the mollie-ffery fight if he's town.
No.In post 3285, Messiah Complex wrote:@ Sakura: this was the weirdest deadline Cabd post by far:
Could it really be Cabd/Nacho/Muffin though?In post 2356, Cabd wrote:Uh guys once again i'd like to remind you that the claimed mason just said "no touching gaiden" so uh yeah.
- Des
I missed your theory. What was it again?In post 3286, Sakura Hana wrote:So here's where I'm at atm.
Waynegg/Pie <-- conf town.
Kagame/MC/Muffin/Bubba <-- Town from strongest to weakest read.
Unsure on GCBC and Nacho atm, i'd like more feedback on my theory.
Everyone else is null at most until I read the rest of the game
PEd. Not sure, but for now i wanna lynch Nacho if he's truly scum motivator, that thing can hurt town badly.
Does your motivation target get to act twice immediately?In post 3340, Nachomamma8 wrote:No.In post 3285, Messiah Complex wrote:@ Sakura: this was the weirdest deadline Cabd post by far:
Could it really be Cabd/Nacho/Muffin though?In post 2356, Cabd wrote:Uh guys once again i'd like to remind you that the claimed mason just said "no touching gaiden" so uh yeah.
- Des
And maybe, if there's a townie bone in your body, you will look into Cabd after Muffin flips town.
I doubt you'll get me lynched, though.
I assume so.In post 3344, Messiah Complex wrote:Does your motivation target get to act twice immediately?In post 3340, Nachomamma8 wrote:No.In post 3285, Messiah Complex wrote:@ Sakura: this was the weirdest deadline Cabd post by far:
Could it really be Cabd/Nacho/Muffin though?In post 2356, Cabd wrote:Uh guys once again i'd like to remind you that the claimed mason just said "no touching gaiden" so uh yeah.
- Des
And maybe, if there's a townie bone in your body, you will look into Cabd after Muffin flips town.
I doubt you'll get me lynched, though.
- Des