Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:24 am
oh shit
VOTE: michaelwhateverthefuck
VOTE: michaelwhateverthefuck
Why those three?
In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really think Michel is scummy, I just think his logic sucks dick.
THAT WASN'T REALLY A SOFT STOP ITIn post 352, gerryoat wrote:OH GOD IM SO STUPID I SLIPPED MY ROLE LOLOL. im gonna go eat bye
Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
Of course he knew I'd unvote but if others joined he could of prob towntold enough I wasn't gonna tell him what I was doingIn post 356, JarJarDrinks wrote:Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
So are you doubting the mason claims or???In post 356, JarJarDrinks wrote:Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT 1.03 |
---|
Not going to lie, it is working on me tooIn post 326, Thor665 wrote:Okay, so her AtE *worked* on you? Right?In post 320, kraska77 wrote:i already explained this before...we're just going around in circles at this pointIn post 316, Thor665 wrote:So you agree with me that her AtE actions look bad, even though you think the wagon is terrible?In post 312, kraska77 wrote:elyse called it outIn post 300, Thor665 wrote:I think Elyse was the only one who called that out as an issue, am I recalling that wrong?In post 296, kraska77 wrote:im mostly talking about her unprovoked early claim
Or is "Elyse" the sum total answer for how the AtE is backfiring on Maria?
but i also thought it was really bad and almost reconsidered my read on her. just bc noone else came and said stuff doesnt mean i cant think her ate here wasnt helping her acquit herself
If you think the wagon is terrible, but you kinda buy into the wagon...how does that work?
the unprovoked nature of her claim and the way some of her reactions were kinda ott when the situation didnt warrant that makes me think this isnt scum
Like, if she's scum it worked.
If she's town and had an honest emotional reaction it also "worked" insomuch as you got an accurate read.
That is the opposite of a scum theory AtE backfire though - if she's scum (and this comment is based on that as a concept to rebut your stance), on you and JarJar her ploy "worked" correct?
So where is the "backfire" you're complaining about?
She seems to be two town reactions to one scum reaction. That's a win, maybe not a great one, but it's assuredly not a backfire.
so do u think they're both scum? or...?In post 358, gerryoat wrote:before i got eat, one more thing. I don't buy the mason claims lmao, and you shouldn't either.
y are u voting me when u dont sr maria or michel either then? -___-In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really think Michel is scummy, I just think his logic sucks dick.
????In post 363, kraska77 wrote:y are u voting me when u dont sr maria or michel either then? -___-In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really think Michel is scummy, I just think his logic sucks dick.
bc that's all my iso's about so farIn post 365, Nero Cain wrote:????In post 363, kraska77 wrote:y are u voting me when u dont sr maria or michel either then? -___-In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really think Michel is scummy, I just think his logic sucks dick.
Like I don't understand how my reads on Michel and Maria would affect you. Pls explain.
And there's this...In post 344, Transcend wrote:it's not a fake claim now unvote.
pedit: we don't have recruiting powers.
That's a pretty gutsy move D1 to tie yourself to your partner. Better off bussing imo.In post 359, Blitzkrieg wrote:So are you doubting the mason claims or???In post 356, JarJarDrinks wrote:Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
VOTE: IAIIn post 370, I Am Innocent wrote:That's a pretty gutsy move D1 to tie yourself to your partner. Better off bussing imo.In post 359, Blitzkrieg wrote:So are you doubting the mason claims or???In post 356, JarJarDrinks wrote:Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
If both are alive by Day x tho, then we start lynching them.