Page 15 of 107

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:24 am
by Transcend
oh shit

VOTE: michaelwhateverthefuck

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:25 am
by Nero Cain
I don't really think Michel is scummy, I just think his logic sucks dick.

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:26 am
by gerryoat
OH GOD IM SO STUPID I SLIPPED MY ROLE LOLOL. im gonna go eat bye

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:26 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 347, Nero Cain wrote:lets flip one of these

Shadow_step
karnos
kraska77

vote:Kraka
Why those three?

I still think Maria is scum and that Transcend is covering her her but the awkward defense does make sense if they are masons. Still don't like the deliberate pushing on town. Mason claims are a self resolving problem though.

UNVOTE: MariaM

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:27 am
by Transcend
In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really think Michel is scummy, I just think his logic sucks dick.

fair enough

VOTE: Shadow_step ?

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:28 am
by MariaR
In post 352, gerryoat wrote:OH GOD IM SO STUPID I SLIPPED MY ROLE LOLOL. im gonna go eat bye
THAT WASN'T REALLY A SOFT STOP IT

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:31 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:33 am
by MariaR
In post 356, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.
Of course he knew I'd unvote but if others joined he could of prob towntold enough I wasn't gonna tell him what I was doing

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:33 am
by gerryoat
before i got eat, one more thing. I don't buy the mason claims lmao, and you shouldn't either.

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:33 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 356, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.
So are you doubting the mason claims or???

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:33 am
by chilledtea
OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT 1.03



MariaR (L-3) : MichelSableheart, Thor665, karnos, Elyse.

MichelSableheart (L-6) : MariaR.

Transcend (L-6) : Shadow_step.

Elyse (L-6) : kraska77.

kraska77 (L-6) : Nero Cain.

Shadow_step (L-6) : Transcend.

Not Voting (4) : gerryoat, JarJarDrinks, I Am Innocent, Blitzkrieg.

Day will end in (expired on 2016-09-13 10:30:00)

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:34 am
by I Am Innocent
In post 326, Thor665 wrote:
In post 320, kraska77 wrote:
In post 316, Thor665 wrote:
In post 312, kraska77 wrote:
In post 300, Thor665 wrote:
In post 296, kraska77 wrote:im mostly talking about her unprovoked early claim
I think Elyse was the only one who called that out as an issue, am I recalling that wrong?
Or is "Elyse" the sum total answer for how the AtE is backfiring on Maria?
elyse called it out
but i also thought it was really bad and almost reconsidered my read on her. just bc noone else came and said stuff doesnt mean i cant think her ate here wasnt helping her acquit herself
So you agree with me that her AtE actions look bad, even though you think the wagon is terrible?
If you think the wagon is terrible, but you kinda buy into the wagon...how does that work?
i already explained this before...we're just going around in circles at this point
the unprovoked nature of her claim and the way some of her reactions were kinda ott when the situation didnt warrant that makes me think this isnt scum
Okay, so her AtE *worked* on you? Right?
Like, if she's scum it worked.
If she's town and had an honest emotional reaction it also "worked" insomuch as you got an accurate read.

That is the opposite of a scum theory AtE backfire though - if she's scum (and this comment is based on that as a concept to rebut your stance), on you and JarJar her ploy "worked" correct?

So where is the "backfire" you're complaining about?
She seems to be two town reactions to one scum reaction. That's a win, maybe not a great one, but it's assuredly not a backfire.
Not going to lie, it is working on me too :neutral:

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:34 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 358, gerryoat wrote:before i got eat, one more thing. I don't buy the mason claims lmao, and you shouldn't either.
so do u think they're both scum? or...?

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:35 am
by kraska77
In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really think Michel is scummy, I just think his logic sucks dick.
y are u voting me when u dont sr maria or michel either then? -___-

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:35 am
by MariaR
VOTE: Gerry
Guess who flipped scum!

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:37 am
by Nero Cain
In post 363, kraska77 wrote:
In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really think Michel is scummy, I just think his logic sucks dick.
y are u voting me when u dont sr maria or michel either then? -___-
????

Like I don't understand how my reads on Michel and Maria would affect you. Pls explain.

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:37 am
by MariaR
Gerry's "slip" seems forced but dat's just me,

Also I mean I thought it made sense on why I had the meta tr on him

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:39 am
by kraska77
In post 365, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 363, kraska77 wrote:
In post 351, Nero Cain wrote:I don't really think Michel is scummy, I just think his logic sucks dick.
y are u voting me when u dont sr maria or michel either then? -___-
????

Like I don't understand how my reads on Michel and Maria would affect you. Pls explain.
bc that's all my iso's about so far
if u on the same wavelength then y am i scum exactly?

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:39 am
by I Am Innocent
In post 344, Transcend wrote:it's not a fake claim now unvote.

pedit: we don't have recruiting powers.
And there's this...

vote Elyse

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:42 am
by Nero Cain
you'd be scum for the same reason anyone is scum, you were sent a scum pm. But even then your reads on Michel/Maria don't mean you can't be scum.

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:43 am
by I Am Innocent
In post 359, Blitzkrieg wrote:
In post 356, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.
So are you doubting the mason claims or???
That's a pretty gutsy move D1 to tie yourself to your partner. Better off bussing imo.

If both are alive by Day x tho, then we start lynching them.

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:44 am
by Nero Cain
@IAI why is Elyse scum?

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:45 am
by Transcend
In post 370, I Am Innocent wrote:
In post 359, Blitzkrieg wrote:
In post 356, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 171, MariaR wrote:I was planning on voting Transcend and taking my meta tr back because I think people towntell best under a ton of pressure so if he could towntell it would make it easier for everyone to understand my townread on him like I already have.
Pressure from a mason partner usually works awesomely.
So are you doubting the mason claims or???
That's a pretty gutsy move D1 to tie yourself to your partner. Better off bussing imo.

If both are alive by Day x tho, then we start lynching them.
VOTE: IAI

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:45 am
by I Am Innocent
Her first post pinged me hard.

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:47 am
by I Am Innocent
Her hop on Maria didn't help either.