Mafiascum.net

i think jamelia is probably town

In post 370, Mr Oobsy wrote:

In post 300, Micc wrote:

In post 295, Mr Oobsy wrote:Unless someone gets healed.

Sure if someone gets healed you gain half a day. If two people get healed you gain another half day and end up back where you started.

Interesting, you're right. But what if someone gets healed

tonight

? That would give

Town

an extra day, correct?

By the way, I do appreciate how you proved that counter-intuitive concept to me. It was exactly the sort of response I was hoping for.

In post 316, skitter30 wrote:

In post 295, Mr Oobsy wrote:I will consider today's votes as meaningless. Likewise for the discussion surrounding them.

What's the point if even playing the game then?

I retract that in light of

Dyrenz

'

Friendly Neighbor

claim.

In post 311, Dyrenz wrote:Eh, fuck it.

I'm Town Friendly Neighbor so we're obviously in B
There's a Mafia Rolecop, guaranteed.
Other PR is Tracker or Jailkeeper. Speculating this is hardly inappropriate since they're the only 2 options given my own role.

Jeez, Day 1 PR. Good man! This should be a staple of every match. I've been so lonely as the only claim, and if anyone disagrees with our decision they are just a bunch of monkeys

By the way, if my brevity comes off as rude or disinterested, it was not my intention to snub Micc. I may look grumpy on the outside, but I assure you I am adorable on the inside. Just trying to help you understand what type of player I am.

Um...did you read my PR claim? If you are trusting me, you would know there is no doctor in this game. Nobody's getting healed. Also, claiming VT is not really a claim IMO, just a denial of PR/scum role. Anybody you wanna lynch?

In post 367, Farren wrote: I didn't see an answer to this question.

I also didn't see any of Chemist's posts where he described you as "most sus" or anything similar. I see the RVS vote and post 203, where he puts you in the "not a town read" category.

Could you please answer?

I think I just made an assumption.

In post 376, Dyrenz wrote:Um...did you read my PR claim? If you are trusting me, you would know there is no doctor in this game. Nobody's getting healed. Also, claiming VT is not really a claim IMO, just a denial of PR/scum role. Anybody you wanna lynch?

You didn't notice a single one of the references I made in my previous post? I was trying to communicate a secret message to you.

Thanks for clarifying there is no in this game if your claim is true. I hadn't noticed until now that the existence of a implies no , because there are only and must be a .

I'll figure out who to vote by my next post.

I'm ashamed to say I haven't actually seen the movie

My vote on Chemist isn’t just based on the vote. It is also based on the response he has been giving for voting him, as well as his behaviour in general. I feel like Jamelia is the only one that’s understood this.

Because you're the scumteam?


/s



...?

In post 348, Jamelia wrote:We have multiple targets but I’d like it consolidated so we can all come to some sort of agreement that we like and helps us moving forward the next days or so.

In post 371, Jamelia wrote:I’m also not “pushing” for chemist. In my opinion if we’re voting based on who we all think is the most “scum acting” so far, my vote is for Chemist. I’m not trying to change anyone opinions on it, but no one has convinced me that someone else has been scummier than them.

The only way consolidation is going to happen is if people change their opinions.

@Dyrenz
If we were then we would be doing a very bad job at hiding it.

My homework for the night - reading some completed games of skitter and Chemist. Not going to bother with Micc; strong Town-read there.

People need to start making a case if they want people’s opinion to change Farren. Maybe i don’t give the impression since i do tend to be stubborn, but i am perfectly capable of changing my vote as long as someone has a compelling argument why X is scum or why X is innocent. I’m sure everyone thinks the same.

In post 385, NorwegianboyEE wrote:People need to start making a case if they want people’s opinion to change Farren. Maybe i don’t give the impression since i do tend to be stubborn, but i am perfectly capable of changing my vote as long as someone has a compelling argument why X is scum or why X is innocent. I’m sure everyone thinks the same.

That was the point I was trying to make, yes.

Counter-point: "People" includes all of us, including me.

tiger cub

Lynching

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

Farren

(2): skitter30, Mr Oobsy

Chemist1422

(2): NorwegianboyEE, Jamelia

Leucosticte

(1): Micc

Jamelia

(1): Dyrenz

NorwegianboyEE

(1): Chemist1422

Not Voting

(2): Farren, Leucosticte

Deadline:

(expired on 2019-09-04 23:00:00).

[/area]

conclusion about skitter based on games I read: not going to be productive to continue reading. I'm seeing both town and scum parallels, comparing against three town games and one scum game. More town than scum, but I read more town games than scum games, because duh.

skitter: what if anything has caused your read on Chemist to change since post 131 ?

In post 384, Farren wrote:My homework for the night - reading some completed games of skitter and Chemist. Not going to bother with Micc; strong Town-read there.

I can link off-site meta as well if you like

In post 381, Dyrenz wrote:Because you're the scumteam?


/s



...?

And what would be your read on this? Just because?

In post 389, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 384, Farren wrote:My homework for the night - reading some completed games of skitter and Chemist. Not going to bother with Micc; strong Town-read there.

I can link off-site meta as well if you like

Would the off-site meta be helpful in evaluating you in such a way that the on-site meta wouldn't?

In post 391, Farren wrote:

In post 389, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 384, Farren wrote:My homework for the night - reading some completed games of skitter and Chemist. Not going to bother with Micc; strong Town-read there.

I can link off-site meta as well if you like

Would the off-site meta be helpful in evaluating you in such a way that the on-site meta wouldn't?

Possibly?

iirc my only on-site scum game was forkbomb which is probably not representative of my current scum play

In post 392, Chemist1422 wrote:Possibly?

iirc my only on-site scum game was forkbomb which is probably not representative of my current scum play

You were scum in Mini Theme 2084.

In post 393, Farren wrote:

In post 392, Chemist1422 wrote:Possibly?

iirc my only on-site scum game was forkbomb which is probably not representative of my current scum play

You were scum in Mini Theme 2084.

Oh right ruby yeah

In post 384, Farren wrote:My homework for the night - reading some completed games of skitter and Chemist. Not going to bother with Micc; strong Town-read there.

Where do you stand on Leocosticte right now?

In post 395, Micc wrote:

In post 384, Farren wrote:My homework for the night - reading some completed games of skitter and Chemist. Not going to bother with Micc; strong Town-read there.

Where do you stand on Leocosticte right now?

- Almost 24 hours ago, post 342 - thinking about who to switch the vote to. Since then, has posted. Has not voted. None of the posts look like attempts to form opinions on people. Closest is the response to skitter's question that I re-asked, but that could have been a jumping-off point to re-think things - and wasn't.
- Had that previous vote on Chemist prior to switching to Dyrenz. The Dyrenz case got shot down, so naturally unvotes. But the previous vote - and post 335 indicates that Chemist is most likely still a scumread. So there's at least one pre-existing opinion that could be either strengthened, probed, or re-evaluated.
- post 303 - the Chemist vote itself. Sounds more like a negotiation than a scumcase. I might be overrating that as a scumtell, though - my background involves plurality lynch, where deadline means someone is getting killed.
- Don't see anything in the last few days that looks Town.

Trying not to get annoyed at the policy lynch stuff, as if I start ranting about that it'll derail things too much. We've had enough of that already.

So I'd put him on the scumside of the tracks.

And thought of something else I'd like to test as well.

VOTE: Leucosticte

VOTE: Jamelia

In post 379, Dyrenz wrote:I'm ashamed to say I haven't actually seen the movie

LOL.

Why Jamelia, Mr Oobsy?

Because voted him.