Hello. In this game I'll be showing pictures of cute baby zoo animals.
Such as these red panda twins.
- 1) Farren
2) Jamelia
3) Leucosticte
4) mmiscrazy12
5) Dyrenz
6) Mr Oobsy
7) Micc (SE)
8) Chemist1422 (SE)
9) skitter30 (SE)
(1) Originally, policy vote for being unclear about the reason, but now mostly just (2) "If I'm town, then from my perspective there's a better than random chance that anyone voting for me right off the bat is scum"In post 11, Micc wrote:Yes, it was.Leucosticte wrote:(Was that a username bias vote?)
VOTE: Micc
How about your vote on me? Username bias or something else?
1. ZeroIn post 14, skitter30 wrote:Early scumpings on chemist
I think farren's post was funny (but not ai)
Leu, couple of questions:
1. How much (forum) mafia experience do u have?
2. What do u think of the fact that me and chemist have voted for u as well?
I've played Secret Hitler and Werewolv.es. With the latter, the way it is works is, night is at 8 PM UTC, and whoever has the plurality of votes at that point gets lynched, or if it's a tie vote or the plurality of votes is for "No Lynch" then there's no lynch.In post 16, skitter30 wrote:Any other kind of mafia experience?
Yeah its majority lynches; twighlight is between when someone gets lynched and the mod locks the thread
Are you saying that Micc (2/8 random chance of being scum from your perspective) is more likely to be scum than mmiscrazy12 (also 2/8 random chance of being scum from your perspective)? I'm curious why you think that.In post 13, Leucosticte wrote:"If I'm town, then from my perspective there's a better than random chance that anyone voting for me right off the bat is scum"
I don't know how to quantify the odds, but my theory is, the guy who I know is voting to lynch village is more sus than the guy who, for all I know, could be voting to lynch village or scum.In post 19, Micc wrote:Are you saying that Micc (2/8 random chance of being scum from your perspective) is more likely to be scum than mmiscrazy12 (also 2/8 random chance of being scum from your perspective)? I'm curious why you think that.
In the small Werewolves community I belong to, they would say, "But if we lynch with no intel, we're more likely to lynch a townie than a scum, and we'll be shortening the game, so that we'll have less time to gather intel, and all it'll take is a few mislynches to make us lose!" and "If we randomly start voting for someone, he might feel forced to reveal his role, and if he's a townie with a power role, that means the scum will try to kill him!"In post 18, skitter30 wrote:Yeah, basically.
Today it's five to lynch, whoever gets five votes first is lynched
We have ten days to sort out who we're going to put five votes on, if no one hits 5 votes before deadline there wont be a lynch
I *strongly* recommend we dont let that happen
The one who votes first to lynch the innocent maybe has more initiative and therefore is more dangerous. Any time you want to dismantle some organization, you want to focus on taking out the leader, because after that, it may just fall apart.In post 21, Farren wrote:Leucosticte: why did you specifically vote for Micc over skitter? Your logic applies to both equally.
That's probably because mathematics doesn't actually support your stance. That's ok though. What you done is expressed a "read", aka a guess about someone's alignment made by logically taking into account the things they've done in the game. I think there's some fundamental problems with the logic behind your read, but I understand where you're coming from.In post 20, Leucosticte wrote:I don't know how to quantify the odds, but my theory is...