Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:15 pm
Teacher. He and I should be on the same level btw.In post 373, JacksonVirgo wrote:If I missed anyone, let me know.
Page 16 of 55
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:28 pm
Oh right, Teacher. I town read them. A TvS with you in fact as I stated.
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:29 pm
Fuzanglong replaces Marionette.
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:36 pm
Sort of siding me me and trying to get on my good side when I'm a scummier looking town is a smart move as scum because it would mean that you just NK someone who is super town and then use that rapport in future days for more ML's
Thoughts?
p.s. if JV is maf then I think the tierlist would be a good nit to pick for clues about partner
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 7:23 pm
So you're just assuming I am scum? Okay thenIn post 378, bugspray wrote:Sort of siding me me and trying to get on my good side when I'm a scummier looking town is a smart move as scum because it would mean that you just NK someone who is super town and then use that rapport in future days for more ML's
Thoughts?
p.s. if JV is maf then I think the tierlist would be a good nit to pick for clues about partner
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 7:54 pm
No, I'm saying that you did something very scummy just now
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 8:35 pm
Voting up my biggest scumread is scummy? Sounds legit
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 8:50 pm
Alright let me rephrase it: it's a very good play to make as scum which I guess isn't really super scummy
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:01 pm
I mean I guess so if I were scum, but alas I am not so you're theory breaks there.In post 382, bugspray wrote:Alright let me rephrase it: it's a very good play to make as scum which I guess isn't really super scummy
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:39 pm
I don't think people voting on the same person means they're trying to get on their good side. I wouldn't say myself/Teacher and Datisi/Fish are trying to "get close" or whatever, yet our votes are on the same people. Not sure if that's good logic to work off of.In post 378, bugspray wrote:Sort of siding me me and trying to get on my good side when I'm a scummier looking town is a smart move as scum because it would mean that you just NK someone who is super town and then use that rapport in future days for more ML's
Thoughts?
p.s. if JV is maf then I think the tierlist would be a good nit to pick for clues about partner
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:33 pm
I mean from my pov, it isn't good logic and it seems to be biased against me completely. If they want to base their future reads of that it's fine, just they need to think the same about you/teacher, datisi/fish like you stated or the logic falls through the cracks.In post 384, Uncrowned wrote:I don't think people voting on the same person means they're trying to get on their good side. I wouldn't say myself/Teacher and Datisi/Fish are trying to "get close" or whatever, yet our votes are on the same people. Not sure if that's good logic to work off of.In post 378, bugspray wrote:Sort of siding me me and trying to get on my good side when I'm a scummier looking town is a smart move as scum because it would mean that you just NK someone who is super town and then use that rapport in future days for more ML's
Thoughts?
p.s. if JV is maf then I think the tierlist would be a good nit to pick for clues about partner
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:59 pm
VOTE: formerfish
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:03 am
Reasoning?
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:24 am
This (bottom) post struck me as possibly coached. I agree w GD’s comments that your prior posts seemed more emotional and coming from a quite different perspective than most. I was willing to chalk that up to a newb getting used to forum mafia, but here you are showing different - more standard and more advanced - thinking. Specifically the line on parroting, that’s not ‘feelings’ that’s a specific and potentially accurate criticism. It’s a level different than your other posts in a way that’s concerning.In post 362, bugspray wrote:And you've come along back and just parroted the same concerns that other players had put forward. Now certainly it is a reasonable concern but don't you have anything more to add?In post 361, gardenia wrote:This is just my opinion, but so far you've been saying a lot of things but not much has backing/doesn't really make sense. Most of these are based on "feelings"? :/In post 345, bugspray wrote:Okay some people who I think are scummy:
Fish because a lot of his posts are useless crap like what his midnight snack is. Also when I consider if I should lynch him I get this different emotional response inside me than considering other people. Idk how to describe it but it's like a "noooo don't" feeling. Just feels like a weird way to stand out I think he may have possibly tried to manipulate us into not wanting him to Lynch him for not logical reasons
Gard feels kinda like a mafia trying to hide behind newbie mask of innocence and isn't posting too often so that nobody can catch her making mistakes.
JV shutting up for this long is probably relaxing and he can take a break room defending himself. The lack of posting now that the heat is off is odd to me.
It's possible a newbie maf could post with partner in the private thread and think oh I'm posting that's good and accidentally neglect posting here which makes me think gard and jv are a bit more sus, although jv certainly does make a high magnitude of weird newb errors if that is the case
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:39 am
JV, I don't get this part? How does this equate to a Gard TL?In post 373, JacksonVirgo wrote:Gardenia - They seemed to be reluctant to vote at all at first, which doesn't inherently mean anything but then teacher stated that they wrote that out as scum.
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:47 am
Throwing shade then immediately backpedaling when you realize the argument isn't that good/you get heat. Hmmmm.
Spoiler: 1
Spoiler: 2
Spoiler: 3
We've had people voting together earlier too. When did this thought occur?In post 378, bugspray wrote:Sort of siding me me and trying to get on my good side when I'm a scummier looking town is a smart move as scum because it would mean that you just NK someone who is super town and then use that rapport in future days for more ML's
Is that why you haven't done a tierlist yourself?In post 378, bugspray wrote:p.s. if JV is maf then I think the tierlist would be a good nit to pick for clues about partner
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:48 am
That's what I'm saying, I don't agree with the logic. I think it's too surface level.In post 385, JacksonVirgo wrote:I mean from my pov, it isn't good logic and it seems to be biased against me completely. If they want to base their future reads of that it's fine, just they need to think the same about you/teacher, datisi/fish like you stated or the logic falls through the cracks.In post 384, Uncrowned wrote:I don't think people voting on the same person means they're trying to get on their good side. I wouldn't say myself/Teacher and Datisi/Fish are trying to "get close" or whatever, yet our votes are on the same people. Not sure if that's good logic to work off of.In post 378, bugspray wrote:Sort of siding me me and trying to get on my good side when I'm a scummier looking town is a smart move as scum because it would mean that you just NK someone who is super town and then use that rapport in future days for more ML's
Thoughts?
p.s. if JV is maf then I think the tierlist would be a good nit to pick for clues about partner
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:51 am
Also, Fish is at L-2. Not a fan of that naked vote.
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:55 am
This is what I'm thinking, it seems like an odd thing to point out. What I want more of an explanation of is this part though:We've had people voting together earlier too. When did this thought occur?
Maybe I'm crazy, but isn't this the opposite of what you'd want to do? Not that I think JV voting with you is valid reasoning anyway, Bug, but this seems off.trying to get on my good side when I'm a scummier looking town is a smart move as scum
I could be misunderstanding your point. Explain?
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:00 am
Until Gyro explains that vote I am going to unvote so.
/unvote
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:02 am
I forgot the proper formatting so I'll do it again.
UNVOTE: FF
UNVOTE: FF
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:06 am
To put it simply, I voted because I feel they are a TvS with Teacher. The fact Gyro jumped onto that with a naked vote makes me want to get off that shiz as fast as I can.
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:15 am
Didn't you also say you thought Gyro/Fish was SvS?In post 396, JacksonVirgo wrote:To put it simply, I voted because I feel they are a TvS with Teacher. The fact Gyro jumped onto that with a naked vote makes me want to get off that shiz as fast as I can.
Do you still see Fish as Scum then, or no?
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:25 am
I don't remember writing that anywhere but yes I feel Gyro/Fish are a SvS and this might be a way of Gyro getting towncred but I also think Teacher/Fish is a TvS.In post 397, Uncrowned wrote:Didn't you also say you thought Gyro/Fish was SvS?In post 396, JacksonVirgo wrote:To put it simply, I voted because I feel they are a TvS with Teacher. The fact Gyro jumped onto that with a naked vote makes me want to get off that shiz as fast as I can.
Do you still see Fish as Scum then, or no?
So currently my reads are FF and Gyro being scum. I left that wagon because I don't want it to be lynched yet.
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 1:29 am
I went back and found it, Post 373 is when you said it.In post 398, JacksonVirgo wrote:I don't remember writing that anywhere but yes I feel Gyro/Fish are a SvS and this might be a way of Gyro getting towncred but I also think Teacher/Fish is a TvS.In post 397, Uncrowned wrote:Didn't you also say you thought Gyro/Fish was SvS?In post 396, JacksonVirgo wrote:To put it simply, I voted because I feel they are a TvS with Teacher. The fact Gyro jumped onto that with a naked vote makes me want to get off that shiz as fast as I can.
Do you still see Fish as Scum then, or no?
So currently my reads are FF and Gyro being scum. I left that wagon because I don't want it to be lynched yet.
So you think Fish is scum but don't want to apply pressure onto him yet? I don't like the Gyro vote on him either, but if you think he's scum wouldn't you want pressure on FF?