Mafiascum.net

In post 370, StrangeMatter wrote:I'm here. I just recently ate a lobster in a piece of bread. Apparently it's a thing.

Anyways, I need to catch up with this game.

Hi strange, u town this game?

In post 375, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 370, StrangeMatter wrote:I'm here. I just recently ate a lobster in a piece of bread. Apparently it's a thing.

Anyways, I need to catch up with this game.

Hi strange, u town this game?

Do you really want me to answer this question seriously? Yes, but if you asked almost anyone else here right now, they'd all give the exact same answer as this one.

I'm a bit too tired to post a lot right now, it's pretty late here while catching up. See you all in a couple hours. Ask me anything tomorrow please.

In post 374, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:a lobster roll, right? i haven't had one before

i'll stop artificially inflating my post count now
im going to blame my procrastinating on the wallposters or something. no IRL stuff has been happening
i'll have 3 semi-large posts out about the topics ive been talking about (T3, ISO on hockey, the two cents i have on the discussions grandpamo has been having)
you can expect them to be out while they're still relevant lol

it's better to give concurrent reads for three reasons

pros:

1. it gives the rest of town a better grasp on how you think during the real time interaction

2. scum is more likely to wait out as they have not thought of anything to say.

3. its more easier for you, dont give your self promises, i did this in my first town game and my first scum game, turned out usually in my town games, i never fulfil the promise of giving thoughts out later on but in my first scum, i did every single time because i wanted town to see i was trying etc.

im not tryna tell u how u should play, but in these specific circumstances, you may or may not just have reiterate info that was already said and continue to prolong discussion that doesn't progress town further.

In post 376, StrangeMatter wrote:

In post 375, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 370, StrangeMatter wrote:I'm here. I just recently ate a lobster in a piece of bread. Apparently it's a thing.

Anyways, I need to catch up with this game.

Hi strange, u town this game?

Do you really want me to answer this question seriously? Yes, but if you asked almost anyone else here right now, they'd all give the exact same answer as this one.

I'm a bit too tired to post a lot right now, it's pretty late here while catching up. See you all in a couple hours. Ask me anything tomorrow please.

this is sorta a bad rxn...

In post 377, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 374, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:a lobster roll, right? i haven't had one before

i'll stop artificially inflating my post count now
im going to blame my procrastinating on the wallposters or something. no IRL stuff has been happening
i'll have 3 semi-large posts out about the topics ive been talking about (T3, ISO on hockey, the two cents i have on the discussions grandpamo has been having)
you can expect them to be out while they're still relevant lol

it's better to give concurrent reads for

two

three reasons

pros:

1. it gives the rest of town a better grasp on how you think during the real time interaction

2. scum is more likely to wait out as they have not thought of anything to say.

3. its more easier for you, dont give your self promises, i did this in my first town game and my first scum game, turned out usually in my town games, i never fulfil the promise of giving thoughts out later on but in my first scum, i did every single time because i wanted town to see i was trying etc.

im not tryna tell u how u should play, but in these specific circumstances, you may or may not just have reiterate info that was already said and continue to prolong discussion that doesn't progress town further.

the reads ive given out before ARENT concurrent like at all so the posts are good for me. besides, i see no reason to stop everything i'm doing and make my walls. i will still enjoy whatever there is that's really recent
expand on your second point?
the third part is true for sure. this took like 5 minutes but the promises i made have yet to be fulfilled after 2 days
i think despite the empathetic nature of this post this feels pretty loaded and likely not something i'll fully agree with you on right now given the information I have

In post 376, StrangeMatter wrote:

In post 375, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 370, StrangeMatter wrote:I'm here. I just recently ate a lobster in a piece of bread. Apparently it's a thing.

Anyways, I need to catch up with this game.

Hi strange, u town this game?

Do you really want me to answer this question seriously? Yes, but if you asked almost anyone else here right now, they'd all give the exact same answer as this one.

I'm a bit too tired to post a lot right now, it's pretty late here while catching up. See you all in a couple hours. Ask me anything tomorrow please.

Who said this was a serious question? It was more of a jokey question, dont see why u need this reaction to the question but w/e, i'll wait for your thoughts tmr morning

In post 380, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 376, StrangeMatter wrote:

In post 375, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 370, StrangeMatter wrote:I'm here. I just recently ate a lobster in a piece of bread. Apparently it's a thing.

Anyways, I need to catch up with this game.

Hi strange, u town this game?

Do you really want me to answer this question seriously? Yes, but if you asked almost anyone else here right now, they'd all give the exact same answer as this one.

I'm a bit too tired to post a lot right now, it's pretty late here while catching up. See you all in a couple hours. Ask me anything tomorrow please.

Who said this was a serious question? It was more of a jokey question, dont see why u need this reaction to the question but w/e, i'll wait for your thoughts tmr morning

i was gonna @ u and say if we were thinking the same thing, ig we were lol

In post 379, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:

In post 377, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 374, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:a lobster roll, right? i haven't had one before

i'll stop artificially inflating my post count now
im going to blame my procrastinating on the wallposters or something. no IRL stuff has been happening
i'll have 3 semi-large posts out about the topics ive been talking about (T3, ISO on hockey, the two cents i have on the discussions grandpamo has been having)
you can expect them to be out while they're still relevant lol

it's better to give concurrent reads for

two

three reasons

pros:

1. it gives the rest of town a better grasp on how you think during the real time interaction

2. scum is more likely to wait out as they have not thought of anything to say.

3. its more easier for you, dont give your self promises, i did this in my first town game and my first scum game, turned out usually in my town games, i never fulfil the promise of giving thoughts out later on but in my first scum, i did every single time because i wanted town to see i was trying etc.

im not tryna tell u how u should play, but in these specific circumstances, you may or may not just have reiterate info that was already said and continue to prolong discussion that doesn't progress town further.

the reads ive given out before ARENT concurrent like at all so the posts are good for me. besides, i see no reason to stop everything i'm doing and make my walls. i will still enjoy whatever there is that's really recent
expand on your second point?
the third part is true for sure. this took like 5 minutes but the promises i made have yet to be fulfilled after 2 days
i think despite the empathetic nature of this post this feels pretty loaded and likely not something i'll fully agree with you on right now given the information I have

i dont even want that from you.

i just want to know how you read ppl rn, why do you scumread me? you don't have to give out a whole essay on why

just give a line of reasoning and maybe provide explanations wit examples 2-5 sentences

etc or why rocky is town. which is a question i wanted you to answer

hi woops i let this get away from me a little bit but im gonna catch up either later tonight or tomorrow morning

most of my posts won't be this long. essays suck!

i think it's a given that T3's game regardless of alignment will be filled with one liners and things that they won't expand on unless asked repeatedly. because of this i disagree with scumreading them for that only (i think some people are,), and it'll be for slightly different reasons

tonally, i think their earlygame looks really odd and something that i'd usually see from someone that doesn't know how to generate the information they need to plow through earlygame. they're just floating by and chucking a few names out, including the mod(?) pet peeve is people doing that [shoutout to james too,] since it's openly denying people information about yourself and who you are willing to align with, which means you likely have something to hide

In post 49, T3 wrote:Hello everyone!
Hello random mafia.gg people!
Hello to my scumpartner fferry!

In post 129, T3 wrote:I admit it I'm Jester.
I'm kind of tired rn I'll do stuff tomorrow or llater.

when given the chance to align with people, they churn out stuff like this. it's hard to use stuff like this because it's so ambiguous, which I don't like from anybody

In post 133, T3 wrote:

In post 131, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:unless a new topic comes up i will talk about the claim for 9 more days

wtf
Someone claimed?
Rollin gtown in newbie games burns the soul.

does this count as LAMIST? you just called yourself a jester, dont make it a point to call out that you're town

i think one point for them is the townread on me. it's built on odd reasoning, but it's reasoning that feels like it comes from a personal perspective, possibly from their own experiences when they were a newb that they're applying. i think scum probably doesn't have an incentive to townread me on such shaky grounds, even if it was weak. i asked bulge about the townread and they didn't care about it, then i asked hockey to elaborate on a comment about it and they said they liked it but disagreed? it might be something that you guys don't care about that much but it's probably the first actually AI thing that's come from them

In post 146, T3 wrote:Specifically why I think cows is town is because his thought is too complex for a fresh newb straight from mafia.gg.

In post 211, T3 wrote:This has entered a whole new dimension of misinterpretation.

this was a comment when hockey V grandpamo was happening. understands that it's a misinterpretation but refuses to take any sort of sides. i guess it's pretty funny cause i thought the same thing, so post might be townier than i think

In post 337, T3 wrote: I don't see how refusing to give AI content is a scumtell.

towniest post award (not joking)

a ton of T3's reads are based on meta and they admit this, so i will not comment without the appropriate reading material (wink wink)
i think their unvote on James is towny,

In post 203, T3 wrote:UNVOTE: James
This is a playstyle difference. I put a lot of stock in meta, you don't care about it so you do weird stuff.

the veiled extra information they have on James i don't mind that much but ill pretend that i have it so I can still call James town
tl;dr T3 looks bad earlygame but has lightened up with towny posts

my two cents on strange's response to 375 is that it gives a good glimpse into their personality
they are here and they are tired of your stinky mind games
its NAI

Cows in radiating townieness.

In post 386, T3 wrote:Cows in radiating townieness.

For any other reason than them townreading you?

In post 385, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:my two cents on strange's response to 375 is that it gives a good glimpse into their personality
they are here and they are tired of your stinky mind games
its NAI

Yea and theres nothing wrong with that but I was suprised by their gameplay change at the very start of d1 in this game compared to Newbie 2067 where they were a lot more laid back. Now this gameplay change is mostly NAI, but I think there is some town leaningness to that? Maybe its also their scum playstyle since they were town in Newbie 2067 so idk man

In post 336, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 335, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 329, GrandpaMo wrote:i also do agree its a bad post

but im not responding to it anymore unless u rlly want me to, since everything is just easily either taken out of context / not thought about properly.

i realize if i dont respond then i get ur true thoughts on other ppl, than you just continuing to blindly tunnel me for no reason.

Alright, thats fine. So based on the whole interaction I had with GPA, i think Im confident in switching cows and Gpa in my reads list. I think cows is a bit scum here, because hes refusing to give AI content for the past while. He gave some reads but has shyed away alot from giving an explanation

Wait until you realise how much or little content T3 has provided.

After reading T3's ISO, I do agree with this statement so yea I might like James as town for now

In post 308, VFP wrote:Gut and because I'm ill.

ok, do you have any other gut feelings? (aside from any literal ones you may be experiencing as a result of your illness)

In post 314, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 302, The Bulge wrote:

In post 202, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 176, The Bulge wrote:

In post 173, HockeyFan wrote:Its NAI cuz I dont think scum posts smth like that early into the game. Likewise, theres no reason for any VT to claim their role d1 so its not something town should do, so imo its NAI

...how is this not the same thing as 'tstbs' tho? you're saying you don't think scum would post something anti-town so early, which is the exact same thought process as tstbs.

because its full null, I also think town has 0 reason to do this. This is different than tstbs, because if u think they're "tstsbs" you SR them in some sort already which I didnt do

'tstbs' implies a townread.

Once again, I never said "tstbs"

in this very post I quoted you said "if u think they're "tstsbs" you SR them in some sort already", which is false, because if I think someone is tstbs then I TR them.

That early into the game is shocking especally when T3 hadnt done anything scummy in eyes

? how do you expect Day 1 to look if nobody is collaborating on reads or testing out different potential wagons?

In post 341, VFP wrote:I want to discuss why I should vote there.

You wanted progress on the game so I'm trying to do it.

scummy response

In post 361, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 355, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 354, VFP wrote:If I vote with you will I be town?

what happened to the more aggressive VFP?

why are acting vulnerable and different.

you + james have been acting very passive this game and maybe you could get away with it since you are ill, but even jame's interaction with you is weird.

you never ever sheeped me in your life.

talk to me, why are you playing this way?

It's just a dead game. We have a person waiting to be replaced, a new player seldom posting, waiting on a dude to finish an essay of reads, T3 etc etc.

James/VFP scumteam? i dig it

In post 387, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 386, T3 wrote:Cows in radiating townieness.

For any other reason than them townreading you?

James really hates it when people get townreads and the PoE continues to narrow, huh

In post 389, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 336, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 335, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 329, GrandpaMo wrote:i also do agree its a bad post

but im not responding to it anymore unless u rlly want me to, since everything is just easily either taken out of context / not thought about properly.

i realize if i dont respond then i get ur true thoughts on other ppl, than you just continuing to blindly tunnel me for no reason.

Alright, thats fine. So based on the whole interaction I had with GPA, i think Im confident in switching cows and Gpa in my reads list. I think cows is a bit scum here, because hes refusing to give AI content for the past while. He gave some reads but has shyed away alot from giving an explanation

Wait until you realise how much or little content T3 has provided.

After reading T3's ISO, I do agree with this statement so yea I might like James as town for now

........because he pointed out that T3 isn't providing content? how does that translate into a townread for you?

strange's entrance is fine, still townreading the slot

In post 390, The Bulge wrote:

In post 308, VFP wrote:Gut and because I'm ill.

ok, do you have any other gut feelings? (aside from any literal ones you may be experiencing as a result of your illness)

T3 scum?

In post 392, The Bulge wrote:

In post 341, VFP wrote:I want to discuss why I should vote there.

You wanted progress on the game so I'm trying to do it.

scummy response

Scummy shading.

In post 393, The Bulge wrote:James/VFP scumteam? i dig it

Buldge / T3 scum team?
I dig it.