Page 17 of 51

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 12:46 pm
by ZZZX
24 Hrs of no net

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 12:50 pm
by Lying Cat
Guilty Gunsmith wrote:See my comment above. We're not lynching you today anyway. Cool your nuts.

The bolding was so that nobody missed it, not for emphasis. My nuts are like ice. Italian ice.

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 1:38 pm
by Wickedestjr
Spoiler: Votecount 1.14
Votecount 1.14:


Josh_B - [2] - Guilty Gunsmith, T S O
T S O - [2] - ZZZX, BlueBloodedToffee
ZZZX - [1] - Lying Cat

Not voting - [4] - awestfie, Flubbernugget, Heartless, Josh_B

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2014-08-25 14:39:13)


Spoiler: Votecount 1.15
Votecount 1.15:


Josh_B - [2] - Guilty Gunsmith, T S O
T S O - [2] - ZZZX, BlueBloodedToffee
ZZZX - [1] - Lying Cat

Not voting - [4] - awestfie, Flubbernugget, Heartless, Josh_B

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2014-08-25 14:39:13)


Votecount 1.16


T S O - [3] - ZZZX, BlueBloodedToffee, Guilty Gunsmith
Josh_B - [1] - T S O
ZZZX - [1] - Lying Cat

Not voting - [4] - awestfie, Flubbernugget, Heartless, Josh_B

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2014-08-25 14:39:13)

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 2:33 pm
by Heartless
I'd like to see the vote count before casting a vote.

-TTH

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 3:10 pm
by Heartless
Antihero wrote:if that's what TTH feels is best, that's what she's going to do. i disagree, but i don't suppose to know everything and she's probably got a tighter rein on things here anyway.


Are you insane? I already feel like I'm way out of my league. I think the roles are reversed here and I need to stay out of
your
way because I feel like the remedial kid in the class.

I don't understand how you think TSO is scum or how BBT is town or how Lying Cat is town.

Heartless wrote:
Guilty Gunsmith wrote:TBH, there is no good reason to be townreading ZZZX right now. I'd ask you guys why you are townreading ZZZX but that would just generate bad reasons for townreading him.

~AP


well, i'm doing it and it feels good.


I know you're good at this game and all, Anti, but I actually think you
should
articulate your townread to AP. I see confirmation bias showing through in your answer here and if you get to the root of your read, I think you may find it's not entirely rational.

-TTH

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 3:28 pm
by Guilty Gunsmith
I am fairly certain ZZZX is town here. AP doesn't understand why but that's alright because I don't understand his Josh read. This really doesn't look like scum Z to me. His antics in Organic Chem are a pretty stark difference. I've nailed his alignment correctly every time I've played with him, and I'm confident in my read on him at the moment.

I don't know about LC anymore. I was basing my initial read off thinking Sthar had made the post I referenced. Jingle making it changes things. That read will need more sthar posting to gel.

ETL

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 9:08 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
So ZZZX and GG are town.

Leaning town on Josh.

Null on FN. Catch-up posts are so easy to make and pretty much always look pro-town so it gets ignored as far as being alignment indicative. Would like to see more.
Null on awestfie, I need to see some more, gut is telling me something is wrong here.
Need to ISO heartless/LC coz can't get a read on either for some reason.

TSO is scum. Surprised he is still alive.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 12:59 am
by Flubbernugget
Well yeah the catch up post is town looking, but theres nothing in there for you to springboard off of?

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:07 am
by Heartless
really? i thought it was scummy.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:09 am
by Heartless
Flubbernugget wrote:But who do I scum read? Right now, my biggest scum read is still Josh. Even when I'm defending him, I can't do so in confidence. A-west is leaning town for her intentions, but if I keep seeing weak arguments that's gonna change. Big fat null for GG and TSO. Although I have an eye on TSO. Also not digging some of his arguments. My big issue with these two is that I don't think I can read emotions very well. Definitely doesn't help that a hydra was in play.

This leads me to realize I have no reads in my notes on BBT, Heartless, or Lying Cat. I probably won't have much on cat, but I can go back and fix that for the other two.


>i'm defending him but i can't do so in confidence
>leaning
>big fat null
>i have an eye on...
>i have no reads on...

this is a big mushy piece of shit paragraph designed to
look
like opinions when there's nothing there that even remotely resembles an opinion

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:09 am
by Heartless
oh yeah, and "hydra" as an excuse to not have a read

/fart

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:10 am
by Heartless
VOTE: flubbernugget

executive powers activate

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:11 am
by Heartless
Flubbernugget wrote:So what I see from Heartless is that they were the only people that really tried to grill GG on anything (TSO doesn't count, and that was more defense than anything) and all they got was a town read off of GG. My gut says that's a mutual town read, but I have to think that one through. I also want to see how they read my catchup post.


/looks at activity overview....

48 posts and this is it?

:scumposting:

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:16 am
by Heartless
oh wait no, there's actually
more
than 48 posts because i'm not counting my main slips.

again, the "catchup" is a bunch of safe shit and there's really nothing useful to be gleaned from it.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:26 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
TSO, what do you think about LC's defence of you?

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:27 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
Flubbernugget wrote:Well yeah the catch up post is town looking, but theres nothing in there for you to springboard off of?

I don't like this. At all. The catch-up post is 'town looking'. I feel like that's a slip.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 2:43 am
by awestfie
I'm going to try and catch up, later today. Sorry that my activity has been quite low, just a lot of things happening right now.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 5:47 am
by T S O
I'm not answering any questions until you state why exactly you're scumreading me.

It's pathetic that GG is trying to skate around the fact they have nothing by refusing to talk to me. Pathetic.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:02 am
by Heartless
you know TSO, you could quit being an inflammatory asshole for the sake of being an inflammatory asshole (which i've
seen
you use to advance a scum win condition before) and actually, you know, give some solid scumreads.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:03 am
by Heartless
ETL where are you and what is AP saying to you about flubbernugget because i don't think he's doing a good enough job talking to you about that so i'll do it

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:05 am
by EspeciallyTheLies
I'm trying to finish this last report before I get too many hours overtime and then driving home. Give me 20 minutes.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:09 am
by Flubbernugget
Heartless wrote:oh yeah, and "hydra" as an excuse to not have a read

/fart

Heartless wrote:
Flubbernugget wrote:But who do I scum read? Right now, my biggest scum read is still Josh. Even when I'm defending him, I can't do so in confidence. A-west is leaning town for her intentions, but if I keep seeing weak arguments that's gonna change. Big fat null for GG and TSO. Although I have an eye on TSO. Also not digging some of his arguments. My big issue with these two is that I don't think I can read emotions very well. Definitely doesn't help that a hydra was in play.

This leads me to realize I have no reads in my notes on BBT, Heartless, or Lying Cat. I probably won't have much on cat, but I can go back and fix that for the other two.


>i'm defending him but i can't do so in confidence
>leaning
>big fat null
>i have an eye on...
>i have no reads on...

this is a big mushy piece of shit paragraph designed to
look
like opinions when there's nothing there that even remotely resembles an opinion


I explained everything I saw in the above paragraphs of that post and and then summarized my reads in my last paragraph. What seems to be the problem with my reads that you don't consider them valid opinions?

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:22 am
by Heartless
Flubbernugget wrote:I explained everything I saw in the above paragraphs of that post and and then summarized my reads in my last paragraph. What seems to be the problem with my reads that you don't consider them valid opinions?


no

you quoted random things and made little snipe-y comments about them that have that little bitter bite of scummy bitchiness in them. (the indignation over lying cat saying "gaslighting", "i have no idea what you're trying to read from your wagon")

they're not
invalid
opinions. they're not opinions at all. anything that comes close (your read on josh) is so clouded up and obscured by doublespeak that it's impossible to separate them from people you really do have no opinions on (which is.........
EVERYONE else
; except for canadian girl, you "lean town" on her which is more doublespeak)

unlike normal newbtownies, you don't seem to have a sense of the game as a whole and you don't seem to care. it looks like you're just mining at little things, hoping you look busy enough to everyone else.

it's textbook scum. unfortunately for you, i read the textbook.

you're scum.

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:25 am
by Heartless
also, you're not fooling anyone when you make a show talking about "your notes" (*wink wink*)

that's another thing

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:27 am
by Heartless
...and for someone who had "notes" on the TSO vs GG fight, you had shockingly little to say about it. in fact, they ended up being "big fat null". that's a pretty dissatisfying conclusion to come to.