Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 3:43 am
Found the Irish / Welsh / Scotsman?In post 172, Sunshine13 wrote:If you call me English one more time I'll shoot you.
I may or may not be talking about the game.
Found the Irish / Welsh / Scotsman?In post 172, Sunshine13 wrote:If you call me English one more time I'll shoot you.
I may or may not be talking about the game.
Agnetha Fältskog?In post 305, Mathdino wrote:my northside pal
There are only two things I can't stand in this world: People who are intolerant of suspect other players without explanation... and the Duck.In post 310, Mathdino wrote:I actually think TW is my top scumspect haha
Cuz I put it there, I guess.In post 404, ofrhz wrote:@AP- why is your vote on Oxy?
For the weird tw read or the weird AP read or
This seems like the worst reason to tr MdIn post 401, Draynth wrote: MathDino - I like his reasoning for scumreading TW, seems to be thinking about the game in a logical fashion.
Also seems like the worst reason to tr youofrhz - The structured approach to breaking down cases and stuff feels super townie (See 386)
Huh? Like most of his posts have been super agreeable or explaining what other people saidOxy - I find myself agreeing with a lot of what he's saying here
xdruru - seems pretty genuine
I don't think it's actually scum-indicative at all for now, more baity than scummyScum
Mohab500 - Lot of posting, lot of fluff.
Right. Tell me MOLE.In post 311, the worst wrote:Thats your paranoia speaking ignore me
I like expansive answers. I will generally strive to give them, too. If that results in a long post, so be it. It gives people a lot more to go on when forming reads. Brevity is something to be striven for, sure, but you also need to provide full answers so you don't get sucked into a back and forth of massive walls that takes time to write up and for other people to read and consider, when one wall with a proper answer will suffice.In post 386, ofrhz wrote:ok I'll do this point by point. sorry about long post
@Sunshine, This was your original question:In my original answer, I packaged my thoughts concisely for you. I actually thought I was doing you a favor given how people don't like wallposts on this site. I didn't realize you wanted me to literally regurgitate my thoughts.In post 308, Sunshine13 wrote:What are your thoughts regarding ruru voting me based on townreading you, then?
I actually am a newer player, so maybe I can empathize a lot with newer players.Your responses make sense if you’re buddying her, also if you give newer players some slack or if you’re just trying to look like you’re active without revealing too much. The first one is scum-leaning, the second NAI, the third mostly just anti-town. I note you answered the questions I asked to the letter,not really revealing that much more than when you evaded the initial question, just with more words and a bit more reference to your experiences with ruru. Not a good sign.
Just went over the fact that I didn't intentionally evade your original question. After I realized what you wanted, I did give you all of my thoughts about ruru's vote on me. (How many thoughts do you expect me to have on 298?) You can choose to believe that or not.
In post 386, ofrhz wrote:OK about this "falsehood," would you not say this is singling me out:I am disturbed by the falsehood I pointed out previously.You clearly made a few assumptions (that no one else was not-townreading you) when posting this. But at the time, I didn't realize this. That is why I said "Additionally, neither ruru nor I were townreading you, yet you chose to single me out for doing so.In post 296, Sunshine13 wrote: ofrhz is the only player so far not to townread me.I think this was genuine mistake on your part though." How is this a falsehood?
You've said I'm singling you out. Surely that's implying that I'm ignoring other people?In post 386, ofrhz wrote:?????? I never said this.This is also why I don’t likeofrhz saying I’m ignoring other people for not townreading me, as mentioned previously: when I voted, nobody else had said as much, and when ruru voted me, I put some pressure on her. You’ve joined that party, but I only have one vote *shrug*
I put a lot of effort in any single game, but I'm otherwise lazy. I won't look into another player's meta. You told me ruru is new, her posts come across as new, nobody has disputed these claims. It has been taken into consideration.In post 386, ofrhz wrote:Not at all. I think you should consider a player's experience when trying to read them. You didn't do this, which is why I think your read on ruru is wrong.Should I let someone who might be scum slide just because they’re new?
Would be interesting see you crack, Sunshine.In post 325, Sunshine13 wrote:I’m about to crack under the pressure guys.
Busy. Come back later. I'm trying to keep the stream going so how about you stop squeezing.
AH-HA! GOT'EM!! Bag 'em and shag 'em for me, will ya?
Hmm. So you're saying Math could actually be molesting the molecular system in mole-dova? Is that it?In post 352, skitter30 wrote:I mean, the point of the game is for town!you is to like, you know, try to figure out if math is trustworthy enough to follow instead of just listening to him?
Just listening to him cuz he's talking a lot isn't a really good idea if you're town - he could be scum trying to mislead you. And if you're scum, you've just absolved yourself of responsibility for your vote, cuz, after all, you were just listening to math, right?
Ah-ha! So you do trust in Dino being town himself here. Otherwise, why wouldn't scum.ruru try to distance herself from her partner?In post 356, skitter30 wrote:Pretty sure scum!you never starts a thing with dino here.