Mafiascum.net

In post 398, Ginngie wrote:

In post 393, springlullaby wrote:

In post 389, Hectic wrote:

In post 317, springlullaby wrote:For the record, I don't like how Hectic keeps chaining himself to a set of players in one sentence.

What do you mean by this?

You mention other player's name (probable town players) beside yours to create an averaging effect.
Same you did with "people who defended me".

Subtle form of buddying, a more manipulative form also.

Do you wanna play scum together one day?

You play mentioning stuff I dont feel like bringing up stuff cuz I dont know others will jive with it well.

In post 400, springlullaby wrote:Promise that you're not scum this game, and gimme leader then ok.

In post 402, springlullaby wrote:And you won't promise not being scum either then?

In post 399, springlullaby wrote:

In post 189, Hectic wrote:For this turn around. I know I did the same thing from Train Cop to Neighbouriser, but Bret's first post didn't give me the impression that he cared so much for fun.

Also, the philosophically believing mafia should have a strongman available is really strange. It's part of the game and will be balanced, why feel bad for scum not being able to strongman kill? An explanation from Bret himself would be great.

This is your vote on FOC, circa beginning of the game.
Do you think scum would actually openly vouch for a themselves keeping a good ability?

In post 393, springlullaby wrote:You mention other player's name (probable town players) beside yours to create an averaging effect.
Same you did with "people who defended me".

Subtle form of buddying, a more manipulative form also.

In post 407, Hectic wrote:

In post 393, springlullaby wrote:You mention other player's name (probable town players) beside yours to create an averaging effect.
Same you did with "people who defended me".

Subtle form of buddying, a more manipulative form also.

I get the defending part, but what do you mean by naming people alongside me? Elaborate on this "averaging effect".

In post 285, Hectic wrote:

In post 284, springlullaby wrote: So you believe Mastina/Lady Chloe/I were all intentionally leading the town down "bad" paths? Why am I scummier for it than the other two?

In post 408, Ginngie wrote:

In post 407, Hectic wrote:

In post 393, springlullaby wrote:You mention other player's name (probable town players) beside yours to create an averaging effect.
Same you did with "people who defended me".

Subtle form of buddying, a more manipulative form also.

I get the defending part, but what do you mean by naming people alongside me? Elaborate on this "averaging effect".

You make people feel like you're a unit together, that way they'll less likely to vote you if they like the other people. Plus when the others flip town it looks better on you cuz you were part of a group that was pretty town.

In post 375, Hectic wrote:

In post 364, Ame wrote:OK I've been thinking over some things. First, I change my mind, disable strongman is the way to go. Second, I don't trust Spring's agenda so I'm leaving the quest.

What don't you trust? springlullaby isn't getting the Leader position.

In post 409, springlullaby wrote:Instance in question.

In post 285, Hectic wrote:

In post 284, springlullaby wrote: So you believe Mastina/Lady Chloe/I were all intentionally leading the town down "bad" paths? Why am I scummier for it than the other two?

Translate
>They did it too (indicate awareness), but why me.

In post 411, springlullaby wrote:Anyway.

VOTE: Ginngie

In post 413, Hectic wrote:

In post 409, springlullaby wrote:Instance in question.

In post 285, Hectic wrote:

In post 284, springlullaby wrote: So you believe Mastina/Lady Chloe/I were all intentionally leading the town down "bad" paths? Why am I scummier for it than the other two?

Translate
>They did it too (indicate awareness), but why me.

That was to understand your reasoning for scumreading me and to see whether or not it was genuine/fabricated. Lady Chloe addressed this too earlier!

In post 415, springlullaby wrote:He failed to promise not being scum.

In post 416, springlullaby wrote:And you know Lady Chloe's alignment how?

In post 417, Ginngie wrote:

In post 415, springlullaby wrote:He failed to promise not being scum.

VOTE: spring

In post 418, Ame wrote:I just realized that farewell is a contraction of fare well. I mean it's obvious, it just never entered my conscious thought

In post 419, Hectic wrote:

In post 416, springlullaby wrote:And you know Lady Chloe's alignment how?

...these kind of gotcha moments are really hard not to scumread! I'm not gonna townread springlullaby for the same reason I was townreading Farkran for a bit in that Undertale game. Her arguing about nothing and missing the point of many posts/questions I've asked her is scum-indicative.

P.S: You need to use the HURT tags for captures.