Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 9:29 am
Yoink
yeahIn post 424, Formerfish wrote:I thought I was getting hung? See something shinier?In post 419, faüstiv wrote:UNVOTE:
sometimes you’ve got to shake the tree to see what falls.
VOTE: alimdia
Ok great, but how do your reads change?[/quote]In post 398, faüstiv wrote:If they were locktown obviously I’d re-evaluate my reads.In post 389, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I accept you are entitled to your reads. You are free to continue scumreading them but do me a favor, a little experiment. Assume for a moment both are confirmed town. How do your reads change?
I don’t think Farren ever flips scum though.
It's not why you shouldn't lynch there, it's why you should lynch people before her.In post 430, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:We have less than two days. This massive dispersion of votes is garbage.
Someone tell me why farren is town and shouldn’t be today’s lynch
In post 234, Formerfish wrote:You said we had no contact, direct or indirect, then list times where we had both. Gotcha, also ive been sick all weekend and have been playing on a limited basis. So yeah, in the last few pages you are correct, but you would be correct if you looked at any slot, not just the on you picked to harp on for your agenda to move forward.In post 230, Chibiie wrote:Here's your answer, btw:In post 227, Formerfish wrote:Failure to answer a direct question. Noted.In post 201, Chibiie wrote:Derailing from subject, will ignore, but not forget.In post 198, Formerfish wrote:See the problem with poking bears is that sometimes sleeping ones dont give a fuck who they swat.
VOTE: Chibs
Disingenuous scum can get rope, and i can go back to sleep now.Yes, I was talking about you two, I've pretty much wrote you names in the same post :/In post 211, Chibiie wrote:This is what I call a "bruh" moment.In post 209, Farren wrote:Post 27.- RQS
Posts 28- Interaction with ETL, not FF/ 32 - 34.- Indirect, objective view
Post 56 / 59 / 73 / 75.- Indirect, objective view
Gotta go, be back in a few hours.
In post 354, Formerfish wrote:Not really, not enough people participated and its the first time im using them, so its more of a long game thing than a short one.In post 353, alimdia wrote:Fish's different RV questions - did they ever get 'used' to deduce anything?
In post 355, Formerfish wrote:
is this just a condensing of the thread so far, this is a whole lot of iioa
After that, the majority of his posts are ...fluff. Interjecting and asking a bunch of fluff questions. I don't see a case here at all?In post 381, Formerfish wrote:In post 380, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Yes I asked him.In post 377, Formerfish wrote:Was this asked for or are you just tmiing about your vote now?In post 423, Formerfish wrote:I'm not getting lynched.In post 414, faüstiv wrote:Have you got anything to add to the game? Any reads or anything?In post 410, Formerfish wrote:Game is ongoing. Please don't talk about it.In post 408, faüstiv wrote:he threatened to DDOS someone in another game
You might be lynched so out them NOWIn post 425, Formerfish wrote:YoinkIn post 410, Formerfish wrote:Game is ongoing. Please don't talk about it.In post 408, faüstiv wrote:he threatened to DDOS someone in another game
Ok, i missed that. It doesnt feel as out of place knwoing that.
At this point, I'm happy with where my vote is. For some reason ETL thinks that Fish is just 'out of it' instead of being scum.In post 417, Farren wrote:alimdia: are you happy with where your vote is? Your predecessor had his vote on fish when he left the game.
Is this low-key coaching?In post 414, faüstiv wrote:Have you got anything to add to the game? Any reads or anything?In post 410, Formerfish wrote:Game is ongoing. Please don't talk about it.In post 408, faüstiv wrote:he threatened to DDOS someone in another game
You might be lynched so out them NOW
Why woudl faust be coaching me?In post 434, alimdia wrote:Is this low-key coaching?
Coaching as in telling you to say something, not literally in terms of experience.In post 435, Formerfish wrote:Why woudl faust be coaching me?In post 434, alimdia wrote:Is this low-key coaching?
Why would my scumpartner coach scumme in the main thread and not just start yelling at me in the scum PT?In post 436, alimdia wrote:Coaching as in telling you to say something, not literally in terms of experience.In post 435, Formerfish wrote:Why woudl faust be coaching me?In post 434, alimdia wrote:Is this low-key coaching?
Scum has daytalk?In post 437, Formerfish wrote:Why would my scumpartner coach scumme in the main thread and not just start yelling at me in the scum PT?In post 436, alimdia wrote:Coaching as in telling you to say something, not literally in terms of experience.In post 435, Formerfish wrote:Why woudl faust be coaching me?In post 434, alimdia wrote:Is this low-key coaching?
Newbie games always have daytalkIn post 439, Yodavader wrote:I know that in my other game, scum had a PT where they could talk all they want and give each other pointers. So, I would always assume that scum can daytalk.
Choo choo mofos
Thinking that scum might have tricked some of us by appearing town just makes us go around in circles. Its much safer to assume that, on Day1, the people that do things that are good for town, and look town, are townIn post 421, TheGildedSun wrote:UNVOTE: Farren
I'm not so confident in what to think anymore.
The idea that scum have tricked us all seems more and more likely.
I'm confused as to why ETL defends me so much even though I've dug myself into a hole quite a few times.
I can't tell if fish is trying to make faust look scummy or the other way around with this interaction lol.
I'm not sring Faust and I agree that you just town told. So I came off of you and went onto someone a. A TR of mine is voting, and b. Someone who is voting me.In post 446, alimdia wrote:I can't tell if fish is trying to make faust look scummy or the other way around with this interaction lol.
So @Faust, you aren't looking at Fish at all?
fIn post 446, alimdia wrote:I can't tell if fish is trying to make faust look scummy or the other way around with this interaction lol.
So @Faust, you aren't looking at Fish at all?