Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 5:37 am
Why must people who claim mason in their first post get mason roles instead of me. The world is so unfair.In post 395, mastina wrote:Hi I am a mason.
Why must people who claim mason in their first post get mason roles instead of me. The world is so unfair.In post 395, mastina wrote:Hi I am a mason.
TITUS IS PROBABLY A PROTECTOR OF STARCLAN THEN, THEY SEEM PRETTY INVESTED IN...UH... WHATEVER IT IS THEY'RE DOING.In post 423, Something_Smart wrote:Who wants to be the one to tell Bear there are confirmed to be no third parties?
In post 422, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:IS IT POSSIBLE THAT BY DESCRIBING DATISI'S SCUM POSTS AS WORKMANLIKE YOU ARE REFERRING TO THE ABSENCE OF DOUBT AND PARANOIA?In post 418, Bell wrote:I think I moderately agree with S_S on charloux. I missed that post. Sometimes people commit to a role early, but I don’t know them well enough to know if they’d do that so I think it’s probably okay just to give it a generic thumbs up.
I dunno what to say to the town core thing. Unless we use entirely different definitions of town cores the k my one I’d even consider would be Mastina at this point and that’s just a default.
I don’t know your history with these players to know if the people you’re town reading are the people you tend to clash with but I’m moderately surprised that you clash with marashu or that they clash much at all.
In post 424, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:IMO 386 LOOKS INFORMED. JUST DRYLY ADDRESSING CONCERNS AND CHATTING ABOUT TELLS.
I ADDRESSED A QUESTION TO YOU REGARDING YOUR DATISI TELL.In post 427, Bell wrote:Hah, bear didn’t know there were confirmed no third parties.
Learn to read. (*naturally I didn’t know this either*)
? Chat about all of them. Why do you think each is town? Rational and irrational reasons are fine.
I do think we have different definitions of town cores because I tend to think of town cores as players that you are reasonably confident are town. Which I don’t think you reasonably could be at this point.
Cephism spotted.In post 425, Cephrir wrote:Why must people who claim mason in their first post get mason roles instead of me. The world is so unfair.In post 395, mastina wrote:Hi I am a mason.
Why is Shiidaji town? That seems super random.In post 423, Something_Smart wrote:It's just the people I townread. My early game townreads are usually weird and unpopular; I'm happy to chat about any of them if you want to.
My goal is to flip mafia.In post 417, Charloux wrote:Mistyx, Datisi, Norweigan; What is even your goal with my wagon? Do you want me to explain my thought process for yesterday? Claim all my role details?
Explain my theory in detail? Do you want to get me to L-1 and act shocked when someone hammers?
am i really that awful to put up withIn post 429, Bell wrote:Cephism spotted.In post 425, Cephrir wrote:Why must people who claim mason in their first post get mason roles instead of me. The world is so unfair.In post 395, mastina wrote:Hi I am a mason.
+1 to Bell’s irritation.
As long as it's not an all-game running scum theatre like last time i'm cool with it.In post 432, Cephrir wrote:i appreciate mastina for putting me in my own category. i think that might be a good approach for us in general for game starts.
Reminds me of when my midterm assignment said the paper has to be 3600-4400 words and i delived a paper that was 3614 words.In post 433, Bell wrote:No, I’m not referring to an absence of doubt and paranoia.
I mean their posts look like homework. They’re trying to hit what they need to complete the assignment and not a single carbohydrate more.
Unless you know something about the setup that i, as town clan leader don't, you have 0 reason for me to be your main target of scum flipping attempt.In post 431, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My goal is to flip mafia.In post 417, Charloux wrote:Mistyx, Datisi, Norweigan; What is even your goal with my wagon? Do you want me to explain my thought process for yesterday? Claim all my role details?
Explain my theory in detail? Do you want to get me to L-1 and act shocked when someone hammers?
I BELIEVE THIS IS A GOOD DESCRIPTION OF THIS SERIES OF POSTS IN PARTICULAR:In post 380, Bell wrote:Go to class.
*pokes*
I can't concisely articulate a rebuttal to your argument that every post you make *has* to be toward producing content. Because I didn't say that.
I just think you treat the game more like a chore as scum than as town and your posts reflect that in how you use your ideology.
I would hope you couldn't disagree with the characterization given that's how you described it yourself in a scum PT or two.
In post 375, Datisi wrote:you said i have a townie vote, wtf
also fire - why did you unvote me when i was asleep? like, you knew my sleeping schedule beforehand, no?
In post 377, Datisi wrote:bc i can feel that i'm not in the vibe of the game yet, esp not in main thread, so i don't think i get much about your alignment by asking that
you can answer if it's something interesting ig
In post 381, Datisi wrote:if i think they're unreasonable or i sense bad faith from them, yesIn post 379, fireisredsir wrote:don't you usually like to sort people based on engaging with their pushes on you
i've olayed w you enough and ik you have played w me enough ti sense i was being kinda off
so i guessed that was why and didn't feel it's worthwhile to ask you about it
so in a way, yes i was waiting to see where you went with it because the current vote from you is boring nd doesn't tell me much
ans i do think i'm more engaged in the hood because i love posting in purple pts , i'll prob try to be conscious about it and not let myself get behind in the main thesd
@dann, why is my vote on charloux bad?
also pls excuse typos, currently speedwalking to class and trying ti not get hit by a csr
In post 382, Datisi wrote:i guess i'm more interested in how you are fitting this with my posts so far this game,but i'm also rapidly losing faith in this being s productive line of reasoningIn post 380, Bell wrote:I just think you treat the game more like a chore as scum than as town and your posts reflect that in how you use your ideology.
In post 386, Datisi wrote:@dann
i do think moonlogicy theories are townie, however my issue is that he assigned scum-motivation to one person for it when a lot of other people have done it, and he never commented on that. that's something that can potentially be scum motivated and i want him to explain his thoughts there
i don't want to vote val rn because i have been wrong before so i want to give more time to sit on that, and i don't think voting him will help me solve him (as it will with charloux)
@fire
i don't remember calling marashu boring (or saying anything about him, really) but i don't really have thoughts on him rn - i'm interested to see where he takes the datisi/bell theory
no thoughts head empty on catboi
why is it that you asked about the two of these specifically?
In post 388, Datisi wrote:something something good scumgame big paranoia etc etc
i did vaguely read your thoughts on him but they didn't really resonate with me one way or another, so
i was hoping to gain insight by seeing his read on me but apparently he has NONE so far so idk i will just be vibing there for now
I AM OBSERVING SOMETHING SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT THAN BELL THOUGH, WHAT IS STANDING OUT TO ME IS AN ABSENCE OF DOUBT, CURIOSITY AND PARANOIA IN DATISI'S POSTS. I AGREE THAT THEY DO READ LIKE HOMEWORK.In post 392, Datisi wrote:i will combat that bias by immediately forgetting who is in what clan
(but yes agreed, solving by "x scum in y hood" is dumb and we should not do it)
This for one. And your response to sussing FA felt very forced. "Sorry you don't have a sense of humor" was especially iffy response.In post 64, Charloux wrote:I was just messing with him?In post 61, catboi wrote:Would appreciate an answer to this!In post 47, Marashu wrote:I've posted in the ThunderClan PT. I don't see your post in there. Double-check that you posted in the right PT?In post 42, Charloux wrote:Task failed successfully i guess?In post 43, Bell wrote:My goal is to get eliminated within the first page for having a dog avatar.
Am i the only one in the thunderclan, nobody posted anything yet apart from me?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Charloux
IT'S OKAY, YOU NEED YOUR REST. IT TAKES EFFORT TO FABRICATE A GOOD SCUM READ.In post 439, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'll elaborate on what i don't like. Give me a sec.
HOW IS THIS MORE LIKELY TO COME FROM A DARK ONE?In post 440, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This for one. And your response to sussing FA felt very forced. "Sorry you don't have a sense of humor" was especially iffy response.In post 64, Charloux wrote:I was just messing with him?In post 61, catboi wrote:Would appreciate an answer to this!In post 47, Marashu wrote:I've posted in the ThunderClan PT. I don't see your post in there. Double-check that you posted in the right PT?In post 42, Charloux wrote:Task failed successfully i guess?In post 43, Bell wrote:My goal is to get eliminated within the first page for having a dog avatar.
Am i the only one in the thunderclan, nobody posted anything yet apart from me?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Charloux
WHY?In post 440, NorwegianboyEE wrote:"Sorry you don't have a sense of humor" was especially iffy response.
DOES THIS LOOK LIKE SHADE TO ANYONE ELSE? THIS SEEMS VERY PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE IN A WAY THAT A DARK ONE MAY ALLOW TO SEEP INTO THEIR POSTS.In post 419, Charloux wrote:Apart from these, the only one who left a strong opinion on me is bear. Mentally i don't like him, but his posts looks really towny