VOTE: NorwegianboyEE.In post 148, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So guys, i'm trying to change my font and playstyle for this game. Tell me if you like it. <3
I like it, it makes revealing your true colors quite easy.
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE.In post 148, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So guys, i'm trying to change my font and playstyle for this game. Tell me if you like it. <3
Town.In post 161, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:BE A HERO, LEARN FIRE PREVENTION
VOTE: NORWEGIANBOY
OUR LEADER (CHARLOUX) SEEMS ALIGNED WITH STARCLAN BECAUSE OF THEIR POSTS IN OUR CLAN PT
Town?In post 167, Val89 wrote:It may be obvious from the colouring + lack of partners that your role pm is one belonging to the uninformed majority, but if you were in possession of such, you would also have (and I assume it's acceptable to quote directly now it is given publicly) the wincon given to starclan -In post 159, Something_Smart wrote:And I don't think confirming role + alignment rules out clan confusion; it's usually easy to tell alignment from coloring + lack of partners/obvious scum info, even if you don't fully understand the factions or the wincon."You and all other members of the protectors of StarClan win when all Dark Forest cats have been eliminated."- which is patently clear on the issue bell expressed confusion about.
That's my hypothesis - that scum!bell was trying to replicate that selfmeta of 'derping about set up early game and asking the most basic questions that are usually also “town slippy”' without access to a critical piece of information - how the wincon was presented to starclan; and thus failing to realise there was zero, none, nada ambiguity there to 'town slip' over. I don't buy the post-sample explanation that starclan!bell thought "dark forest cats" was some larger descriptor for two or more scum clans without also believing that starclan was some larger descriptor for the town clans, and thus windclan, thunderclan, etc to be pure; and that's never going to pass review. It's nonsensical.
I can easily see town!SS realising this situation has only arisen because of the lack of a publicly posted sample PM, and thus suffer some sort of second-hand guilt on behalf of the dark forest for having a member outed so early over what is arguably a mod mistake, but why defend him now?
Hard to say for sure but I think I vibe with that read.In post 181, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:CHANGE MISTYX FROM SUS TO TRUSTWORTHY
In post 187, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You know, all of these catvatars are a bit distracting because i can't differentiate the players anymore.
Of course I am………In post 372, Datisi wrote:
@penguin, why did you vote 2nd leading wagon instead leading wagon (are you a competing wagons kinda penguin, i forget)
VOTE: charloux - 363
elaborateIn post 407, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: Charloux
I think there’s been major off vibes from this slot. They’ve been involved in multiple shifty scenarios now and their responses always pinged me as weird.
In post 409, KittyTacky wrote:It's Charloux.
I'm town.
*squints*
In post 351, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:IS IT POSSIBLE TO GET FURTHER CLARITY FROM THE MODERATOR ABOUT WHEN/HOW ALIGNMENT WAS RANDOMIZED?
This post seems pretty town. Generally I see scum being too afraid to vaguely reference their role like this, because it requires planning out a specific fakeclaim and committing to it. (And it's pretty hard to retroactively come up with a fakeclaim that matches a soft like this.)In post 236, Charloux wrote:It's a theory based on Titus claim, the number of people in my pt and the details of my role.
3 more people have yet to post, and we can't confirm that everybody who posted is a member of a clan.
TITUS POTENTIAL THIRD PARTY.In post 417, Charloux wrote:So my wagon looks like this:
Frozen Angel, Something_Smart, Titus, Mistyx, Datisi, Kitty, Norweigan.
DARK ONE POST IMOIn post 386, Datisi wrote:@dann
i do think moonlogicy theories are townie, however my issue is that he assigned scum-motivation to one person for it when a lot of other people have done it, and he never commented on that. that's something that can potentially be scum motivated and i want him to explain his thoughts there
i don't want to vote val rn because i have been wrong before so i want to give more time to sit on that, and i don't think voting him will help me solve him (as it will with charloux)
@fire
i don't remember calling marashu boring (or saying anything about him, really) but i don't really have thoughts on him rn - i'm interested to see where he takes the datisi/bell theory
no thoughts head empty on catboi
why is it that you asked about the two of these specifically?
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT BY DESCRIBING DATISI'S SCUM POSTS AS WORKMANLIKE YOU ARE REFERRING TO THE ABSENCE OF DOUBT AND PARANOIA?In post 418, Bell wrote:I think I moderately agree with S_S on charloux. I missed that post. Sometimes people commit to a role early, but I don’t know them well enough to know if they’d do that so I think it’s probably okay just to give it a generic thumbs up.
I dunno what to say to the town core thing. Unless we use entirely different definitions of town cores the k my one I’d even consider would be Mastina at this point and that’s just a default.
I don’t know your history with these players to know if the people you’re town reading are the people you tend to clash with but I’m moderately surprised that you clash with marashu or that they clash much at all.
It's just the people I townread. My early game townreads are usually weird and unpopular; I'm happy to chat about any of them if you want to.In post 418, Bell wrote:I dunno what to say to the town core thing. Unless we use entirely different definitions of town cores the k my one I’d even consider would be Mastina at this point and that’s just a default.
I think it's because I tend to townread people who play in a chaotic or irrational-seeming way. Marashu isn't like that particularly, I just don't really know them.I don’t know your history with these players to know if the people you’re town reading are the people you tend to clash with but I’m moderately surprised that you clash with marashu or that they clash much at all.