Page 20 of 22
Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:59 pm
by Kirbyoshi
Yos, if you look at my 429, you'll see that under most of my points (and I know you think I use that word loosely, but I don't), I put something to the effect of "you should know this." I would have put it with all the points, but didn't, for the sake of not being redundant. The fact that she should know it tells me she's intentionally trying to lead town down the wrong path.
Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:53 pm
by Yosarian2
Kirbyoshi wrote:Yos, if you look at my 429, you'll see that under most of my points (and I know you think I use that word loosely, but I don't), I put something to the effect of "you should know this." I would have put it with all the points, but didn't, for the sake of not being redundant. The fact that she should know it tells me she's intentionally trying to lead town down the wrong path.
Except you're just obviously wrong about all of it, and as you would say, you should know this. Him wanting to discuss mechanics is not a scum tell; everyone in the game did that. Him pointing out that us not attacking for the first phase can work because if only the scum attack it'll be obvious who they are is not a scum tell; you can call it WIFOM if you want, but it's still a reasonable point. Him thinking that the Tony case is be pushed by scum isn't a scum tell, that's a normal thing for a townie to try to figure out (although I'm still curious why he thinks that), while your response to him saying that seems like one to me. On the other hand, the way you attacked nuwen without having a case is a scum tell on your part.
And not only was nothing you said in 429 any kind of case against drow, I already explained why none of it was any kind of case. And I think you already know I'm right, or you wouldn't just be making vauge references towards "Oh, I already explained that."
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:48 am
by Kirbyoshi
Yos wrote:the way you attacked nuwen without having a case is a scum tell on your part.
Do I have to create a new thread in Mafia Discussion and title it "NUWEN IS NOT SCUM IN MELEE MAFIA"? I have never attacked her. Everyone, please stop saying that I have.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:07 am
by Yosarian2
Kirbyoshi wrote:Yos wrote:the way you attacked nuwen without having a case is a scum tell on your part.
Do I have to create a new thread in Mafia Discussion and title it "NUWEN IS NOT SCUM IN MELEE MAFIA"? I have never attacked her. Everyone, please stop saying that I have.
Ok, fine. That wasn't really relevant to anything anyway.
I'm really not happy with the way you are acting. You made a claim, that Hohum was "delibratly misleading the town". I asked you to explain, and all you keep doing is referencing an old post that dosn't actually prove that at all. You're basically cornering me into defending Drow here, which I don't really want to do because I'm not happy with him at the moment, just in order to try to get an answer out of you.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:31 am
by chamber
unvote vote nuwen
In light of grover replacing and me liking kirbys recent posts.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:05 pm
by drowmage
@Mod: taking an emergency V/LA until monday
I'll get a post up when I get back.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:42 pm
by chamber
Someone needs to attack someone.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:44 pm
by Kirbyoshi
Someone needs to get back to the thread and get this game moving again *cough*TSQ*cough*
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:00 pm
by Nuwen
chamber wrote:unvote vote nuwen
In light of grover replacing and me liking kirbys recent posts.
What do Kirby's posts and Grover replacing out have to do with my alignment?
~~~
Okay. This game stalled hard. We need two replacements, and I'd prefer to interact with them outside of massive catchup posts - two blind spots on Day 1 ain't cool.
There's no real time deadline for the day. I'm all for holding off and posting as little content as possible until replacements step in. I usually don't like putting games on hold, but since we're not pressed with a time deadline there's no reason to continue spitting out content. There's a nice start-stop mechanic built into this game. As long as everyone else is willing to pick up on the dime, I think this'll work. Don't start attacking or throwing around suspicion all willy nilly just to pump life into the game - that'll restart the RVS phase and make reads even more difficult.
In the meantime, reread and I want to hear who everyone thinks is scum
independently
and who's
dependent
scum. Simple and succinct posts, please.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:01 pm
by Nuwen
^ The above is practical because I know TSQ is in finals season and will probably be driving cross country soon. I don't expect to see much activity on his end.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:35 pm
by Yosarian2
I don't think stalling a game while hoping to get two replacements is ever a good idea. That just results in more lurkers, and probably in the game just crashing and burning, or else ending badly.
I'm quite close to just attacking the person with the most votes and trying to get this game moving; at the moment, that would be Kirby.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:23 pm
by chamber
Nuwen wrote:chamber wrote:unvote vote nuwen
In light of grover replacing and me liking kirbys recent posts.
What do Kirby's posts and Grover replacing out have to do with my alignment?
Directly? absolutely nothing. Relatively, with them removed, you are next on my list though.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:24 pm
by Nuwen
Why?
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:09 pm
by Kirbyoshi
@Yos's 478 (sorry, didn't see it before): ??? Just because a post is old, does that mean it isn't there? And btw, ask me any straight question, related to something
that actually happened
, and I'll be happy to answer it for you.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:17 pm
by Kast
@Nuwen/Y2-
It does feel like this is stalling out. I don't mind as it would be better to get replacements instead of having players melee turns be auto-skipped.
Since TSQ is apparently busy or V/LA, there's not much to be done and I think the non-replacing players have pretty much made their thoughts clear (except Stark).
@KY-
-Can you name your feats?
-What experience do you have with d20 game systems?
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:35 pm
by Snow_Bunny
chamber wrote:Someone needs to attack someone.
Vote for Kirby, then.
Meh, this game is stalling badly. That's why we need deadlines. Mod! Where are you???
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:42 pm
by Snow_Bunny
~The Real Unofficial Vote Count~
Kirby (5) - Yos, Tajo, Bunny, drow, TM
Tony (2) - Kast, Nuwen,
Yos (1) - Grover
drowmage (1) - Kirby
Nuwen (1) - chamber
Not voting: Kirby, farside*, stark
I think I have it right.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:53 pm
by Kirbyoshi
Kast wrote:@KY-
1.
Can you name your feats?
2.
What experience do you have with d20 game systems?
1.
Kirb, in his claim post, wrote:I also have a +2 bonus to any saving throw I make.
My feat is that I can redirect any missed attack intended for me, but the redirection has a -4.
2. None. Trying to not use that too much as an excuse though.
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:54 pm
by Kirbyoshi
Oh yeah, and Snow, you have me on the votecount twice. Not complaining, but you might wanna fix it for the next one
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:44 pm
by Kast
@KY-
1. I know you can list what your feats do. I want to know if you can provide a name for your feats. Specifically, can you provide a name for your second feat?
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:18 pm
by Kirbyoshi
Oh, ok. Not sure it'll help determine my alignment, but it's "Fade Into Violence".
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:42 pm
by Yosarian2
Kirbyoshi wrote:@Yos's 478 (sorry, didn't see it before): ??? Just because a post is old, does that mean it isn't there? And btw, ask me any straight question, related to something
that actually happened
, and I'll be happy to answer it for you.
I've been asking you to quote me where it was that drow "intentionally mislead the town" for days now, and you've just ignored the question or pretended you already answered it.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:46 am
by Snow_Bunny
More Kirby votes, please.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:06 am
by TonyMontana
Kirbyoshi wrote:Oh, ok. Not sure it'll help determine my alignment, but it's "Fade Into Violence".
Thought that name sounded weird, compared to my own feats, but a quick google revealed it to be an actual feat from dnd with more or less the same attributes as what kirb's claimed.
And no, it won't help determine alignment.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:56 am
by Kast
Oh, ok. Not sure it'll help determine my alignment, but it's "Fade Into Violence".
Your claimed feat is something that would naturally disincline players from attacking you.
-If you were false claiming, it was possible you might not have thought it through (this is not the case).
-With 13AC, most attacks are liable to miss and trigger your feat (effectively giving you bonus attacks). I'm a bit surprised that you have not emphasized this.