Well, I think it’s too early to be doing something like this, but I think discussion is lacking and I think this might kick it back into gear.
Beaker
: Has contributed absolutely nothing of substance so far. Voted the Mod, gave an OMGUS vote on Fritz (which was later retracted). We need to hear his suspicions now, instead of him trying to explain himself. He is 55-45 on scumdar, could go either way.
Coolbot
: Helped point out the pointlessness of the Beaker bandwagon. Currently his suspicions are on Nazgul, with two sets of reasoning (early lurker hunts and being the first person to mention dead scum). 45-55 on scumdar, less likely to be scum than others.
Cropcircles
: Practically admitted that he had been lurking, then gave an OMGUS vote (on the third page of the game) which was immediately rescinded. Then he counters the accusation of “not doing anything” by saying that he is not the only player who is “not doing anything”, which is not an argument, as it does not change the fact that Cropcircles has done anything yet. He admits to his post being worthless, but apparently does not seem to see what is wrong with that, seems a tad defensive. 60-40, more likely than others to be scum.
Fritzler
: Tries to push a little bandwagon on Beaker (for joke post voting Mod), and then later says his reason for voting was that players should attempt to find scum, not vote the Mod. Since I consider voting for the Mod equivalent to “no-voting”, I only have slight qualms about it (since I really don’t see an advantage to not voting at the beginning of the game, as it is one of the easiest ways to get a reaction). However, I get the feeling he is just trying to boost up his “posts per day” by wasting space. 50-50 so far.
Glork
: Agreed that the bandwagon on Beaker was unfounded. He thinks Ibaesha is pro-town, is getting bothered with Pwnz’s short posts, and votes Nazgul for being the first to mention dead scum. 50-50 for me. Although I should probably consider the fact that Glork is almost always scum. Hm.
Ibaesha
: Has mentioned the ‘sexiness’ of the Beaker bandwagon a couple times. Missed Beaker’s vote on Fritz, and thinks Glork is being ‘careful’. Playing note: rarely unvotes without voting somebody else. I will have to check your other games to see if I can verify this, but has shown tendency to vote for either Glork or Raj if she changes directions. 55-45 to me, a bit more likely than others to be scum, I am not getting the same vibes as Glork.
Nazgul
: Agrees that the bandwagon on Beaker is just as stupid as other D1 random bandwagons, but seems okay with silly lurker hunts early in the game. However, because Nazgul is newer, I get the feeling newer players only need about a day of not posting to qualify as “lurking”, or at least I get that feeling from newer players. 55-45 so far.
Pwnz
: Says that I’m less likely to be scum since my jaw was bashed in last night, so plus points for him. Asked Beaker for a defense and others for input. Points out Glork keeping his vote on somebody he had just agreed with, and agrees that Cropcircles has done little. Seems on the ball so far. 40-60, much less likely than others to be scum.
Rajrhcpfreak
: Bandwagons on Beaker, telling him “you’re mafia”. He later says that he doesn’t think Beaker is scum (at least when he voted for him?). However, he picks apart Cropcircles “worthless post” fairly well, and I agree with him on much of that post. I think the two balance each other out well enough, so a 50-50 for Raj as well.
PetroleumJelly
: The epitomy of being pro-town. He is just lookin’ for some lovin’. <3 Clearly 0-100, no chance of being scum whatsoever.
60: Cropcircles
55: Beaker, Ibaesha, Nazgul
50: Fritzler, Glork, Raj
45: Coolbot
40: Pwnz
0: PJ
Given that, I might as well
Unvote: Ibaesha
and mosey on over to a
Vote: Cropcircles
.
Elvis_Knits wrote:PJ, you may not have a vote, but you have influence.
It is six to lynch.
Elvis makes me sad.