↑Wickedestjr wrote:In order for the town to perform a no-lynch, you would have to first ignore the part where I said you couldn't no-lynch and then embarrass yourselves trying to do it even though you can't.
CHALLENGE ACCEPTED
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:12 pm
by awestfie
↑T S O wrote:I also don't understand how #23 could work save for hopelessly naive mafia, but whatever.
It's not something that "works," it's something that's just nice to keep in mind. Having a pool of people who are most likely to be veto'ed makes it so that those people are marginally safer to lynch rather than someone who would most likely not be veto'ed.
↑Guilty Gunsmith wrote:In all seriousness we should quicklynch him.
We aren't quick-lynching, at all; it would only hurt town and; this game can easily be won, just by having solid town-reads. I'm really not liking your posts, so far; and I don't have to point at them; because I genuinely just don't like any of your posts, up to this point.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 9:03 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
3 pages of fluff. Nice.
I'm down for quick-lynching Josh B.
VOTE: Josh B
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:12 pm
by ZZZX
Lets start choosen hunting stuff.
First of all I want all of you to answer a quicky. If you were scum who would you veto and why.?
If you are scum now and lied I have "ways" to find you mainly. so this should be good.
go ahead and give me ur lists.
Mine are mainly GG / Heartless
I dont think anyone would veto me since I am an easyish lynch mostly.
I'd prob veto GG. Mainly because I think AP is considered to be quite a good player across the site so I would like to be able to NK him in confidence. Also because I don't know many of the other players either.
yep. I'd guess either us or Heartless were veto'd.
If I were scum I'd def veto Heartless. <3
Only ones I know here are ZZZX, Heartless, and TSO.
↑T S O wrote:Do you think it was a complete coincidence that the series of events occured:
Head 1 of the hydra posts.
Head 2 posts less than a minute later.
Head 1 expresses surprise.
Do you think it just so happened that the two of them randomly came on within a minute of each other?
What is your opinion on post #13?
None of that happened lol... AP was fucking around. My first post in the thread entirely was my egopost.
↑awestfie wrote:We aren't quick-lynching, at all; it would only hurt town and; this game can easily be won, just by having solid town-reads. I'm really not liking your posts, so far; and I don't have to point at them; because I genuinely just don't like any of your posts, up to this point.
You need to get the stick out of your ass and figure out what is clearly not serious and what is. I am likely to be the serious one, and I pretty much always sign my posts, so if you have a problem reading AP, you can talk to me.
↑Guilty Gunsmith wrote:TSO is town I guess. I cant see a scummy getting their panties all in a bunch over what he is getting his bunched up over.
Agreed, AP.
↑awestfie wrote:Yeah, I'm clearly defending when I say it's not an alignment-tell when it clearly isn't. Bad post.
TSO says "dey so scummies!!" and you go, "Meh, it's not alignment indicative." It IS a defense, if a soft one. And for the record, calling something "bad post" doesn't make you any better at the game than us.
↑ZZZX wrote:GG is town and TSO is annoyingly scummy so far. VOTE: TSO
Yes we are and no he's not. You're town on my list so far though, good job.
↑Josh_B wrote:This game is going to be too easy. VOTE: No Lynch
The chosen cannot be night killed. If the chosen make it to the last 4 players in the game, the town wins.
I don't even have to kill a single scum, so long as I don't lynch a chosen. Who wants to help me AUTOWIN?
Hey awestfie!
^ This is a bad post. Why did you not comment on it other than to cite the wiki? Do you not see what he's doing?
ZZZX, TSO town reads so far. Eagerly awaiting a Heartless post
ETL
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:57 am
by Wickedestjr
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:29 am
by ZZZX
Mainly GG is town but so far he is a main veto target (unless he is scum or scum dont want him dead)
here is another question. Who do you think would veto you and why?
I need to think of an answer to this one. Lol
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:31 am
by ZZZX
Personally the only people to think about veto'ing me are Heartless/TSO/BBT/GG and even then it would be a random veta.
Me being an easy lynch alot annoys me. Lucky for me I got a few players here who can read me well. Damn I wish I am chosen.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:31 am
by ZZZX
No way to know for sure thou.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:06 am
by Guilty Gunsmith
↑ZZZX wrote:Who do you think would veto you and why?
Anyone who knows us (Antihero, TSO, you, and apparently anyone else here who knows AP) and for the reason that AP is not only a good scumhunter, but a very strong player who can easily lead the game, and as Anti has put it in the past "who the herd will follow". Personally, I think I'm a fairly decent scumhunter, and AP and I work pretty well together. I don't know the last time either of us actually made it to LYLO as town.
I don't think lynching the person that most people think has been veto'd is a good strategy at all. I think scumhunting is a good strategy. I don't disagree that the person most likely to be veto'd is a "safer" lynch, but I do think this is a last resort kind of condition when evaluating who to lynch for the day.
ETL
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:17 am
by Heartless
I haven't been able to talk to Antihero about this game, but my first impression is that I don't trust Guilty Gunsmith.
Antihero, if you're reading this, actually pick up when I call tonight.
-TellTaleHeart (I will be abbreviating this to -TTH in the future)
First of all I want all of you to answer a quicky. If you were scum who would you veto and why.?
This is tough for me to answer because not only do I have next to no meta on anyone here, most of what I do have is from games that are currently on going. I would rather not get modkilled for accidentally slipping about an ongoing game.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:24 am
by EspeciallyTheLies
↑Heartless wrote:my first impression is that I don't trust Guilty Gunsmith.
lol... alright. I'll bite.
Why?
p-edit: Just pretend the other game doesn't exist and never existed. Don't even mention it.
↑Heartless wrote:my first impression is that I don't trust Guilty Gunsmith.
lol... alright. I'll bite.
Why?
p-edit: Just pretend the other game doesn't exist and never existed. Don't even mention it.
woops. and so it begins.
ETL
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:28 am
by Flubbernugget
↑ZZZX wrote:Mainly GG is town but so far he is a main veto target (unless he is scum or scum dont want him dead)
here is another question. Who do you think would veto you and why?
I need to think of an answer to this one. Lol
I don't think anyone would veto me unless they were trying to pull some really,
really
ballsy WIFOM shenanigans. Again, there's just no meta on me.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 4:40 am
by T S O
↑ZZZX wrote:GG is town and TSO is annoyingly scummy so far. VOTE: TSO
Please elaborate, your cases are so usually top-class and your history of reading me so often correct that I'm particularly excited to hear you've formed a scumread on me.
It's also a bit disturbing that you called me scum, GG called me Town, and then you immediately accepted this without pushing your read. Why?
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:14 am
by ZZZX
When the duck did I accept you as town? And no I can't make a case that good at page 1 .
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:27 am
by T S O
So, what you're saying is, you think I'm Scum, but you have no problems with other players completely disagreeing with that, you're not seeking to either change their opinion or have them change yours, and also you can't actually articulate why you think I'm scum.
And you wonder why I'm so often derisive to you.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:29 am
by Guilty Gunsmith
↑T S O wrote:And you wonder why I'm so often derisive to you.
Are you just beating him over the head for the sake of it or do you think this thing he does all the time (based on what you're saying) is alignment indicative?
ETL
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:31 am
by T S O
I have a theory where if I constantly point it out he may actually correct it.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:32 am
by T S O
This question about "who would YOU veto gaiz" is really bad and has no advantages.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:34 am
by ZZZX
Its not. Once we get a few flips you will see how good it is
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:35 am
by ZZZX
Also you are not in a leading position this game e.g. revolution
Explain
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:36 am
by Guilty Gunsmith
↑T S O wrote:I have a theory where if I constantly point it out he may actually correct it.
good luck with that! lmao... I have given up on trying to change anyone. And he's not as terrible as some.
↑T S O wrote:This question about "who would YOU veto gaiz" is really bad and has no advantages.
meh. I wouldn't say it's really bad, and I wouldn't say it has no advantages, but I would say that the manner in which he went about it is not the usual useless question type thing he does as scum (see Organic Chemistry).
I've got a fairly decent townread on him at the moment for the fact that he seems interested in the answers, rather than just making town noises. Know what I mean?