What was good about 30? What was not good about 32?
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:40 am
by necargoface
Hola! I am necargoface, and let's get a few things out of the way:
-This is like my 4th mafia game in the last 5 years.
-I am generally lazy.
-I generally like wagons (probably because I'm lazy)
So, by skimming (because I'm lazy) we have an L-2 because... someone doesn't like RVS's? Is that a legit reason to put someone at L-1? At least we didn't get an intent to hammer (because that would just be hilariously bad).
So, here's my RV (although not actually an RV because his vote was odd and somewhat scummy):
VOTE: Honest Because his avatar is ironic. That's L-1.
PEDIT: Soooo, we HAD an L-2 because someone didn't like RVS's. Now it's because of a naked vote that's quite odd. Makes sense.
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 12:05 pm
by YurikoJasmine
Really? Putting someone at l-1 because of RV?
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 12:11 pm
by Draynth
@Necargoface: It seems weird to me that you have an issue with people putting someone at L-1 and yet you put someone at L-1 with your 'RV'.
↑Draynth wrote:@Necargoface: It seems weird to me that you have an issue with people putting someone at L-1 and yet you put someone at L-1 with your 'RV'.
Thank you for putting "RV" in quotation marks, because it was not really an RV. Definitely not actually an RV. Do you guys read what I put in my quotation marks?
Vote stays on Honest because he hasn't posted since the vote explaining why he should not be hammered. I will still violently go after whomever hammers him without warning, however.
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:51 pm
by Dierfire
↑necargoface wrote:Vote stays on Honest because he hasn't posted since the vote explaining why he should not be hammered. I will still violently go after whomever hammers him without warning, however.
It sounds as though you think that he would flip Town. Do you?
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 4:35 pm
by YurikoJasmine
You know if you were voting for a reason there's no need for you to name it RV. The only reason you should do so is because you know your reason sucks so you cover it up with a "RV" label should people ask about it in later games. And now when people frown on you you quickly defend your vote like he's your scumread all along.
vote: necargoface
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:01 pm
by fferyllt
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:09 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Anyone planning on stating intent to hammer?
Just to be clear, that is not a vote, but an intent to vote.
Just to be clear, that is not a vote, but an intent to vote.
Nope
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 2:34 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
Why not?
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 2:58 am
by necargoface
↑Draynth wrote:@Necargoface: It seems weird to me that you have an issue with people putting someone at L-1 and yet you put someone at L-1 with your 'RV'.
Something else to note: I don't have a problem with putting people at L-1. I have a problem with a stupid reason putting people at L-1. Not liking RVS's? That's a stupid reason. One post in the whole game so far with no context whatsoever and no actual input to the game? Better reason. I'm not moving my vote until Honest posts and actually puts something into the game.
Vote stays on Honest because he hasn't posted since the vote explaining why he should not be hammered.
That's an awful reason for your vote
I am voting because he has posted once this entire game with a naked, contextless, useless post, and has not responded to any of the resulting backlash.
Because we shouldn't hammer Honest until he responds to all the backlash he's getting.
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 3:04 am
by necargoface
↑YurikoJasmine wrote:You know if you were voting for a reason there's no need for you to name it RV. The only reason you should do so is because you know your reason sucks so you cover it up with a "RV" label should people ask about it in later games. And now when people frown on you you quickly defend your vote like he's your scumread all along.
vote: necargoface
I like RV's. I didn't get to make one in the early stages. I made an RV. I realized there was a pretty obvious vote. I voted Honest.
The reason I put the RV label on it is because I like RV's and wanted to make an RV, but didn't want to input nothing to that post either. Not because I have a horrid reason.
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 3:09 am
by necargoface
God, I'm bad at remembering to reply to all the posts that I want to.
↑necargoface wrote:Vote stays on Honest because he hasn't posted since the vote explaining why he should not be hammered. I will still violently go after whomever hammers him without warning, however.
It sounds as though you think that he would flip Town. Do you?
He could flip town. I don't think he would, but he could. I will violently go after anyone who randomly hammers without stating an intent to hammer because random hammering doesn't give the defendant a chance to speak.
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 3:29 am
by YurikoJasmine
I disagree with the content/ mindset towards RV in 68 but it looks pretty town motivated to me
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 3:30 am
by YurikoJasmine
unvote:
unvote tag fixed so the automatic vote counter will recognize it -f
1) honest hasn't posted anything of content and I'd rather see something from him than have him dead now
2) I'm against policy lynch
3) it's too early d1 to lynch anyone yet imo
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 3:34 am
by YurikoJasmine
Not to mention he's VERY null to me now
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 3:47 am
by ZeroSummer
I mean of course he's null. He has one post which is just a naked vote. We shouldn't hammer until he posts more though.