Mafiascum.net

anyway

VOTE: dwlee99

In post 44, Save The Dragons wrote:what if you're shit at crumbing things

i can't believe i forgot to vote

VOTE: osuka

I'm right there with you, which is why I recommend multiple targets. Even if you're obvious scum won't know which you target if you are even a PR at all.

For instance, if you leave a doctor and a cop crumb, then scum won't know if you're healing or copping someone. You could be crumbing a roleblock as well.

then what's the point if you leave multiple crumbs

In post 52, Save The Dragons wrote:then what's the point if you leave multiple crumbs

When you flip, the game is still solveable. For instance, the cop is not checking someone who was obvtown at the time. The doc isn't healing someone widely scumread. Crumbing both still gives scum no clue but lets town solve after their death.

I think DW is town. I sorta skimmed and I'm going to reread it but I think the whole "don't claim, roles won't help us figure shit out" is very untrue. I don't really think DGB is scum for it b/c I could see how town that just got burned could think that.

Nero's opposition, although I disagree with it, feels townier. Dwlee99 feels more desperate.

In post 29, petapan wrote:for the record i have setup-related thoughts but they're not for sharing in the early game, will talk more about it later

like this seems like a scum post.

I still feel we should analyze claims but the crumbs help prevent fake claims.

Hello everybody, goodmorning friends

In post 54, Nero Cain wrote:I think DW is town. I sorta skimmed and I'm going to reread it but I think the whole "don't claim, roles won't help us figure shit out" is very untrue. I don't really think DGB is scum for it b/c I could see how town that just got burned could think that.

In post 56, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 29, petapan wrote:for the record i have setup-related thoughts but they're not for sharing in the early game, will talk more about it later

like this seems like a scum post.

lol nero chainsawing for his buddy already

In post 33, petapan wrote:yes please try to double down on your sidetrack because you think you have

such a great point

peta is just all up on DBG's backside here

i literally never make that post about the setup as scum and it'll be apparent why when i talk about it

In post 59, petapan wrote:

In post 54, Nero Cain wrote:I think DW is town. I sorta skimmed and I'm going to reread it but I think the whole "don't claim, roles won't help us figure shit out" is very untrue. I don't really think DGB is scum for it b/c I could see how town that just got burned could think that.

In post 56, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 29, petapan wrote:for the record i have setup-related thoughts but they're not for sharing in the early game, will talk more about it later

like this seems like a scum post.

lol nero chainsawing for his buddy already

Peta are you saying DGB and Nero are both scum deliberately taking opposite sides of a setup spec argument and then jumping in to protect each other? That's a strech they planned it out pregame.

Can you explain more?

In post 34, DrippingGoofball wrote:What about a neighborhood with two traitors, the town kills one, then the other traitor is treated as conftown because no mod would have a neighborhood of two traitors?

tbf, the idea that there could be multiple scum in the hood was very much brought up and I would have been endgamed if you lynched my buddies first, which you failed to do.

titus he was accusing me of attacking him b/c im scum with DW

In post 61, petapan wrote:i literally never make that post about the setup as scum and it'll be apparent why when i talk about it

why is it important to not talk about it now and wait?

In post 65, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 61, petapan wrote:i literally never make that post about the setup as scum and it'll be apparent why when i talk about it

why is it important to not talk about it now and wait?

My thoughts exactly.

In post 60, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 33, petapan wrote:yes please try to double down on your sidetrack because you think you have

such a great point

peta is just all up on DBG's backside here

nevermind that i was the first one to engage dwlee and call him scum, my point is way less baking up dgb and ore that the way dwlee chose to engage and turn things into a pedantic argument about how not to play where he could make an "ideal" theoretical point about how "we shouldn't play it like mountainous" that glosses over what dgb is actually trying to say (we should emphasize dayplay and minimize decisions based on mechanical speculation, basic stuff). in the process he steers the conversation toward something non-game-advancing, that is, arguing about "well of course you should consider claims in a normal setup". and when i immediately jump him after that he responds not like someone who has genuine conviction in what he's arguing but cornered scum who doesn't know how to react

In post 64, Nero Cain wrote:titus he was accusing me of attacking him b/c im scum with DW

Whoops. That makes a hair more sense.

@peta, why do you think Nero is chainsawing for his buddy rather than two people who happen to agree? It sounds like Nero and DGB were both in the same game and thus have different perspectives.

In post 66, Titus wrote:

In post 65, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 61, petapan wrote:i literally never make that post about the setup as scum and it'll be apparent why when i talk about it

why is it important to not talk about it now and wait?

My thoughts exactly.

because doing so now is likely to derail the game a bit and it gives some info i don't want out right away, it'll make sense when i eventually talk about it

@peta/Nero, I largely feel Dwlee was scum that didn't know how to react as well. It almost feels like Dwlee is going to rely on a claim to get him through given the strong playerlist.

In post 68, Titus wrote:@peta, why do you think Nero is chainsawing for his buddy rather than two people who happen to agree? It sounds like Nero and DGB were both in the same game and thus have different perspectives.

because there's a nascent wagon on dwlee and he's coming in looking to discredit one of the vocal accusers with shit arguments while offering a flat defense of dwlee with no actual substance

In post 68, Titus wrote:@peta, why do you think Nero is chainsawing for his buddy rather than two people who happen to agree?

i know the answer to this one too! It fits his narrative. It's just strongly worded bullshit and if DW is town and gets lynched today then he can just push me tomorrow.

In post 69, petapan wrote:

In post 66, Titus wrote:

In post 65, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 61, petapan wrote:i literally never make that post about the setup as scum and it'll be apparent why when i talk about it

why is it important to not talk about it now and wait?

My thoughts exactly.

because doing so now is likely to derail the game a bit and it gives some info i don't want out right away, it'll make sense when i eventually talk about it

The game barely has rails and if it'll help catch scum, why not? I'm ok with a diversion since the game is largely setup spec. It's fine for breaking out of RVS but I want reason based votes.

he's just scum thats stringing us along "guys don't kill me, I have important information to give." but he's not worried about getting nighkilled b4 he can out