Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2020 3:16 am
Some people think I’m yoinkers
can you elaborateIn post 488, Datisi wrote:i agreed with your conclusion (i.e. teacher townlean), i think the way you're getting there is scummy
one of teacher's posts (i think the last one) felt more fence-sitty than taylor's (note that i don't think fence-sitting is scum!indicative)
yet you were attacking taylor but townreadign teacher
Also respond to this from datisiIn post 475, Datisi wrote:err, what's the logic behind it? just the "burden of proficiency" thing?
nobody said that voting people to pressure them into giving explanations isn't "valid"???In post 498, shellyc wrote:I want to hear explanations from people and I vote for them to pressure them into giving explanationsIn post 488, Datisi wrote:"ico please confirm if you're in a pt" and voting him when he continued ignoring you about that felt very much like a rolefish
is that not valid
I interpreted that as my vote being scummyIn post 505, Datisi wrote:i'm saying the subject that you were pressing on is scummy
i was thinking of the "BM/Noraa does look TvS to me, but Im not really sure what way" lineIn post 501, shellyc wrote:can you elaborateIn post 488, Datisi wrote:i agreed with your conclusion (i.e. teacher townlean), i think the way you're getting there is scummy
one of teacher's posts (i think the last one) felt more fence-sitty than taylor's (note that i don't think fence-sitting is scum!indicative)
yet you were attacking taylor but townreadign teacher
teachers last post shades taylor and alonzo. i dont think thats fence-sitting at all. he also states noraavBM is TvS which is an Opinion
also where did you get the teacher townpings then?
Just because something is part of someone’s behaviour also doesn’t make that not dubious in a game context. If someone is a compulsive liar as part of their RL personality and they compulsively lie in game, that doesn’t make their continuous lying less scummy. Scum tactic is a scum tacticIn post 504, shellyc wrote:menal shading me for my personality (sarcastic behaviour) isn’t a valid train of logic because it’s not AI for me
shelly i think you missed this too (response to 429 i think)In post 470, Datisi wrote:@shelly, don't think i get it? like is your logic that scum!taylor sees a tvt shitfight but she's afraid of stepping in so she truthfully calls it tvt?
Where did I say thisIn post 506, shellyc wrote:secondly menal doesn't really articulate the point of scum!noraa and just says they're playing in a agenda way
Ok I reread things. I also reconsider things.In post 508, Menalque wrote:Yes, sometimes the consensus is correct. That doesn’t give you carte blanche to justify whatever shift of your reads that you like. I want to see what the thought process was behind you deciding that instead of being likely TvS you decided it was likely TvT. I want to know why, after calling me town/townpings several times you immediately came out with “hmmm maybe mena is scum” the second I so much as breathed in your direction.
Also respond to the rest of this. You cherrypicked the part about you being hyperbolic to avoid responding to the other reasons why I think you’re scum.In post 458, Menalque wrote:That’s... not what was said? There’s nothing wrong with changing stances/reads nor did I say there was. But there needs to be evidence of a thought process there to back that up and I don’t see it with you, I just see you changing your reads to suit the situation.In post 451, shellyc wrote:Note to self do not reconsider my reads or change my stances ever again.
Note to self do not townread people.
also how am I pocketing you if I now think you're scum
I also think you nisunderstanding what I’m saying in a hyperbolic way is scummy fwiw
All of your initial posting is about how I’m townpinging you or towny for this or that, agreeing with my takes etc. Then the moment I start putting pressure on you suddenly all that vanishes and I’m prob!scum?
taylor could be scum with someone of {BM, Noraa} not ruling out TvS just yetIn post 511, Datisi wrote:shelly i think you missed this too (response to 429 i think)
like im overdefensive of myself + play very bad under pressure so i think i just triggered that againIn post 514, Menalque wrote:Also respond to the rest of this. You cherrypicked the part about you being hyperbolic to avoid responding to the other reasons why I think you’re scum.In post 458, Menalque wrote:That’s... not what was said? There’s nothing wrong with changing stances/reads nor did I say there was. But there needs to be evidence of a thought process there to back that up and I don’t see it with you, I just see you changing your reads to suit the situation.In post 451, shellyc wrote:Note to self do not reconsider my reads or change my stances ever again.
Note to self do not townread people.
also how am I pocketing you if I now think you're scum
I also think you nisunderstanding what I’m saying in a hyperbolic way is scummy fwiw
All of your initial posting is about how I’m townpinging you or towny for this or that, agreeing with my takes etc. Then the moment I start putting pressure on you suddenly all that vanishes and I’m prob!scum?
wasn't the point about "menal not articulating about scum!noraa" during the time you were calling him town?In post 506, shellyc wrote:oh why am I missing so many things
firstly the BoP thing, secondly menal doesn't really articulate the point of scum!noraa and just says they're playing in a agenda way
the vote itself is like naiIn post 507, shellyc wrote:I interpreted that as my vote being scummyIn post 505, Datisi wrote:i'm saying the subject that you were pressing on is scummy
you could see it as rolefish but idrt finding out about a neighbourhood is discovering some real amazing PR
I don’t remember this but I’ll reread your towngame againIn post 516, shellyc wrote:likeim overdefensive of myself + play very bad under pressureso i think i just triggered that again
yeah you're townpinging because the Voices of my Gut deem you town but im trying to re-evaluate
Like 10 or somethingIn post 518, Noraa wrote:Holy fuck how many pages did I miss?
i mean the scum!motivation for egging on a tvt fight is pretty simple lol, keep the idiots tunneled at eachotherIn post 515, shellyc wrote:taylor could be scum with someone of {BM, Noraa} not ruling out TvS just yetIn post 511, Datisi wrote:shelly i think you missed this too (response to 429 i think)
besides whats scum motivation for taylor to step into a tvt shitfight, they can just hang out in the shadows