Mafiascum.net

In post 499, VP Baltar wrote:Tanner, I am only skimming. Are we certain to have a scum at the gate? If yes, resolving that first makes sense. We can yeet imaginality into the sun.

unless this is a. elaborate troll by prism, yes, there is a scum at the gate. took you until now?

an elaborate troll*

imagine actually proofreading before hitting submit

i think gate should resolve either second or last

if implo or lukewarm flip scum it makes it much less likely imo that imaginality is scum here

In post 500, Tanner wrote:took you until now?

I don't know what this means. Like I said, I'm not really reading the game yet. Just saw you were IC. What am I missing?

In post 502, Aristeia wrote:i think gate should resolve either second or last

if implo or lukewarm flip scum it makes it much less likely imo that imaginality is scum here

Would flipping imaginality provide an inverse associative...if so, doesn't it make significantly more sense to flip the gate first since that's a 50/50?

i mean, the whole point of the setup is that there's one scum in each of the three locations. and you're going "wait, there's scum at the gate?"

what was your thought process wrt our location when you saw that i was ic'ed?

In post 505, Tanner wrote:i mean, the whole point of the setup is that there's one scum in each of the three locations. and you're going "wait, there's scum at the gate?"

what was your thought process wrt our location when you saw that i was ic'ed?

I thought scum can place wherever they want as long as it's not all three at one location?

If it has to be one at each, then my thought is your imaginality read was right and let's flip it

In post 506, VP Baltar wrote:I thought scum can place wherever they want as long as it's not all three at one location?

yes, on day one. because they get a night swap. with which they can correct the number of scum in locations.

i mean like. if you thought a location can be without scum, what did you think the three of us were even gonna do lol

is this dumb tell too stupid to be a real dumb tell

then again it is vp baltar

In post 508, Tanner wrote:i mean like. if you thought a location can be without scum, what did you think the three of us were even gonna do lol

I thought scum could try to manipulate it for a free win...though now I'm saying it that is stupid since they could do that 100 percent of the time.

Good news is that means imaginality is 100 percent scum and he did a reads list d1

i was gonna say "surely scum!him doesn't fake *this*, right?"

but i still remember my first game with him, where scum!him deadass went "guys, does scum have daytalk?" and like, yes he does.

In post 504, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 502, Aristeia wrote:i think gate should resolve either second or last

if implo or lukewarm flip scum it makes it much less likely imo that imaginality is scum here

Would flipping imaginality provide an inverse associative...if so, doesn't it make significantly more sense to flip the gate first since that's a 50/50?

hmm

well imaginality is already flipped fypov so why don't you tell me what that tells you about the layout of the rest of the game?

Tanner although we are worlds apart may I still flirt with you? the two lads in the keep seem more interested in each other :/

In post 514, Aristeia wrote:the two lads in the keep seem more interested in each other :/

it is almost 2am and i like, actually laughed out loud oops

of course you may, i was afraid you'd never ask. i do have to crash now, but we can talk tomorrow, i'm looking forward to it. :>

In post 514, Aristeia wrote:Tanner although we are worlds apart may I still flirt with you? the two lads in the keep seem more interested in each other :/

This is two times tonight you've made me laugh, and that might be worth a vote

In post 513, Aristeia wrote:well imaginality is already flipped fypov so why don't you tell me what that tells you about the layout of the rest of the game?

I will but like I said, I can't really read the game until late tomorrow.

Who do you think is scum at the gate?

In post 517, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 513, Aristeia wrote:well imaginality is already flipped fypov so why don't you tell me what that tells you about the layout of the rest of the game?

I will but like I said, I can't really read the game until late tomorrow.

Who do you think is scum at the gate?

I have some thoughts but I'd like to hear yours first

In post 516, Pavowski wrote:

In post 514, Aristeia wrote:Tanner although we are worlds apart may I still flirt with you? the two lads in the keep seem more interested in each other :/

This is two times tonight you've made me laugh, and that might be worth a vote

Gosh both you and Luke are such teases.

I think you both are trying to make the other one jealous because you're both clearly not here for me.

In post 515, Tanner wrote:

In post 514, Aristeia wrote:the two lads in the keep seem more interested in each other :/

it is almost 2am and i like, actually laughed out loud oops

of course you may, i was afraid you'd never ask. i do have to crash now, but we can talk tomorrow, i'm looking forward to it. :>

sweet dreams then, see you tommorrow

In post 518, Aristeia wrote:

In post 517, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 513, Aristeia wrote:well imaginality is already flipped fypov so why don't you tell me what that tells you about the layout of the rest of the game?

I will but like I said, I can't really read the game until late tomorrow.

Who do you think is scum at the gate?

I have some thoughts but I'd like to hear yours first

You've heard mine about the gate. Proceed.

Well I wouldn't expect you to say anything other than "the other person is mafia"

I am trying to pick your brain to see what information that gives you about the rest of the game and why it might be so.

In post 522, Aristeia wrote:I am trying to pick your brain to see what information that gives you about the rest of the game and why it might be so.

Right. Me getting your thoughts also is helpful though. Two way street and all. I'm merely asking you to comment on the gate. I understand wanting me to talk first on the other games.

In post 195, imaginality wrote:Toogeloo
- in my head I thought they were lurking but they've posted more than I remembered, probably a town point as my scumdar pings louder than my towndar
- some good questioning of Ari
- I'm doubtful of his idea that it's better not to give reads yet but doesn't seem like a stance scum would take

Looking at imaginality's wall post right now because snow and ice has canceled my dinner plans...

This read looks very fake reasons to me. Other than "some good questioning of Ari", imaginality is hand waving here by stating 'these things might be scummy, but ill actually town read Toog for them'. Which is unfortunate because I had kind of had gut town pings on Toog.