Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:06 pm**

I believe in meta when it makes my point. I don't believe it when it doesn't.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:09 pm**

In post 495, humaneatingmonkey wrote:yeah but why though? he just keeps on saying that. why me and nm?

I don’t really know but I’ll ask him to answer it. I initially was pretty much convinced on it but I’m leaning to Dwlee/STD who are objectively being much scummier.

STD keeps saying things that are inconsistent.

~N

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:10 pm**

In post 500, Save The Dragons wrote:I believe in meta when it makes my point. I don't believe it when it doesn't.

Speaking of bs takes . . .

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:12 pm**

what were you referring to lol

i feel silly

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:12 pm**

In post 347, Save The Dragons wrote:i don't think scum!flea defends nancy so hard tho

In post 352, Save The Dragons wrote:watch it be scum!flea town!nancy lol

I was just thinking you’re trying to set Flea up after we flip. Hmmm . . .

~N

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:14 pm**

In post 502, Nancy Sinatra wrote:
In post 500, Save The Dragons wrote:I believe in meta when it makes my point. I don't believe it when it doesn't.
Speaking of bs takes . . .

What town player ever makes a bullshit post like this?

You either think meta is useful or you don’t.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:14 pm**

In post 499, Save The Dragons wrote:
In post 450, Roden wrote:
In post 378, Save The Dragons wrote:TIL 1-4 town on a read = BS read
?

Any shared read that consists of 50% or more scum players is a pretty bad read. 1 town 3 scum sharing a read is literally just a pocket.

I think you have a point if it's 1 scum 3 town or all 4 town having a mind meld. But if you think there's a chance 2 or more scum are sharing a read with town then I think it's a really bad read.
BS read =/= bad read

Please try to come up with a response that isn't solely about semantics.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:15 pm**

In post 500, Save The Dragons wrote:I believe in meta when it makes my point. I don't believe it when it doesn't.

Ew.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:16 pm**

In post 506, Roden wrote:
In post 499, Save The Dragons wrote:
In post 450, Roden wrote:
In post 378, Save The Dragons wrote:TIL 1-4 town on a read = BS read
?

Any shared read that consists of 50% or more scum players is a pretty bad read. 1 town 3 scum sharing a read is literally just a pocket.

We are on different planets dude
I think you have a point if it's 1 scum 3 town or all 4 town having a mind meld. But if you think there's a chance 2 or more scum are sharing a read with town then I think it's a really bad read.
BS read =/= bad read
Please try to come up with a response that isn't solely about semantics.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:17 pm**

In post 506, Roden wrote:
In post 499, Save The Dragons wrote:
In post 450, Roden wrote:
In post 378, Save The Dragons wrote:TIL 1-4 town on a read = BS read
?

Any shared read that consists of 50% or more scum players is a pretty bad read. 1 town 3 scum sharing a read is literally just a pocket.

I think you have a point if it's 1 scum 3 town or all 4 town having a mind meld. But if you think there's a chance 2 or more scum are sharing a read with town then I think it's a really bad read.
BS read =/= bad read
Please try to come up with a response that isn't solely about semantics.

We are on different planets dude

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:18 pm**

In post 338, Save The Dragons wrote:i mean i stopped voting nancy because i agree with their stance that she's reactive. this is kind of what i'd expect from nancy as town but it seems a bit extreme and when you put it like "caught for the wrong reasons" i'm vibing with that more than "she's reactive"

If you and Dwlee are not both scum, one of you is pocketing the other and now you actually look worse than he does because you keep changing your reasons.

VOTE: STD

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:20 pm**

In post 500, Save The Dragons wrote:I believe in meta when it makes my point. I don't believe it when it doesn't.

This was a joke

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:21 pm**

In post 509, Save The Dragons wrote:
In post 506, Roden wrote:
In post 499, Save The Dragons wrote:
In post 450, Roden wrote:
In post 378, Save The Dragons wrote:TIL 1-4 town on a read = BS read
?

Any shared read that consists of 50% or more scum players is a pretty bad read. 1 town 3 scum sharing a read is literally just a pocket.

I think you have a point if it's 1 scum 3 town or all 4 town having a mind meld. But if you think there's a chance 2 or more scum are sharing a read with town then I think it's a really bad read.
BS read =/= bad read
Please try to come up with a response that isn't solely about semantics.
We are on different planets dude

VOTE: STD

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:21 pm**

In post 507, Roden wrote:
In post 500, Save The Dragons wrote:I believe in meta when it makes my point. I don't believe it when it doesn't.
Ew.

I really think Italiano is wrong and STD is scum, probably with Dwlee. This reeks of Witchhunt game.

~N

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:21 pm**

Roden, i think he meant that bad does not mean bs and i agree. bs is made-up and non-existent. bad is inaccurate.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:22 pm**

In post 450, Roden wrote:
In post 378, Save The Dragons wrote:TIL 1-4 town on a read = BS read
?

Any shared read that consists of 50% or more scum players is a pretty BS read. 1 town 3 scum sharing a read is literally just a pocket.

I think you have a point if it's 1 scum 3 town or all 4 town having a mind meld. But if you think there's a chance 2 or more scum are sharing a read with town then I think it's a really BS read.

There you go.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:22 pm**

In post 511, Save The Dragons wrote:
In post 500, Save The Dragons wrote:I believe in meta when it makes my point. I don't believe it when it doesn't.
This was a joke

Then answer my question.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:23 pm**

In post 514, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Roden, i think he meant that bad does not mean bs and i agree. bs is made-up and non-existent. bad is inaccurate.

I know what he means. He also knows what I mean and the point I'm trying to make.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:26 pm**

aight goodbye im gonna let this one blow over.

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:27 pm**

I believe in some meta adjacent things but not meta itself. Like when people say "she's like this as town" maybe I agree.

When people say "In x game I was like this here's a link here's a quote" maybe I don't care

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:29 pm**

In post 518, humaneatingmonkey wrote:aight goodbye im gonna let this one blow over.

Me too I'm gonna hide behind you. I don't know what to say

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:29 pm**

In post 519, Save The Dragons wrote:I believe in some meta adjacent things but not meta itself. Like when people say "she's like this as town" maybe I agree.

When people say "In x game I was like this here's a link here's a quote" maybe I don't care

Yeah, think I’m keeping my vote.

~N

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:30 pm**

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:30 pm**

It's pretty honest

Posted: **Thu Jun 02, 2022 5:31 pm**

In post 298, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Is N_M really that toxic? I've been playing with him and he seems like he's seriously playing so far. Sure, he might quickhammer here and there but that's part of his playstyle. Targetting N_M personally for a playstyle seems mean to me idk

He is genereally just... random day 1.

Mafiascum.net

open 852: store bought potions (sold!)